[QUOTE='[LOA] SonofBrim;17114378']Nope, yet another problem with our feudal system.... personally i think more efforts should be focused on the murders, etc. I just think drugs should remain illegal.[/QUOTE]
I just think that gays shouldn't marry. I mean, I know I have no argument and if I get my way far more people will be harmed, but I just think that.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;17114397]There's no reason for them to be. It creates more crime to have em banned then not.[/QUOTE]
I could maybe understand lifting the ban on marijuana, just not stuff like crack, etc.
[QUOTE='[LOA] SonofBrim;17114400']What?[/QUOTE]
Was that intentional or are you retarded
[QUOTE=Lankist;17114240]Yeah, and there were no drug cartels when they were legal.
[editline]10:17PM[/editline]
Who the fuck CARES if people abuse them.
It isn't your fucking business.[/QUOTE]
Fucking agree. Seriously, is it your business if some dude offs himself or does drugs? Is it your business if the guy driving down the street isn't wearing a seat belt? If you think it is, read tabloids about Brangelina and do breathing exercises into a paper bag instead of driving us up the walls with your nagging for things being "safer", taking away our rights in the process.
[QUOTE=-hibiki-;17113643]Every single law that exists is based off morals. Most people will agree that killing or harming other people is wrong, but it isn't necessarily a universal truth that physical harm by ill will is true. There is just no way to know. This is why technically everything we believe in life and every single law that exists in this world came from some kind of base morality.[/QUOTE]
It is not against the law to kill because it's "wrong", it's against the law because the government makes the laws and we made the government to protect us from harm. It's therefore against the law to kill because it goes against the governments primary objective.
OP sounds like a Libertarian.
"In my opinion, laws should only serve to protect people and establishments from each other."
[QUOTE='[LOA] SonofBrim;17114419']I could maybe understand lifting the ban on marijuana, just not stuff like crack, etc.[/QUOTE]
God damn it this is just going in circles.
AND WHY AM I STILL COMING BACK TO THIS THREAD god
[QUOTE=Oecleus;17114390]Wow nice thought crime, just because some people use explosives poorly doesn't mean all will, you are trying to place freedom and enjoyment over human life.[/quote]
That was a contradictory statement. You can't even formulate a sensationalist non sequitur correctly.
[quote]It doesn't, if drugs were completely removed the world would be a much better place.[/quote]
Maybe to someone like you who gets a boner from telling other people how to live their lives.
If we got rid of video games completely the world would be a much better place.
[QUOTE=Oecleus;17114390]Wow nice thought crime, just because some people use explosives poorly doesn't mean all will, you are trying to place freedom and enjoyment over human life.
It doesn't, if drugs were completely removed the world would be a much better place.
I'm not sure if you've convinced yourself this, or are just straight out admitting defeat. Or, maybe just too stupid to see any arguments being made. You really need to put yourself in my shoes, and see the argument instead of just ignoring everything that is written and saying "UR DUM"[/QUOTE]
I won't even bother with that statement. It's... I can't believe you'd actually try that.
Really? A world with no morphine a good place? No Anisthetics? Nothing? No drugs would not make the world a better place.
What's your argument again? It never made sense in the first place.
[QUOTE=Cowie1337;17114436]OP sounds like a Libertarian.
"In my opinion, laws should only serve to protect people and establishments from each other."[/QUOTE]
Got somethin' against libertarians, boy?
[QUOTE='[LOA] SonofBrim;17114400']What?[/QUOTE]
You said feudal system.
[QUOTE=T2L_Goose;17114422]Was that intentional or are you retarded[/QUOTE]
That was intentional :P
[QUOTE='[LOA] SonofBrim;17114455']That was intentional :P[/QUOTE]
You think that our country is a feudal system.
[QUOTE=T2L_Goose;17114438]God damn it this is just going in circles.
AND WHY AM I STILL COMING BACK TO THIS THREAD god[/QUOTE]
I felt that way with the obama thread...
[QUOTE='[LOA] SonofBrim;17114455']That was intentional :P[/QUOTE]
Then whatever the fuck you said makes no sense.
[QUOTE=Oecleus;17114390]Wow nice thought crime, just because some people use explosives poorly doesn't mean all will, you are trying to place freedom and enjoyment over human life.
It doesn't, if drugs were completely removed the world would be a much better place.
I'm not sure if you've convinced yourself this, or are just straight out admitting defeat. Or, maybe just too stupid to see any arguments being made. You really need to put yourself in my shoes, and see the argument instead of just ignoring everything that is written and saying "UR DUM"[/QUOTE]
because every time you smoke a joint a building is blown up
Perhaps the world would be a better place if fast food didn't exist. Or if extreme sports were illegal. Or if football was illegal. Or if paintball was illegal. Or if BB guns were illegal.
We are. You can't understand a single thing that anyone tells you. That's stupid in my opinion.
[QUOTE=Cowie1337;17114436]OP sounds like a Libertarian.
"In my opinion, laws should only serve to protect people and establishments from each other."[/QUOTE]
And?
[quote=t2l_goose;17114465]you think that our country is a feudal system.[/quote]
shit, i used the wrong word, hold on.
[QUOTE=T2L_Goose;17114450]Got somethin' against libertarians, boy?[/QUOTE]
I love them, a mix of social liberalism and fiscal responsibility that goes hand in hand with smaller government is the closest thing to individualism I believe.
[QUOTE='[LOA] SonofBrim;17114378']Nope, yet another problem with our criminal justice system.... personally i think more efforts should be focused on the murders, etc. I just think drugs should remain illegal.[/QUOTE]
fixed.
Whats with all the angry responses guys. I was merely stating something. No need to get your shanks out.
[QUOTE=Cowie1337;17114484]I love them, a mix of social liberalism and fiscal responsibility that goes hand in hand with smaller government is the closest thing to individualism I believe.[/QUOTE]
:smile:
[QUOTE=Cowie1337;17114495]Whats with all the angry responses guys. I was merely stating something. No need to get your shanks out.[/QUOTE]
I am in a shanking mood move bitch get out the way get out the way get out the way
Fuck I showed up too late
[QUOTE=Lankist;17114506]I am in a shanking mood move bitch get out the way get out the way get out the way[/QUOTE]
out the way motherfucker he's a mexican he's got shanking in his blood man
Hey guys. I think I can tell people what they can and can't do. If gays didn't exist, the world would be a better place. I mean, violence is committed against them, so if gays just didn't exist, this wouldn't be a problem. And video games too, I mean, columbine and VTech? Both happened because of video games, so no more video games.
There. The worlds a better place because I know what's good for people.
If no one got that, it was sarcasm. FFS.
[QUOTE=Lankist;17114506]I am in a shanking mood move bitch get out the way get out the way get out the way[/QUOTE]
It's funny because your avatar is a drunk mexican.
[QUOTE=b00ce;17114424]Fucking agree. Seriously, is it your business if some dude offs himself or does drugs? Is it your business if the guy driving down the street isn't wearing a seat belt? If you think it is, read tabloids about Brangelina and do breathing exercises into a paper bag instead of driving us up the walls with your nagging for things being "safer", taking away our rights in the process.[/QUOTE]
1/5 times if your house is burgalized the persons involved did it for money for which they can buy drugs. This effects everyone. Not wearing your seatbelt can effect others and your own life.
If only you got t-boned by a person not paying attention, and if you wearing your seatbelt you would be you were wearing it. You would be glad that their is a rule that requires you to wear one. How about if you t-bone someone and they didn't wear a seatbelt? Are you going to shrug it off and say it was their fault for not wearing a seatbelt? Or are you going to say you wish there was a rule that was enforced?
Allowing sucide to take place is unethical, everyone can be helped, and many people look back at their failed sucide attempts in disgust. (Not because they failed lol)
[QUOTE=Lankist;17114443]That was a contradictory statement. You can't even formulate a sensationalist non sequitur correctly.[/QUOTE]
Not quite sure what a sensationalist is, but I hope you got my point. Regulating and banning certain things is not thought crime and it isn't facism.
[QUOTE=Lankist;17114443]Maybe to someone like you who gets a boner from telling other people how to live their lives.[/QUOTE]
Maybe to the hundreds of thousands of people affected by drug related violence.
[QUOTE=Lankist;17114443]If we got rid of video games completely the world would be a much better place.[/QUOTE]
There has been no link between video games violence and real world violence. Extremely rare cases where the kid says "video games made me do it" do not count, as just about everything has an extremely rare case where if it was widespread it would make whatever that activity is to be very bad.
[quote=oecleus;17114541]1/5 times if your house is burgalized the persons involved did it for money for which they can buy drugs. This effects everyone. Not wearing your seatbelt can effect others and your own life.
If only you got t-boned by a person not paying attention, and if you wearing your seatbelt you would be you were wearing it. You would be glad that their is a rule that requires you to wear one. How about if you t-bone someone and they didn't wear a seatbelt? Are you going to shrug it off and say it was their fault for not wearing a seatbelt? Or are you going to say you wish there was a rule that was enforced?
Allowing sucide to take place is unethical, everyone can be helped, and many people look back at their failed sucide attempts in disgust. (not because they failed lol)
not quite sure what a sensationalist is, but i hope you got my point. Regulating and banning certain things is not thought crime and it isn't facism.
Maybe to the hundreds of thousands of people affected by drug related violence.
There has been no link between video games violence and real world violence. Extremely rare cases where the kid says "video games made me do it" do not count, as just about everything has an extremely rare case where if it was widespread it would make whatever that activity is to be very bad.[/quote]
yes.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;17114527]And video games too, I mean, columbine and VTech? [B]Both happened because of video games, so no more video games.[/B][/QUOTE]
No.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
