• Fucking crazy russians-The K-7 bomber
    219 replies, posted
*cough* spruce goose *cough* [IMG]http://johngushue.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/spruce_goose.jpg[/IMG]
What about land-vehicles? Cause i dont think this thread can contain this many gigantic planes.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;26326680]What about land-vehicles? Cause i dont think this thread can contain this many gigantic planes.[/QUOTE] This is about all there is for large land-mobile entities. [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Bagger-garzweiler.jpg[/img_thumb]
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26326782]This is about all there is for large land-mobile entities. [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Bagger-garzweiler.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] Now imagine forming a small army, taking over that thing, and driving it towards a city.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;26326814]Now imagine forming a small army, taking over that thing, and driving it towards a city.[/QUOTE] It travels at 2-10 meters per minute. A five foot hill would stop it dead.
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26326870]It travels at 2-10 meters per minute. A five foot hill would stop it dead.[/QUOTE] Hmm. Attach the K-7 bomber to it.
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26326870]It travels at 2-10 meters per minute. A five foot hill would stop it dead.[/QUOTE] add a few more jet engines and it will have no problem.
Russians are planning a new plane, which when completed will be the largest plane ever. Be-2500 [IMG]http://planetagadget.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/be-2500.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;26326291]I demand that these crazy-ass Russians make another huge plane. It should be the size of the Allure of the Seas. That would be insanely badass.[/QUOTE] Was it really Russian or Ukrainian?
[QUOTE=fredstin22;26328240]Two weird russian planes [img_thumb]http://i51.tinypic.com/290pgg7.jpg[/img_thumb] Russians.[/QUOTE] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle[/url] It's basically a troop transport.
[QUOTE=gufu;26328367][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle[/url] It's basically a troop transport.[/QUOTE] The soviets developed them for anti-submarine purposes.
[QUOTE=Dragon Master;26315980]it's funny...cuz when that plane was in use, america lost the war they were fighting... :v:[/QUOTE]Actually, the B-36 never dropped bombs in active operations. It was also put out of service before the Vietnam War, and the US forces didn't lose the Korean War.
[QUOTE=fredstin22;26328240] [img_thumb]http://i52.tinypic.com/2v29uv8.jpg[/img_thumb] Russians.[/QUOTE] looks like a regular biplane but with retardowings
[QUOTE=fredstin22;26328240][img_thumb]http://i51.tinypic.com/290pgg7.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] Why does one of the engines have a cage around it?
That thing would rape you!
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26328581]Why does one of the engines have a cage around it?[/QUOTE] since it's flying so close to ground, I guess t's to fend off debris and such.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;26326680]What about land-vehicles? [/QUOTE] Well, Third Reich is a winner by the number of such projects. For example Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/P1500_Monster.gif[/IMG] But of course it would never have done IRL And what about russians flying giants... hmm, "Ilya Murometz" was a real, first big battle-plane [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/Ilya_Muromets_flying.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=3v3ryb0dy;26328615]since it's flying so close to ground, I guess t's to fend off debris and such.[/QUOTE] Well no durp, but only ONE of them has it. [editline]27th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=KirilloTRON;26328762]Well, Third Reich is a winner by the number of such projects. For example Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/P1500_Monster.gif[/img_thumb] But of course it would never have done IRL[/QUOTE] Quit bringing this up, it's not some long lost secret no one has ever heard of.
Why do Russians insist on putting jet engines next to their cockpits?
:gizz:
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26328795]Well no durp, but only ONE of them has it. [editline]27th November 2010[/editline] Quit bringing this up, it's not some long lost secret no one has ever heard of.[/QUOTE]oh you silly, look at it, it's old as fuck. rest have just gone missing or aren't installed.
[QUOTE=fredstin22;26328240]Two weird russian planes [img_thumb]http://i51.tinypic.com/290pgg7.jpg[/img_thumb] Russians.[/QUOTE] I believe that this one is a submarine plane.
I think every major government from 1910 up until the end of the cold war had penis size issues.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;26329985]I believe that this one is a submarine plane.[/QUOTE] Riight. And France is the capital of Europe.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;26329985]I believe that this one is a submarine plane.[/QUOTE] It's ekranoplan, as I remember.
[QUOTE=KirilloTRON;26330492]It's ekranoplane, as I remember.[/QUOTE] There is no term such as ekranoplane, comrade
Are you so sure about this? [IMG]http://www.airwar.ru/image/idop/xplane/vva14/vva14-7.jpg[/IMG] [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSYmSnpQ360[/url]
"Экраноплан" - russian term. However, "ekranoplane" is no more than a transcription of a Russian term. That's what I'm talking about. Let's call it a flying submarine :v:
Well, I don't really keep my eye, on the progress of this word transcription. And Wiki never lies :v: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lun-class_ekranoplan[/url] UPD: Oh, I get it. Now it's "Ground effect vehicle" :pseudo: But i think ekranoplan sounds cooler.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;26329985]I believe that this one is a submarine plane.[/QUOTE] Jet engines don't quite work underwater.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.