What about land-vehicles?
Cause i dont think this thread can contain this many gigantic planes.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;26326680]What about land-vehicles?
Cause i dont think this thread can contain this many gigantic planes.[/QUOTE]
This is about all there is for large land-mobile entities.
[img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Bagger-garzweiler.jpg[/img_thumb]
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26326782]This is about all there is for large land-mobile entities.
[img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Bagger-garzweiler.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
Now imagine forming a small army, taking over that thing, and driving it towards a city.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;26326814]Now imagine forming a small army, taking over that thing, and driving it towards a city.[/QUOTE]
It travels at 2-10 meters per minute.
A five foot hill would stop it dead.
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26326870]It travels at 2-10 meters per minute.
A five foot hill would stop it dead.[/QUOTE]
Hmm.
Attach the K-7 bomber to it.
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26326870]It travels at 2-10 meters per minute.
A five foot hill would stop it dead.[/QUOTE]
add a few more jet engines and it will have no problem.
Russians are planning a new plane, which when completed will be the largest plane ever.
Be-2500
[IMG]http://planetagadget.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/be-2500.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;26326291]I demand that these crazy-ass Russians make another huge plane. It should be the size of the Allure of the Seas. That would be insanely badass.[/QUOTE]
Was it really Russian or Ukrainian?
[QUOTE=gufu;26328367][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle[/url]
It's basically a troop transport.[/QUOTE]
The soviets developed them for anti-submarine purposes.
[QUOTE=Dragon Master;26315980]it's funny...cuz when that plane was in use, america lost the war they were fighting... :v:[/QUOTE]Actually, the B-36 never dropped bombs in active operations. It was also put out of service before the Vietnam War, and the US forces didn't lose the Korean War.
[QUOTE=fredstin22;26328240]
[img_thumb]http://i52.tinypic.com/2v29uv8.jpg[/img_thumb]
Russians.[/QUOTE]
looks like a regular biplane but with retardowings
[QUOTE=fredstin22;26328240][img_thumb]http://i51.tinypic.com/290pgg7.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
Why does one of the engines have a cage around it?
That thing would rape you!
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26328581]Why does one of the engines have a cage around it?[/QUOTE]
since it's flying so close to ground, I guess t's to fend off debris and such.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;26326680]What about land-vehicles?
[/QUOTE]
Well, Third Reich is a winner by the number of such projects.
For example Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/P1500_Monster.gif[/IMG]
But of course it would never have done IRL
And what about russians flying giants...
hmm, "Ilya Murometz" was a real, first big battle-plane
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/Ilya_Muromets_flying.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=3v3ryb0dy;26328615]since it's flying so close to ground, I guess t's to fend off debris and such.[/QUOTE]
Well no durp, but only ONE of them has it.
[editline]27th November 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=KirilloTRON;26328762]Well, Third Reich is a winner by the number of such projects.
For example Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster
[img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/P1500_Monster.gif[/img_thumb]
But of course it would never have done IRL[/QUOTE]
Quit bringing this up, it's not some long lost secret no one has ever heard of.
Why do Russians insist on putting jet engines next to their cockpits?
:gizz:
[QUOTE=mastermaul;26328795]Well no durp, but only ONE of them has it.
[editline]27th November 2010[/editline]
Quit bringing this up, it's not some long lost secret no one has ever heard of.[/QUOTE]oh you silly, look at it, it's old as fuck. rest have just gone missing or aren't installed.
[QUOTE=fredstin22;26328240]Two weird russian planes
[img_thumb]http://i51.tinypic.com/290pgg7.jpg[/img_thumb]
Russians.[/QUOTE]
I believe that this one is a submarine plane.
I think every major government from 1910 up until the end of the cold war had penis size issues.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;26329985]I believe that this one is a submarine plane.[/QUOTE]
Riight. And France is the capital of Europe.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;26329985]I believe that this one is a submarine plane.[/QUOTE]
It's ekranoplan, as I remember.
[QUOTE=KirilloTRON;26330492]It's ekranoplane, as I remember.[/QUOTE]
There is no term such as ekranoplane, comrade
Are you so sure about this?
[IMG]http://www.airwar.ru/image/idop/xplane/vva14/vva14-7.jpg[/IMG]
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSYmSnpQ360[/url]
"Экраноплан" - russian term. However, "ekranoplane" is no more than a transcription of a Russian term. That's what I'm talking about.
Let's call it a flying submarine :v:
Well, I don't really keep my eye, on the progress of this word transcription.
And Wiki never lies :v:
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lun-class_ekranoplan[/url]
UPD:
Oh, I get it. Now it's "Ground effect vehicle" :pseudo:
But i think ekranoplan sounds cooler.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;26329985]I believe that this one is a submarine plane.[/QUOTE]
Jet engines don't quite work underwater.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.