Should the media be allowed to make suspects' names public?

[BigOwl]

All of these rules apply to anyone except Fox news.

[henrietta]

I think they should.
[i]If you can't handle the humiliation, don't do the crime.[/i]

[Darth_GW7]

[QUOTE=henrietta;29761129]I think they should.
[i]If you can't handle the humiliation, don't do the crime.[/i][/QUOTE]
Wow you are stupid, did you even read the OP?

Sometimes they're not even guilty in the end.

[TH89]

[QUOTE=henrietta;29761129]I think they should.
[i]If you can't handle the humiliation, don't do the crime.[/i][/QUOTE]

Hi, do you know the difference between a suspect and a convict?

[kaven]

snip

[henrietta]

[QUOTE=TH89;29761257]Hi, do you know the difference between a suspect and a convict?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=kaven;29761367]So you think that a person that might be innocent deserves to have his/hers reputation and maybe even life destroyed just because you SUSPECT that they did a crime?[/QUOTE]

No. Sorry, I didn't comprehend the thread. I deserve the boxes.

[Archangel125]

No, the Media should not be able to release the names of suspects, because they have not been proven guilty, and it may lead to the reputation of an innocent person being ruined. I thought this was obvious.

[Darth_GW7]

Obviously not obvious enou- wait, let me rephrase that so it sounds less retarded.

Clearly not obvious enough because we haven't banned the use of suspects' names.

[Instant Mix]

No. What if the media find out the suspect that they said was running from the police or whatever didn't do the crime at all?

lots of shit he's going to have weighing him down for something he didn't commit