Forum Discussion v6 - Newpunch Migration Underway

[myon]

[QUOTE=ChronoBlade;53185924]i like how we got a wiki[/QUOTE]

if it exists, it'll have a wiki

[fruxodaily]

[QUOTE=Hezzy;53185890]Could make me an admin / moderator? Pretty sure my name is just "Hezzy" on there[/QUOTE]

I'll see what I can do

[Zotobom]

[QUOTE=myon;53185926]if it exists, it'll have a wiki[/QUOTE]

Correct:
[SFW but I'd still recommend not looking around cause it's just so fucking weird] [url]http://cartoonfatness.wikia.com/wiki/The_Fudge_Yeah_Cartoon_Fatness_Wiki[/url]

[hakkoru]

[QUOTE=AtomicSans;53185549]It's this. WARNING, do not do anything in this image.

[url]https://i.imgur.com/BuF31.jpg[/url]

There, now I can't get sued.[/QUOTE]

man this brings me back

[Tlean]

[QUOTE=fruxodaily;53185872]Guess I'm running wikipunch by myself[/QUOTE]

Thought that wiki was inactive but it still gave me tons of info about the forum history so thanks!

[fruxodaily]

It's just weird cause normally kiwi will message me on telegram or WhatsApp and yeah came as a surprise cause I hardly touch facepunch nowadays with uni coming back and shit

But look I'll work it out, get what I can, get the FTP and make hezzy admin and whatever. It'll be aight

[Phygon]

Am I crazy or did Fast Threads just get emptied of all content?

[editline]9th March 2018[/editline]

[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/lXYM07s.png[/IMG]

[Revenge282]

[QUOTE=phygon;53188212]Am I crazy or did Fast Threads just get emptied of all content?

[editline]9th March 2018[/editline]

[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/lXYM07s.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]

It's [sp]unfortunately[/sp] still all there

[t]https://puu.sh/zDEfM/0aa05f256c.png[/t]

[LZTYBRN]

fast threads is weird to me because there's definitely more threads than that in there but it only lets you see the first page of content

[editline]8th March 2018[/editline]

[QUOTE=Revenge282;53188231]It's [sp]unfortunately[/sp] still all there

[t]https://puu.sh/zDEfM/0aa05f256c.png[/t][/QUOTE]

wait what? I don't have any page numbers

[t]https://i.gyazo.com/ad566cf22089cf3ea789b1ea02ebf428.png[/t]

I've literally had this same amount of threads on just one page for two years, never any numbers

[Phygon]

[QUOTE=LZTYBRN;53188232]fast threads is weird to me because there's definitely more threads than that in there but it only lets you see the first page of content

[editline]8th March 2018[/editline]

wait what? I don't have any page numbers

[t]https://i.gyazo.com/ad566cf22089cf3ea789b1ea02ebf428.png[/t]

I've literally had this same fast threads page for two years, never any numbers[/QUOTE]

Wait, did you think that literally nobody ever made new threads in FT?

[LZTYBRN]

[QUOTE=phygon;53188240]Wait, did you think that literally nobody ever made new threads in FT?[/QUOTE]

No, I mean I've never been able to see more than this specific number of threads in Fast Threads. I assumed it was limited on purpose to show only the newest posts at a given time but I guess I'm just somehow.. not getting the page selection and all the older threads? lmao

[Alice]

[QUOTE=LZTYBRN;53188243]No, I mean I've never been able to see more than this specific number of threads in Fast Threads. I assumed it was limited on purpose to show only the newest posts at a given time but I guess I'm just somehow.. not getting the page selection and all the older threads? lmao[/QUOTE]
[url]https://facepunch.com/profile.php?do=editoptions[/url]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/sHFd1sf.png[/img]
Probably is set to "use forum default" and the default is some low number like a month.

[LZTYBRN]

[QUOTE=Alice3173;53188272][url]https://facepunch.com/profile.php?do=editoptions[/url]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/sHFd1sf.png[/img]
Probably is set to "use forum default" and the default is some low number like a month.[/QUOTE]

thanks, that was a horrible way to live my life for so long

[ASIC]

I got a minor comment about the rules.

This part of the rules is inaccurate. "Ratings are there to complement posts. Do not complain about getting bad ratings. You’re an idiot, deal with it."

You can also get banned for commenting on (other types of) ratings that you/someone else receive, without necessarily complaining either.

So basically the issue is this:
The rules are not meant to cover every possibility and rather to give a general idea of what is not allowed.
However this particular rule is in fact overly specific.
it only covers 1 specific circumstance (complaining about negative ratings), while the de facto rule is much broader in application.

[IAmIroningMyDog]

Will the wiki have a hall of infamy for noticeable users that have come and gone over the years?

[Col. Buggernuts]

[QUOTE=ASIC;53189040]I got a minor comment about the rules.

This part of the rules is inaccurate. "Ratings are there to complement posts. Do not complain about getting bad ratings. You’re an idiot, deal with it."

You can also get banned for commenting on (other types of) ratings that you/someone else receive, without necessarily complaining either.

So basically the issue is this:
The rules are not meant to cover every possibility and rather to give a general idea of what is not allowed.
However this particular rule is in fact overly specific.
it only covers 1 specific circumstance (complaining about negative ratings), while the de facto rule is much broader in application.[/QUOTE]Yeh prolly needs to be sorted out
[QUOTE=Citrus705;53189047]Will the wiki have a hall of infamy for noticeable users that have come and gone over the years?[/QUOTE]It already does sorta. Feel free to fill in any noticeable blanks w/ sources.

[TheSyntaX]

We need more report user reasons.
Not just Spam, Warez, Flaming/Trolling.

I constantly see people "complain about ratings" for example.

[myon]

[QUOTE=arleitiss;53189058]We need more report user reasons.
Not just Spam, Warez, Flaming/Trolling.

I constantly see people "complain about ratings" for example.[/QUOTE]

read the faq on the op

[Ninny]

[QUOTE=arleitiss;53189058]We need more report user reasons.
Not just Spam, Warez, Flaming/Trolling.

I constantly see people "complain about ratings" for example.[/QUOTE]

Report reason don't matter at all really. Mods can figure out themselves what's wrong with the post.

[kokonut]

[QUOTE=ASIC;53189040]I got a minor comment about the rules.

This part of the rules is inaccurate. "Ratings are there to complement posts. Do not complain about getting bad ratings. You’re an idiot, deal with it."

You can also get banned for commenting on (other types of) ratings that you/someone else receive, without necessarily complaining either.

So basically the issue is this:
The rules are not meant to cover every possibility and rather to give a general idea of what is not allowed.
However this particular rule is in fact overly specific.
it only covers 1 specific circumstance (complaining about negative ratings), while the de facto rule is much broader in application.[/QUOTE]
Covered by common sense

[IAmIroningMyDog]

[QUOTE=kokonut;53189066]Covered by common sense[/QUOTE]

Common sense is subjective and vague

[TheSyntaX]

[QUOTE=myon;53189062]read the faq on the op[/QUOTE]

oh right, thanks, missed that.

[Damian0358]

[QUOTE=Citrus705;53189047]Will the wiki have a hall of infamy for noticeable users that have come and gone over the years?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;53189057]It already does sorta. Feel free to fill in any noticeable blanks w/ sources.[/QUOTE]

To be specific, the old Hall of Infamy thread was adapted into an [URL="https://www.wikipunch.com/Facepunch_Hall_of_Infamy"]article[/URL], currently a work in progress.

[Hezzy]

[QUOTE=ASIC;53189040]I got a minor comment about the rules.

This part of the rules is inaccurate. "Ratings are there to complement posts. Do not complain about getting bad ratings. You’re an idiot, deal with it."

You can also get banned for commenting on (other types of) ratings that you/someone else receive, without necessarily complaining either.

So basically the issue is this:
The rules are not meant to cover every possibility and rather to give a general idea of what is not allowed.
However this particular rule is in fact overly specific.
it only covers 1 specific circumstance (complaining about negative ratings), while the de facto rule is much broader in application.[/QUOTE]

Could you reword it and I'll amend the rules?

[JerryAnderson]

[QUOTE=Alice3173;53188272][url]https://facepunch.com/profile.php?do=editoptions[/url]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/sHFd1sf.png[/img]
Probably is set to "use forum default" and the default is some low number like a month.[/QUOTE]

Holy shit. Now I can go ALL the way back in DDT and see every single quality post there is.

[Trekintosh]

I feel like BDA's posting and debating in [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1595564&p=53189473]this thread, specifically the linked page[/url] is unbecoming of a moderator. Weird personal attacks, snide insinuations, and insulting people he doesn't agree with. It reminds me of a lot of the posts attacking Tudd that would get people banned in the past.

[Zonesylvania]

to add to that, this is essentially low effort posting, and that's also against the polidicks guidelines
[url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1595564&p=53189556&viewfull=1#post53189556[/url]

[Raidyr]

[QUOTE=Zonesylvania;53189965]to add to that, this is essentially low effort posting, and that's also against the polidicks guidelines
[URL]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1595564&p=53189556&viewfull=1#post53189556[/URL][/QUOTE]
He was responding to someone asking a question with someone elses quote. If he didn't post "lol" would it still be low effort?

[Leestons]

[QUOTE=Raidyr;53189972]He was responding to someone asking a question with someone elses quote. If he didn't post "lol" would it still be low effort?[/QUOTE]

If someone else did it, would they be banned for "why reply?"

[Grenadiac]

My only real complaint is that these two got such short bans:

[url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1595564&p=53189754&viewfull=1#post53189754[/url]
[url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1595564&p=53189726&viewfull=1#post53189726[/url]

-when the precedent for this kind of shitposting is much longer. I'm pretty sure if I had posted "anti gunners are such babies" or "no dick liberals" I would be sitting out a month or longer.