Laws shouldn't be based on morality - General

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133687]Why not? You sigma 1=infinity. 1.34251 is in there.[/QUOTE] You sigma 1 = infinity? What? Do you even understand the math involved in this?

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;17133695]You sigma 1 = infinity? What? Do you even understand the math involved in this?[/QUOTE] 1>infinity i mean. I have troubles with = and.. look you get it.

No, he doesn't. This is actually ridiculously retarded.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133718]1>infinity i mean. I have troubles with = and.. look you get it.[/QUOTE] You are not making sense I do not, in fact, get it

This is ridiculously hilarious

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133436]I mean .3333 lol my bad. You get the point. As for multiple universes, I believe they exist just as you may not believe they exist. Perhaps my morals push me to believe so.[/QUOTE] BELIEF IS BASED ON EVIDENCE. MORALS DON'T MAKE YOU BELIEVE THINGS WHEN THERE'S NO REASON TO BELIEVE THEM. fffffffff- Seriously, what's wrong with you? You make this stupid assumption that we can't learn anything about the world, even when we have [I]countless[/I] examples of objectively gathered knowledge being proven accurate during physical tests when said knowledge is applied. Not only that, but you don't know what fucking morals are. Here's a fucking clue for you to start out with, YOUR MORALS WILL NOT INFLUENCE YOUR JUDGMENT ON WHETHER OR NOT THERE ARE MULTIPLE UNIVERSES. THAT IS UNLESS YOU'RE SOME NONSENSICAL LOONY WHO FINDS MONO-UNIVERSE THEORY INHERENTLY WRONG. OH BUT I GUESS THAT''S POSSIBLE SEEING AS HOW OBJECTIVITY DOESN'T EXIST AND BLACK IS DUCK AND UP IS COW.

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;17133728]You are not making sense I do not, in fact, get it[/QUOTE] You use the sigma sign to show of all possible numbers between the bottom variable and the top variable. All possible numbers to infinity include fucked up fractions and decimal points.

[QUOTE=Lankist;17133733]This is ridiculously hilarious[/QUOTE] And horribly depressing for the less jaded of us.

Drug laws are there not only to stop people from running around like nutters, potentially causing harm to others while high, but also to deter gang operations. Making it illegal allows the police to interfere with deals gangs set up. I'm fairly certain we all can agree that most gangs are bad, and so dicking around with their financial stability is a good thing.

[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;17133745] Here's a fucking clue for you to start out with, YOUR MORALS WILL NOT INFLUENCE YOUR JUDGMENT ON WHETHER OR NOT THERE ARE MULTIPLE UNIVERSES. THAT IS UNLESS YOU'RE SOME NONSENSICAL LOONY WHO FINDS MONO-UNIVERSE THEORY INHERENTLY WRONG. OH BUT I GUESS THAT''S POSSIBLE SEEING AS HOW OBJECTIVITY DOESN'T EXIST AND BLACK IS DUCK AND UP IS COW.[/QUOTE] Your morals could include a belief in god which may affect if you believe in the possibility of another universe or if god just made one. Rather than just delving into what I say with a, "Oh man, I'm gonna get him so bad", give it a chance. It makes a lot more sense than you give it credit for.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133748]You use the sigma sign to show of all possible numbers between the bottom variable and the top variable. All possible numbers to infinity include fucked up fractions and decimal points.[/QUOTE] No, I use the sigma sign to show the sum of n-terms of the given sequence between the two bounds, but you can't have a non-integer term. Adding the first term to the "one-and-a-halfth" term doesn't make sense.

No. Just fucking no. As Mcguffin, Johny, Lanklist, fucking everyone said, you're wrong, and even your own view point says you're wrong. How can you believe else wise? You're contradicting yourself.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133468]Im saying I believe it to be so. Nothing is absolute, but I can have beliefs.[/QUOTE] Retarded, pointless, and unfounded as they are.

[QUOTE=StickyNade;17133752]Drug laws are there not only to stop people from running around like nutters, potentially causing harm to others while high, but also to deter gang operations. Making it illegal allows the police to interfere with deals gangs set up. I'm fairly certain we all can agree that most gangs are bad, and so dicking around with their financial stability is a good thing.[/QUOTE] Drug gangs would not exist if drugs were legal.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133762]Your morals could include a belief in god which may affect if you believe in the possibility of another universe or if god just made one. Rather than just delving into what I say with a, "Oh man, I'm gonna get him so bad", give it a chance. It makes a lot more sense than you give it credit for.[/QUOTE] How does God factor into it? Do you have some belief that the non existence of God is immoral? What shit are you smoking, because it must be some good shit. I have, it doesn't, you're an idiot.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133762]Your morals could include a belief in god which may affect if you believe in the possibility of another universe or if god just made one. Rather than just delving into what I say with a, "Oh man, I'm gonna get him so bad", give it a chance. It makes a lot more sense than you give it credit for.[/QUOTE] There's nothing to give a chance. You're essentially arguing that reality isn't reality.

[QUOTE=Lankist;17133774]Drug gangs would not exist if drugs were legal.[/QUOTE] what do you mean lankist, havent you heard about all them rum runners down in de moines?

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;17133765]No, I use the sigma sign to show the sum of n-terms of the given sequence between the two bounds, but you can't have a non-integer term. Adding the first term to the "one-and-a-halfth" term doesn't make sense.[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.math.montana.edu/frankw/ccp/general/sigma/sigma.gif[/img] All goes between them doens't it? I may be wrong, algebra was boring last year. [QUOTE=KingPurge;17133766]No. Just fucking no. As Mcguffin, Johny, Lanklist, fucking everyone said, you're wrong, and even your own view point says you're wrong. How can you believe else wise? You're contradicting yourself.[/QUOTE] I aint wrong.

[QUOTE=KingPurge;17133785]There's nothing to give a chance. You're essentially arguing that reality isn't reality.[/QUOTE] How many surrealists does it take to put in a lightbulb? Dead cow fetus.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133792][img]http://www.math.montana.edu/frankw/ccp/general/sigma/sigma.gif[/img] All goes between them doens't it? I may be wrong, algebra was boring last year.[/QUOTE] All whole numbers. Not all numbers.

[QUOTE=Lankist;17133774]Drug gangs would not exist if drugs were legal.[/QUOTE] Exactly! Think of all the poor drug gangs who's jobs you'd be ruining!

[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;17133780]How does God factor into it? Do you have some belief that the non existence of God is immoral? What shit are you smoking, because it must be some good shit. I have, it doesn't, you're an idiot.[/QUOTE] I've already said what I believe the term 'morals' means, what do YOU think it means? You say immoral, but what do YOU mean by that?

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133792][img]http://www.math.montana.edu/frankw/ccp/general/sigma/sigma.gif[/img] All goes between them doens't it? I may be wrong, algebra was boring last year. I aint wrong.[/QUOTE] Just because you don't think you are, doesn't make you wrong. How does someone possibly argue this? Your math is wrong, your view point is contradictory, and your idea and definition of morality is wrong.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133792]I aint wrong.[/QUOTE] What's that? You're wrong? Well, that's a relief! For a moment I thought someone that stupid actually existed.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133801]I've already said what I believe the term 'morals' means, what do YOU think it means? You say immoral, but what do YOU mean by that?[/QUOTE] While definitions are primarily objective, you can not be right. Morality has one defined meaning, more that also work, yours is not the definition of morality, you're just replacing words.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133792]I aint wrong.[/QUOTE] Denial does not constitute reality.

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;17133798]All whole numbers. Not all numbers.[/QUOTE] I thought it was all numbers? Weird. In which case I'd still say it is a math shortcut to solve for the supposedly unsolvable. An accepted belief, but it doesn't make it right in the grand scheme. But for my own purposes, sure, 3/3=1, however weird it is. [editline]01:20AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;17133806]What's that? You're wrong? Well, that's a relief! For a moment I thought someone that stupid actually existed.[/QUOTE] I gotta know what you think morals mean before i can answer your arguments.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133824]I thought it was all numbers? Weird. In which case I'd still say it is a math shortcut to solve for the supposedly unsolvable. An accepted belief, but it doesn't make it right in the grand scheme. But for my own purposes, sure, 3/3=1, however weird it is.[/QUOTE] sdkf;lksdjlkfj You're... Fuck it. There is no amount of idiocy that should exist as large as this.

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133801]I've already said what I believe the term 'morals' means, what do YOU think it means? You say immoral, but what do YOU mean by that?[/QUOTE] Morals are ones concepts of right and wrong you stupid bastard. [quote] * Main Entry: 1mor·al * Pronunciation: \ˈmȯr-əl, ˈmär-\ * Function: adjective * Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin moralis, from mor-, mos custom * Date: 14th century 1 a : of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ethical <moral judgments> b : expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior <a moral poem> c : conforming to a standard of right behavior d : sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment <a moral obligation> e : capable of right and wrong action <a moral agent>[/quote] [quote]mor⋅al   /ˈmɔrəl, ˈmɒr-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [mawr-uhl, mor-] Show IPA Use moral in a Sentence See web results for moral See images of moral –adjective 1. of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes. [/quote] [quote]moral Show phonetics adjective 1 relating to the standards of good or bad behaviour, fairness, honesty, etc. which each person believes in, rather than to laws: It's her moral obligation to tell the police what she knows. It is not part of a novelist's job to make a moral judgment. She was the only politician to condemn the proposed law on moral grounds (= for moral reasons). The Democrats are attempting to capture the moral high ground (= are trying to appear more honest and good than the other political parties). Compare amoral; immoral.[/quote]

[QUOTE=Neolk;17133824]An accepted belief, but it doesn't make it right in the grand scheme.[/QUOTE] Oh god, why do I bother. Oh right, because it's fun for me [editline]a[/editline] It's obviously fucking not unfuckingsolvable because I just fucking solved it