[QUOTE=Zombie man70;40321799]I was being sarcastic because every comment or opinion I post someone asks for a source.[/QUOTE]
Nice avatar.
...
[SUB]source?[/SUB]
It's probably just a quick demo. It will end up sounding better and most likely be rearranged.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;40321941]I'm embarrassed that anyone thought that 'radio edit' was real, it sounds awful.
[editline]17th April 2013[/editline]
You'll know when it's real because it will be [b]amazing[/b].[/QUOTE]
"Human After All"
[QUOTE=harryh11;40322062]"Human After All"[/QUOTE]
what about human after all
human after all is a fuckin' great song
Yes. But the album leaked months before the official release, and a lot of people thought it couldn't possibly be the real thing, given how simple and repetitive a lot of the songs are
[QUOTE=harryh11;40322172]Yes. But the album leaked months before the official release, and a lot of people thought it couldn't possibly be the real thing, given how simple and repetitive a lot of the songs are[/QUOTE]
It didn't sound like complete shit and have different sound qualities throughout songs, nor reuse the same teaser over and over, though. AFAIK.
[QUOTE=Zombie man70;40321974]It's probably just a quick demo. It will end up sounding better and most likely be rearranged.[/QUOTE]
Or you know, it's fan made/fake.
Well. Some of it may have sounded like complete shit, I recall smelling the distinct aroma of faeces upon the first few listens. Now, though, I (sometimes) enjoy every song. I imagine some of that is down to nostalgia.
With regard to sound qualities, i can't tell with my naked ear alone, but I did see that analysis someone posted, and if thats all correct then i suppose you're right.
[QUOTE=harryh11;40322273]Well. Some of it may have sounded like complete shit, I recall smelling the distinct aroma of faeces upon the first few listens. Now, though, I (sometimes) enjoy every song. I imagine some of that is down to nostalgia.
With regard to sound qualities, i can't tell with my naked ear alone, but I did see that analysis someone posted, and if thats all correct then i suppose you're right.[/QUOTE]
At 1:25~ it sounds like the singer's choking how do you not hear that.
CKkkckkHoakcokoaw!!!1;/
Sorry, can't hear you over my choking.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;40322294]At 1:25~ it sounds like the singer's choking how do you not hear that.[/QUOTE]
Well that's not sound quality is it, that's just the singer being shit.
What're all the fakes people are talking about? Is this one fake also, or legit?
[url]http://soundisstyle.com/2013/04/daft-punk-get-lucky-feat-pharrell-nile-rodgers.html[/url]
And I'm not sure if it's even been posted yet.
[QUOTE=That Ninja;40322552]What're all the fakes people are talking about? Is this one fake also, or legit?
[url]http://soundisstyle.com/2013/04/daft-punk-get-lucky-feat-pharrell-nile-rodgers.html[/url]
And I'm not sure if it's even been posted yet.[/QUOTE]
It's been posted, it's clearly fake.
[QUOTE=That Ninja;40322552]What're all the fakes people are talking about? Is this one fake also, or legit?
[url]http://soundisstyle.com/2013/04/daft-punk-get-lucky-feat-pharrell-nile-rodgers.html[/url]
And I'm not sure if it's even been posted yet.[/QUOTE]
This one was one of the fakes posted earlier.
People were saying similar things about Burial's truant when it was leaked, why can't it just be people's expectations not being met?
[QUOTE=Shadaez;40322559]It's been posted, it's clearly fake.[/QUOTE]
For real? It sounds pretty damn legitimate. Either way, I'm still eagerly waiting.
That's the one. The original source (Canadian radio station) said "This is not the official, final version of the song, but we heard it, and it sounds pretty damn close", which raises the question: where did it come from? Did they somehow get old recordings then splice them up the snl ad samples etc?
You probably shouldn't listen to a radio station telling you "YO THIS IS SO LEGIT LISTEN TO US"
[url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/17/daft-punk-get-lucky-leaked-full-song-pharrell-williams_n_3102455.html[/url]
I have no idea if this is the actual song or not, but sounds pretty close to it.
[QUOTE=Secone;40317642]It's already pretty much confirmed that it's not the official release. The reddit thread was closed down, news articles that initially posted about it have edited their articles, etc. Here's what the radio station even said:
“This is not the official, final version of the song, but we heard it, and it sounds pretty damn close..”
Even if it's "close" it's not the real version.
I never thought such a huge confusing storm of fakes and edits could come from one song, damn. I'm not listening to any of this shit until I hear it confirmed from Daft Punk themselves.[/QUOTE]
I love Robot Rock....
Pretty stoked to hear the actual released song and not a fake one. Even though the fake was still pretty damn good.
Fuck the "leaks". I'll wait for friday.
[QUOTE=TheDestroyerOfall;40323030][url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/17/daft-punk-get-lucky-leaked-full-song-pharrell-williams_n_3102455.html[/url]
I have no idea if this is the actual song or not, but sounds pretty close to it.[/QUOTE]
Same track as the one posted a bit above.
[QUOTE=Zombie man70;40321974]It's probably just a quick demo. It will end up sounding better and most likely be rearranged.[/QUOTE]
Why would they make a quick demo that has a different singer for some parts
Even though it's a good, somewhat convincing fake, a keen ear can pick up a lot of things that seem fake. For one, the polish in the vocals is rubbish and you can tell fake from real when it switches to Williams' voice. The processing is entirely different. Mix varies quite a bit between parts of the song due to the snippets officially released thus far being at different parts of the song.
It's not a demo or something that's even close to leaked. It's a fan that spent a lot of time making the most out of the officially released snippets.
Mhmm, It'll be awesome. I like Daft Punk about 2 years and this is their album back to old times. ;D
Aw man I just realised that Thomas no longer has a a smile on his helmet.
How fucking funny will it be if one of these versions that everyone has dismissed as "fake, this is terrible and the real version will sound so much better" actually [I]is[/I] the real version.
This entire thread will have so much egg on its face
[QUOTE=CoolCorky;40323672]How fucking funny will it be if one of these versions that everyone has dismissed as "fake, this is terrible and the real version will sound so much better" actually [I]is[/I] the real version.
This entire thread will have so much egg on its face[/QUOTE]
I'll be fucking disappointed that's what.
Seriously, the vocals snap to different peoples' voices in the middle of the song and the volume changes by the millisecond.
[video=youtube;K4Md7LLkK9I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4Md7LLkK9I[/video]
:v:
[SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP]rocco you silly goose[/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.