there is literally no reason for one with more actual lyrics to be fake.
I know it's not a fake because only Daft Punk can come up with songs that are that repetitive
I hope the radio edit isn't real only because I want more of Pharrell's voice in my ears, he doesn't sing enough in that one
[QUOTE=Atlascore;40327055]the voice completely changes once those few first verses are over.[/QUOTE]
no it doesn't
[QUOTE=Rusty100;40327076]no it doesn't[/QUOTE]
Then get better headphones or don't pretend like you know all about music production. The inconsistencies in the song are obvious as hell. This guy sounds white. I know Williams' voice and this ain't it. You'll see that I'm right in twelve hours, sir.
[QUOTE=SA Spyder;40327117]Then get better headphones or don't pretend like you know all about music production. The inconsistencies in the song are obvious as hell. This guy sounds white. I know Williams' voice and this ain't it. [B]You'll see that I'm right in twelve hours, sir[/B].[/QUOTE]
[I]If,[/I] it will actually be a [B]true[/B] radio edit.
[QUOTE=SA Spyder;40327117]Then get better headphones or don't pretend like you know all about music production.[/QUOTE]
you're gettin a bit defensive and desperate here. never claimed to know anything about music production, and i have really good headphones. just said it sounded the same the whole way through. i dunno dude i think you might be hearing differences that aren't there because your beloved daft punk made another boring ass song
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;40327008]I know it's not a fake because only Daft Punk can come up with songs that are that repetitive[/QUOTE]
[I]Brilliant idea #1: Insult Daft Punk in Daft Punk thread.[/I]
[QUOTE=Skyward;40327143][I]Brilliant idea #1: Insult Daft Punk in Daft Punk thread.[/I][/QUOTE]
idk i think its a pretty good idea
its a video thread not a daft punk megathread you're allowed to have different opinions here
This thread is going to turn real awkward when Daft Punk fans find out they've been calling "Get Lucky" shit and rubbish. Maybe I'll be wrong, but I am doubtful that this is a fake and that the "full version" would be hardly any different from the radio version. I'll admit as enteratining it would be to see this thread just flip-out over the song not meeting their expectations, I'd rather have the album be as good or better than Discovery.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;40327155]idk i think its a pretty good idea
its a video thread not a daft punk megathread you're allowed to have different opinions here[/QUOTE]
Honestly, I couldn't give two shits if you like it. Its an opinion thing so more power to ya.
All I know is that its gonna cause a shitstorm with a lot of people. I'd prefer to avoid that.
So no. Its not a good idea.
[QUOTE=Atlascore;40327175]The only one here with hearing differences here is you, there's a big shift in tone between the initial verses and the ones afterwards, not only tone but quality as well, you must have beats by dr dre or soemthing lol[/QUOTE]
got a pair of sennheiser 598's and listened as hard as i could, tonally and quality wise seems about the same the whole way. the way he ends words is the main thing that is consistent.
[QUOTE=Lamar;40327181]This thread is going to turn real awkward when Daft Punk fans find out they've been calling "Get Lucky" shit and rubbish. Maybe I'll be wrong, but I am doubtful that this is a fake and that the "full version" would be hardly any different from the radio version. I'll admit as enteratining it would be to see this thread just flip-out over the song not meeting their expectations, I'd rather have the album be as good or better than Discovery.[/QUOTE]
If the full song turns out to be exactly like this (read: it won't) then no, I won't say that it's suddenly a good song. This quality is far under what is expected from Daft Punk. And Pharrell Williams. And Nile Rodgers. I mean come on.
[editline]18th April 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Rusty100;40327209]got a pair of sennheiser 598's and listened as hard as i could, tonally and quality wise seems about the same the whole way. the way he ends words is the main thing that is consistent.[/QUOTE]
Then your ears are the problem.
Here's some advice: going into a thread about X to continually state your dislike of X is a pretty dumb thing to do. Yes you're allowed your opinion but there's a line between voicing opinions and threadshitting.
rub a mexican
rub a mexican
rub a mexican monkey
I'm just not even listening to a single thing until I get it officially. A lot easier to avoid the drama.
[editline]18th April 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=KlaseR;40327256]rub a mexican
rub a mexican
rub a mexican monkey[/QUOTE]
Funny, that's all I could hear until I found out what the actual lyrics were. :v:
Thankfully I hear it properly now.
[QUOTE=SA Spyder;40327226]If the full song turns out to be exactly like this (read: it won't) then no, I won't say that it's suddenly a good song. This quality is far under what is expected from Daft Punk. And Pharrell Williams. And Nile Rodgers. I mean come on.
[editline]18th April 2013[/editline]
Then your ears are the problem.
Here's some advice: going into a thread about X to continually state your dislike of X is a pretty dumb thing to do. Yes you're allowed your opinion but there's a line between voicing opinions and threadshitting.[/QUOTE]
i still am not shitting on daft punk i have literally just been saying that song sound real
read: still defensive
[QUOTE=RocketRacer;40327125][I]If,[/I] it will actually be a [B]true[/B] radio edit.[/QUOTE]
This time this was confirmed by Columbia Records themselves, we are without a doubt getting the actual full-blown radio edit at 12:01 AM EST
Also, hey guys let's not start up another giant debate over this again, how about this, everyone waits until 12:01, and THEN we can start getting up into each other's faces and start going "nya nya told you so"
[QUOTE=SA Spyder;40327226]If the full song turns out to be exactly like this (read: it won't) then no, I won't say that it's suddenly a good song. This quality is far under what is expected from Daft Punk. And Pharrell Williams. And Nile Rodgers. I mean come on.[/QUOTE]
Having a "super-group" doesn't necessarily mean the quality will be good though. Why has Daft Punk taken so much outside talent on-board with this new album? Doesn't it make you think they could have had a lot of difficulty coming up with new and interesting material?
[QUOTE=Lamar;40327294]Having a "super-group" doesn't necessarily mean the quality will be good though. Why has Daft Punk taken so much outside talent on-board with this new album? Doesn't it make you think they could have had a lot of difficulty coming up with new and interesting material?[/QUOTE]
umm, Daft Punk has always taken 'outside talent' technically speaking, they stated that for this album they kind of wanted to go back to their roots, or something like that I don't have the exact quote, but they wanted to 'go back to move forward'
[QUOTE=Rusty100;40327284]i still am not shitting on daft punk i have literally just been saying that song sound real
read: still defensive[/QUOTE]
To be fair, you did claim they make "boring ass song[s]"
I honestly can't see why you thought that'd go over okay here.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;40327284]i still am not shitting on daft punk i have literally just been saying that song sound real
read: still defensive[/QUOTE]
"i dunno dude i think you might be hearing differences that aren't there because your beloved daft punk made another boring ass song"
read: still threadshitting
I'm in a thread about a Daft Punk song, filled with Daft Punk fans, and I posted that its a band that produces boring ass songs. Gee why are they getting so defensive?
[QUOTE=Skyward;40327332]To be fair, you did claim they make "boring ass song[s]"[/QUOTE]
to be even fairer, i think this song is better than most daft punk songs
[editline]19th April 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=SA Spyder;40327337]"i dunno dude i think you might be hearing differences that aren't there because your beloved daft punk made another boring ass song"
read: still threadshitting
I'm in a thread about a Daft Punk song, filled with Daft Punk fans, and I posted that its a band that produces boring ass songs. Gee why are they getting so defensive?[/QUOTE]
that's almost nothing at all. it doesn't take much to get you guys riled up apparently
[editline]19th April 2013[/editline]
cool your jets
[QUOTE=Lamar;40327294]Having a "super-group" doesn't necessarily mean the quality will be good though. Why has Daft Punk taken so much outside talent on-board with this new album? Doesn't it make you think they could have had a lot of difficulty coming up with new and interesting material?[/QUOTE]
Because they wanted a slightly new direction and the one they chose, a groovy 70s-80s style, they don't really know too much about. So why not use the expertise of Nile Rodgers?
[QUOTE=Rusty100;40327353]to be even fairer, i think this song is better than most daft punk songs
[/QUOTE]
To be even more fairer, that's not really relevant when you just insulted their other songs :v:
[QUOTE=Skyward;40327386]To be even more fairer, that's not really relevant when you just insulted their other songs :v:[/QUOTE]
I don't think he's capable of processing that he just called this a boring ass song and then just proceeded to say its better than most of their songs. :v:
It begs the question: why is he in a fucking Daft Punk thread?
And again, I really don't wanna come across as bashing your for disliking Daft Punk. I can honestly see why people wouldn't like them.
I just think it was really dumb of you to come into a thread about them, say that they make boring music to a bunch of their fans, and then try to play yourself off as the victim of fanboy rage.
What did you THINK would happen?
My take on that song is that its and early version of it, lyrics are p. good but the song lacks.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;40327353]
that's almost nothing at all. it doesn't take much to get you guys riled up apparently
[/QUOTE]
what a sweeping statement
i wasn't riled up until you grouped all daft punk fans as a hivemind
Okay, now Rolling Stone.
[url]http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/new-daft-punk-song-get-lucky-will-premiere-at-midnight-20130418[/url]
[QUOTE=SA Spyder;40327512]Okay, now Rolling Stone.
[url]http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/new-daft-punk-song-get-lucky-will-premiere-at-midnight-20130418[/url][/QUOTE]
That is the worst picture of Daft Punk I have ever seen, shame on the photographer.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.