If I can joust on the horse I'll buy it just for that.
Welp I'm now pretty fucking hyped
[video=youtube;iKiwJi44CgY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKiwJi44CgY[/video]
Hm, still not gonna buy it. But thank god they hopefully make some changes.
I am extremely disappointed, I wanted to ride a giant robot hippo made of steel and cookie dough in this next CoD installment.
Treyarch loses, never going to buy it, 0/10, worst game of the year, scrub n00b shit.
I might actually buy this. Looks awesome, but I'll wait for more trailers and gameplays.
My honest opinion is that I think the campaign will be great, but multiplayer the same thing with few new additions.
[QUOTE=343N;35792604]My honest opinion is that I think the campaign will be great, but multiplayer the same thing with few new additions.[/QUOTE]
The rumor is that they are going to alienate a lot of fans of the series who just want more guns, and new maps.
[QUOTE=Fish Muffin;35791408]Premise looks interesting but holy shit those graphics look god awful, it looks like it was made in 2004.[/QUOTE]
That's because they need to have this running at 60 FPS on consoles. I think they do a great job at balancing graphics and performance
[QUOTE=Demolitions2;35792856]The rumor is that they are going to alienate a lot of fans of the series who just want more guns, and new maps.[/QUOTE]
Fuck em
Please have vehicles in this game. It worked in CODUO.
[QUOTE=Demolitions2;35792856]The rumor is that they are going to alienate a lot of fans of the series who just want more guns, and new maps.[/QUOTE]
If that happens and they get less profit than the last CoD, I can only worry what will happen next with this franchise. I guess they'll blame it on the innovations and goodbye to seeing CoD ever reworked.
Would be awesome if the multiplayer was like the Strike Force missions but with everyone being an actual player.
Gotta give them one thing. When you look at a screenshot you will know which CoD it is.
But I have very negative experience with treyarch. When they released BO it was so bugged on PC that it was completely unplayable for half of the players for weeks. There was a giant flamewar on their forums but no posts from treyarch. Instead they were tweeting how many zombies they've killed on xbox. After I watched all the trailers and commentaries for BO I thought "wow this is gonna be good". How much I regret buying BO... Not falling for it this time.
[QUOTE=Demolitions2;35792856]The rumor is that they are going to alienate a lot of fans of the series who just want more guns, and new maps.[/QUOTE]
Oh man but where will I get my fill of kids screaming and fucking retards with their headsets next to their TVs???
They realized that the Modern Warfare part of their current games wouldn't hold up much longer due to the great dissapointment of MW3. So treyarch sat down and tried to be creative for once.
I bet there will be flashback missions in the campaign(As indicated by the trailer) that will explain what happened to Mason, Weaver, and the guy with the sunglasses(I bet Mason will probably end up dying), how Woods survived his "death" in BO1, and to explain why the bad guy is doing what he is in the game.
I actually have hope for this game.
a reskinned CoD is not enough for me to be hyped
Come, there's still room on the bandwagon!
shit son, I was just expecting 60's Red Paranoia with more 80's stuff, not shootier and bluer Deus Ex
this actually looks reasonably interesting, what the hell
People complaining about CoD gameplay need to learn a few things about game design
It seems that Treyarch will actually try to pull off something good, but I'll continue to be skeptical based on prior experiences.
Gonna follow on news about it though.
I'm actually somewhat interested in this game. Treyarch, please don't follow in Infinity Ward's shit-stained steps. Please make this game fun.
Holy shit, Russians aren't the bad guys in this one?
[QUOTE=Jund;35793628]People complaining about CoD gameplay need to learn a few things about game design[/QUOTE]
here is CoD's game design
make guns
test guns so they are somewhat balanced
ship game out
[QUOTE=Ezhik;35793760]Holy shit, Russians aren't the bad guys in this one?[/QUOTE]
According to the details in the article,
they are. v:v:v
[QUOTE=Novangel;35793817]According to the details in the article,
they are. v:v:v[/QUOTE]
No they're not. US is at a cold war with China and the main bad guy is spanish or mexican or something.
[editline]2nd May 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Bbarnes005;35793382]I bet there will be flashback missions in the campaign(As indicated by the trailer) that will explain what happened to Mason, Weaver, and the guy with the sunglasses(I bet Mason will probably end up dying), how Woods survived his "death" in BO1, and to explain why the bad guy is doing what he is in the game. [/QUOTE]
That is confirmed, one of them being in the afghanistan war.
October 2012:
EA proudly presents Battlefield 2143.
[QUOTE=simkas;35793837]No they're not. US is at a cold war with China and the main bad guy is spanish or mexican or something.
[editline]2nd May 2012[/editline]
That is confirmed, one of them being in the afghanistan war.[/QUOTE]
Sorry didn't wanna read too much into it but I thought it said the horse mission is set in a raid against Russian forces disguising as locals and stuff.
ew, it looks like shittier ghost recon
I hoped for spaceships and shit
[QUOTE=Novangel;35793893]Sorry didn't wanna read too much into it but I thought it said the horse mission is set in a raid against Russian forces disguising as locals and stuff.[/QUOTE]
Well in that part yeah, sure, it is afghanistan afterall, you know, a conflict that russians were actually in?
Where did you read that though? I don't see that anywhere.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
