• Daft Punk "Get Lucky" Teaser at Coachella
    742 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Shadaez;40332791][url]http://batshare.com/i55dwlv6ac2k[/url] here it is [editline]18th April 2013[/editline] its awful [editline]18th April 2013[/editline] im crying[/QUOTE] I quite enjoyed it. I didn't hype it for myself, so maybe that's why. I think I'm going to even listen to it a second time.
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;40332858]You sure? It could be what we heard already, only regurgitated to yet another site.[/QUOTE] yeah its all over /r/daftpunk and it's a diff file size, I don't get it. The SNL teaser is so much better
that piano synth at the end or whatever it is is pretty terrible this whole track is pretty terrible except for the part from the snl ad the other lyrics don't even make sense what if they're not even releasing a single tonight and the internet has literally become a giant hype machine and at 12:01 am est thomas and guy-man announce that there is no single and we have been coaxed into a snafu once more
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;40332811]You're aware that the only 3 posts you've made in this thread have been "lol daft punk sucks I can't believe you guys are listening to it". What's the point? We get it, you don't like daft punk, but you're not gonna change our minds with your witty comments. Just leave.[/QUOTE] you're wrong, I love Daft Punk but only the daft punk before human after all
So many people will look like idiots after claiming that the leak is 100% fake, if it turns out that it's the legit thing.
[QUOTE=Clovernoodle;40332832]I still like it... :([/QUOTE] It's literally just hit me why all the fans are disliking it. It's not like Daft Punk, it's a very different direction from their old songs. I still think it's fucking fantastic but it makes a lot of sense when you think of it that way.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;40332791][URL]http://batshare.com/i55dwlv6ac2k[/URL] here it is [editline]18th April 2013[/editline] its awful [editline]18th April 2013[/editline] im crying[/QUOTE] This honestly sounds very similar to the other "leaked" version. Where the intro vocals and the other vocals past the SNL released portion sound....off. I mean it could very well be it, but it just sounds a bit off. Regarldess i do like this, but i'm in to this more for the actual music, not lyrics. I just wanted a full official track of the music, i could care less about the singing.
[QUOTE=ZombieDawgs;40332886]It's literally just hit me why all the fans are disliking it. It's not like Daft Punk, it's a very different direction from their old songs. I still think it's fucking fantastic but it makes a lot of sense when you think of it that way.[/QUOTE] Not really, I loved the snippet teaser. But the rest of the song seems so repetitive and uninspired. I mean it's decent, but I was hoping for something more. [editline]18th April 2013[/editline] And oh my god the synth at the end is so blegh.
[QUOTE=ZombieDawgs;40332886]It's literally just hit me why all the fans are disliking it. It's not like Daft Punk, it's a very different direction from their old songs. I still think it's fucking fantastic but it makes a lot of sense when you think of it that way.[/QUOTE] The actual music itself i think is very daft punk, the lyrics not so much.
[QUOTE=mysteryman;40332917]The actual music itself i think is very daft punk, the lyrics not so much.[/QUOTE] The music itself is a major disappointment, it's trying to be disco and groovy but it falls on its face because they're treating it like their house songs.
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;40332879]you're wrong, I love Daft Punk but only the daft punk before human after all[/QUOTE] Alive 2007 was quite a thing, why didn't you like it? Just curious.
To be honest I'd never really listened to daft punk before. I'd always listened to hip-hop & rap, but this song was so catchy I ended up buying some of their older albums, and am going to stay and get this single when it drops.
[QUOTE=ZombieDawgs;40332886]It's literally just hit me why all the fans are disliking it. It's not like Daft Punk, it's a very different direction from their old songs. I still think it's fucking fantastic but it makes a lot of sense when you think of it that way.[/QUOTE] not really, honestly the reason why so many fans dislike it isn't because it's a departure from daft punk, but because it sounds nothing like something daft punk would put out - its half-assedness is palpable, and that becomes more and more apparent the more you progress through the track i love the idea of an organic sound, the idea of going backward to find new inspiration - and i saw that inspiration in the clips and ads they put out at coachella and snl however, this leak or single or whatever it is lacks that organic feeling - it is the farthest thing from organic, especially with the shoddy, nonsensical lyrics slapped in, whereas the previous lyrics found in the snl carry meaning about reviving edm music and reinvigorating it with funk soul, and then the absolutely terrible end solo that conveys with the utmost concision how little effort was put into the song daft punk, whose attention to quality is such that they recorded using three microphones from three different eras, daft punk, whose attention to detail is such that it took them several weeks to write just one song, daft punk, whose attention to edm and pop music is such that they despise its current state, would never [i]ever[/i] put out something this low in quality i could be completely wrong and it's actually a daft punk solo, but if it is i'm gonna be pretty bummed
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;40332933]The music itself is a major disappointment, it's trying to be disco and groovy but it falls on its face because they're treating it like their house songs.[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3meoEYQjZAg[/media]
[QUOTE=ZombieDawgs;40332886]It's literally just hit me why all the fans are disliking it. It's not like Daft Punk, it's a very different direction from their old songs. I still think it's fucking fantastic but it makes a lot of sense when you think of it that way.[/QUOTE] I completely agree. Daft punk "is going back to go forward", Pharrell or Nile said this in the interviews about the new album. Its going to sound different because its a new sound that they want to do. That's why i'm so pumped for the new album because it is a new sound. Not a remix album, not a live album, but a whole new album made with some really good musicians that know what there doing.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;40332791][url]http://batshare.com/i55dwlv6ac2k[/url] here it is [editline]18th April 2013[/editline] its awful [editline]18th April 2013[/editline] im crying[/QUOTE] Stealing Woovies post from a different thread [QUOTE=Woovie;40332797][url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=QJBlcM-uwIc#t=644s[/url] Here's proof of the first leak being fake. They just autotuned these words and put them in the song.[/QUOTE]
So yeah, it was a Zune/Xbox music leak. More proof: [IMG_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/7V62NrG.jpg[/IMG_thumb] [IMG_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/tzggY1l.jpg[/IMG_thumb]
ok go to the xbox / zune music store and buy it, that is real people trust me
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;40332933]The music itself is a major disappointment, it's trying to be disco and groovy but it falls on its face because they're treating it like their house songs.[/QUOTE] I don't think you actually listen to disco and all you know of it is the overly famous disco tracks.
[QUOTE=Raptors!;40332994]So yeah, it was a Zune/Xbox music leak. More proof: [IMG_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/7V62NrG.jpg[/IMG_thumb] [IMG_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/tzggY1l.jpg[/IMG_thumb][/QUOTE] why are they releasing the radio edit? i want 6 minutes of funk
[url]http://cold.netburst.co.uk/file/Daft_Punk_-_Get_Lucky_(Radio_Edit).mp3[/url] Zune got the timezone wrong.
[QUOTE=superstepa;40332977]Stealing Woovies post from a different thread[/QUOTE] That's even more proof that the leaked track is real, Pharrell "foreshadowed" the lyrics for the fans. No way that those lyrics in the "fake" are taken and autotuned from that interview, it sounds too different.
There's so much missing from it, I really hope the full length isn't that awful.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;40333046]There's so much missing from it, I really hope the full length isn't that awful.[/QUOTE] Even if it is real, this is a radio edit. Radio edit means shorter and condensed.
can we get some professionals to look up songs with shitty radio edits
[QUOTE=mysteryman;40333055]Even if it is real, this is a radio edit. Radio edit means shorter and condensed.[/QUOTE] It's just a shortened version of a bad/mediocre song.
[url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1261013&p=40317323&viewfull=1#post40317323[/url] [QUOTE=Latency;40317323] If that's the real deal I might just burn my entire music collection. Also that synth at the end. lol ok[/QUOTE] [img]https://i.canvasugc.com/ugc/original/8b44dc29570134acce999c81aae769801ed721b5.png[/img]
[QUOTE=mysteryman;40333055]Even if it is real, this is a radio edit. Radio edit means shorter and condensed.[/QUOTE] it's real I have said this 3 times now [url]http://www.reddit.com/r/DaftPunk/comments/1cnag1/get_lucky_available_on_zune_not_sure_how_but_i/[/url] and I know, that is why I said that
Cant find it on xbox music [thumb]http://i.imgur.com/ZYXVBPy.png[/thumb]
Why would they release the radio edit for people to buy and not the full version? If this is real I hope the full version is better or has a little more, and includes the beginning of the collaborators videos. The audio quality itself still seems off too. I like it, but I guess it doesn't meet my expectations.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.