I'm not sure what the opposite of a fanboy would be called, but this thread, actually every CoD thread in existence, is full of 'em
The only game that can be blindly hated for not innovating and innovating at the same time.
[QUOTE=I_love_garrysmod;35801317]I'm not sure what the opposite of a fanboy would be called, but this thread, actually every CoD thread in existence, is full of 'em
The only game that can be blindly hated for not innovating and innovating at the same time.[/QUOTE]
what the fuck are you talking about, facepunch hates call of duty and the fact for it to have this many people interested in it is an absolute rarity
[QUOTE=DesumThePanda;35800909]and it said "this is a flashback from the 80's" where? It could have been a list of many other things, how do we know that it's a flashback judging only by the video?[/QUOTE]
are you retarded? Gee, horses, old trucks and A FUCKING HIND, sure isn't a flashback xd
please no game breaking killstreaks or unbalanced weapons
[editline]3rd May 2012[/editline]
or $15 dlc
If they made this into a very deep and structural series of books (like 8-12 intertwined books) without all the explosions. I might be interested.
jesus fucking christ when are they going to update the graphics from 2007 my god
[QUOTE=adam1172;35794535]The graphic quality is pretty low for a 2012 game.[/QUOTE]
The graphic would be really good.
For a 2007 game.
[editline]3rd May 2012[/editline]
Then again, It's really not about the graphics. I'll follow this one.
[QUOTE=Pandamox;35805320]jesus fucking christ when are they going to update the graphics from 2007 my god[/QUOTE]
Jeez guys its really not that bad.
And on the note of graphics, does anyone know why my eyes feel like they are burning out of my skull after playing Black Ops for a couple minuets? I swear I only do this with CoD games.
[QUOTE=mixshifter;35804230]what the fuck are you talking about, facepunch hates call of duty and the fact for it to have this many people interested in it is an absolute rarity[/QUOTE]
Yep, clearly my point. Opposite of a fanboy
[QUOTE=I_love_garrysmod;35813090]Yep, clearly my point. Opposite of a fanboy[/QUOTE]
No, they just did something different for once, and now it has more people interested. How is that the opposite of being a fanboy?
Good, I loved the direction they went in with Black Ops although it was nowhere as radical as this.
[QUOTE=Pandamox;35805320]jesus fucking christ when are they going to update the graphics from 2007 my god[/QUOTE]
The graphics look a lot better this go around. It seems like they've actually updated it.
[QUOTE=simkas;35795881]The main bad guy is called Raoul Menendez. That doesn't sound russian to me.[/QUOTE]
HUE HUE HUE HUE HUE HUE HUE HUE
BR? BR! GIBE ME UAVS PLOS
I really haven't liked Treyarch; Infinity ward is a lot better :D
Having said that, MW3 was awful. Shame because MW and MW2 were fantastic
Quake 3 engine.
Think about that for a while.
Hmm...if what they say about the Campaign really is true(about how the story can branch into different directions) then it might actually warrant multiple campaign playthroughs.
Co-Op campaign would make me raise my eye.
Apart from that, I'm not interested :\
Actually, it doesn't look too bad. Still, gameplay is obviously needed to make a proper judgement.
Deus Metal Gears of Modern Warfield 2025
[editline]4th May 2012[/editline]
I don't even know what to think of this
[QUOTE=Revan564;35814510]No, they just did something different for once, and now it has more people interested. How is that the opposite of being a fanboy?[/QUOTE]
I'm talking about how they hate the game just because it gets so much attention. Usually when you dislike something you should ignore it and let everyone do their thing, but these guys feel the need to make countless posts bashing the series.
I still don't understand why everyone is bashing on this game already. They went with a different approach, yet everyone is still "GRAPHICS SUCK" "I CAN TELL THE GAME IS GOING TO SUCK BECAUSE OF A 3 MINUTE VIDEO". It really seems to me that no one here has ever fully played a CoD game, or has tried it for a while with the whole "CoD sucks no matter what" mentality.
[QUOTE=VitaminAG;35819077]I still don't understand why everyone is bashing on this game already. They went with a different approach, yet everyone is still "GRAPHICS SUCK" "I CAN TELL THE GAME IS GOING TO SUCK BECAUSE OF A 3 MINUTE VIDEO". It really seems to me that no one here has ever fully played a CoD game, or has tried it for a while with the whole "CoD sucks no matter what" mentality.[/QUOTE]
Let them bitch and whine, all it does is makes them look like they lack the maturity to ignore something they dislike.
+1 billion dollars to Activision.
[QUOTE=VitaminAG;35819077]I still don't understand why everyone is bashing on this game already. They went with a different approach, yet everyone is still "GRAPHICS SUCK" "I CAN TELL THE GAME IS GOING TO SUCK BECAUSE OF A 3 MINUTE VIDEO". It really seems to me that no one here has ever fully played a CoD game, or has tried it for a while with the whole "CoD sucks no matter what" mentality.[/QUOTE]
I don't like it because I gave up on COD after MW2, it was stale and boring and the fans only got more annoying and games got more identical and it was just another generic bullshit simulator.
BO2 just seems like its going to be the same old crap but with a new paint job, see a few robots in the background here, shoot a few pew pew guns there, sit in a futurecopter for a few minutes.
I can already tell the horses are just for the trailer, just like the famous snowmobile they made it just to get people excited.
I'm just not sure what to think after years of identical games then something different, BO1 was set in the past, didn't make a single god damn difference.
To all of the people that thinks the gameplay will be a rehash: Of course the core gameplay is going to feel the same a bit. From what I hear, they're trying to polish the class system and killstreaks. I can think of five games right off the bat that had the same core gameplay throughout its sequels and still was praised. Half-Life and Halo being two of them. They don't want to ruin the COD formula and are trying to make an adequate game at the same time.
i like it because they are kinda unrestricted story and tech wise. I hope they keep that like behind the scenes kinda story that was in blops.
Something doesn't sit right with me. It looks like theyve ripped a load of futuristic concepts from other games/movies, then thrown them together with modern world places and people.
Now DICE will be forced to make Battlefield 2143!
[QUOTE=Nemisis116;35821149]I don't like it because I gave up on COD after MW2, it was stale and boring and the fans only got more annoying and games got more identical and it was just another generic bullshit simulator.
BO2 just seems like its going to be the same old crap but with a new paint job, see a few robots in the background here, shoot a few pew pew guns there, sit in a futurecopter for a few minutes.
I can already tell the horses are just for the trailer, just like the famous snowmobile they made it just to get people excited.
I'm just not sure what to think after years of identical games then something different, BO1 was set in the past, didn't make a single god damn difference.[/QUOTE]
Either way, it keeps people entertained for a good while.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
