[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046235]Right, so they have the ability to tax us. I'm not disputing that fact. I'm simply stating that there is no law that says "You gotta pay yo income tax, bro"[/QUOTE]
It's an inherent power.
Have you ever [i]read[/i] the Constitution?
trolls aren't what they used to be :frown:
Well y'all can flame all you want, I was only making a statement. If you don't share my opinion that doesn't mean I'm an idiot. And Maybe I am wrong, but calling me stupid for sharing something that was presented to me as fact really isn't necessary. I mean, I understand you don't have anything better to do, but I'm new here, and one would think you could give me a break.
Silly America.
When will you learn?
[quote="I"][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Revenue_Code]The Internal Revenue Code (or IRC; more formally, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) is the main body of domestic statutory tax law of the United States organized topically, including laws covering the income tax (see Income tax in the United States), payroll taxes, gift taxes, estate taxes and statutory excise taxes. The Internal Revenue Code is published as Title 26 of the United States Code (USC), and is also known as the internal revenue title. Its governing authority is the Internal Revenue Service.[/url][/quote]
Here you are.
I respectfully concede. I guess sharing ideas is frowned upon here, so I'll just be off then.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046523]Well y'all can flame all you want, I was only making a statement. [B]If you don't share my opinion that doesn't mean I'm an idiot.[/B] And Maybe I am wrong, but calling me stupid for sharing something that was presented to me as fact really isn't necessary. I mean, I understand you don't have anything better to do, but I'm new here, and one would think you could give me a break.[/QUOTE]
In this situation that's the primary contributing factor to the reason people are calling you an idiot. We've posted Federal Documents.
You posted a movie.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046592]I respectfully concede. I guess sharing ideas is frowned upon here, so I'll just be off then.[/QUOTE]
If only you would.
[QUOTE=Daolpu;18046608]In this situation that's the primary contributing factor to the reason people are calling you an idiot. We've posted Federal Documents.
You posted a movie.[/QUOTE]
I posted a movie web site in which the sources for the statements in the movie are verified.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046032]I'm not a troll, the film is a documentary, and there are confirmed cited sources.[/QUOTE]
The cited sources include books such as "The IllumiNAZI - who's really behind America!"
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046656]I posted a movie web site in which the sources for the statements in the movie are verified.[/QUOTE]
Instead of posting the website, cut out the middleman and post the sources.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046656]I posted a movie web site in which the sources for the statements in the movie are verified.[/QUOTE]
We posted Federal. Docutments. You know like, laws. The things that the Government Establishes then archives in Federal libraries for review and enforcement.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046235]Right, so they have the ability to tax us. I'm not disputing that fact. I'm simply stating that there is no law that says "You gotta pay yo income tax, bro"[/QUOTE]
You're right, you don't have to. You can go to jail instead.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046592]I respectfully concede. I guess sharing ideas is frowned upon here, so I'll just be off then.[/QUOTE]
Sharing [i]conspiracy[/i]-type ideas is frowned upon. No Zeitgeist, no Loose Change, no Alex Jones. There are enough "sources" on either side of the argument, that whichever side you believe in, you can justify it, therefore arguments get nowhere. In this case though, it's pretty clear-cut. Income tax is the law.
[QUOTE=Tu154M;18046628]If only you would.[/QUOTE]
If I were blindly defending a position I knew nothing about, I would understand your persistent pursuit of mocking me. On the contrary, I admitted I may very well be wrong, and I conceded. Now you're just trying to belittle me for amusement and the approval of your peers. It's really not necessary.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046818]If I were blindly defending a position I knew nothing about, I would understand your persistent pursuit of mocking me. On the contrary, I admitted I may very well be wrong, and I conceded. Now you're just trying to belittle me for amusement and the approval of your peers. It's really not necessary.[/QUOTE]
:v:
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046818]If I were blindly defending a position I knew nothing about, I would understand your persistent pursuit of mocking me. On the contrary, I admitted I may very well be wrong, and I conceded. Now you're just trying to belittle me for amusement and the approval of your peers. It's really not necessary.[/QUOTE]
internet: serious business
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046818]If I were blindly defending a position I knew nothing about, I would understand your persistent pursuit of mocking me. On the contrary, I admitted I may very well be wrong, and I conceded. Now you're just trying to belittle me for amusement and the approval of your peers. It's really not necessary.[/QUOTE]
Yes, but it is fucking funny.
This is the kind of response I would expect from 4chan, not facepunch.
Welcome to facechan
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046953]This is the kind of response I would expect from 4chan, not facepunch.
Welcome to facechan[/QUOTE]
Everyone was supposed to agree with you right?
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046592]I respectfully concede. I guess sharing ideas is frowned upon here, so I'll just be off then.[/QUOTE]
May i just remind you of what you said earlier?
Just using big expressions and acting all pseudo intellectual doesn't make your opinion superior. Everything that can be proven wrong has been proven wrong and i hope to speak on the behalf of Facepunch when i say: GTFO
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046953]This is the kind of response I would expect from 4chan, not facepunch.
Welcome to facechan[/QUOTE]
Well to be fair, you just posted "Something that is a law isn't actually a law!". If you'd posted an opinion such as "I don't think we should be forced to pay income tax" then that position is more defensible but you're just plain wrong, and once you're proven wrong there's really only one way the thread can go.
Put it another way: If it wasn't legal, then why would anyone still be paying it?
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046953]This is the kind of response I would expect from 4chan, not facepunch.
Welcome to facechan[/QUOTE]
No this is pretty much the standard response from Facepunch. Try making a thread about religion or go to In the News and comment about how Health Care reform is Socialistic and you'll get a face full of what you got in this thread.
No, we have to pay taxes.
Otherwise everything falls apart.
[QUOTE=Splurgy;18047073]Put it another way: If it wasn't legal, then why would anyone still be paying it?[/QUOTE]
Because of the mass mind control :tinfoil:
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18046523]Well y'all can flame all you want, I was only making a statement. If you don't share my opinion that doesn't mean I'm an idiot. And Maybe I am wrong, but calling me stupid for sharing something that was presented to me as fact really isn't necessary. I mean, I understand you don't have anything better to do, but I'm new here, and one would think you could give me a break.[/QUOTE]
No you're stupid, there's no two ways about it.
I guess admitting that your stance is in fact flawed and conceding doesn't mean anything when you're dealing with children. In a typical civilized conversation, if I made a statement that was incorrect, one might say something like "well that's not right, I've seen the evidence to the contrary," not "no you're wrong and stupid." I don't hold it against you, I hold it against your (likely related) parents for not teaching you manners. Now I know not to try to hold even semi-intellectual discussions on the internet. Good day.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18047326]I guess admitting that your stance is in fact flawed and conceding doesn't mean anything when you're dealing with children. In a typical civilized conversation, if I made a statement that was incorrect, one might say something like "well that's not right, I've seen the evidence to the contrary," not "no you're wrong and stupid." I don't hold it against you, I hold it against your (likely related) parents for not teaching you manners. [B]Now I know not to try to hold even semi-intellectual discussions on the internet.[/B] Good day.[/QUOTE]
You totally skipped Internet Basic Training.
[QUOTE=ForceKin;18047326]I guess admitting that your stance is in fact flawed and conceding doesn't mean anything when you're dealing with children. In a typical civilized conversation, if I made a statement that was incorrect, one might say something like "well that's not right, I've seen the evidence to the contrary," not "no you're wrong and stupid." I don't hold it against you, I hold it against your (likely related) parents for not teaching you manners. Now I know not to try to hold even semi-intellectual discussions on the internet. Good day.[/QUOTE]
By the way: Trying to act smart doesn't get you anywhere on Facepunch. Have a pleasant stay!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
