[QUOTE=Doc OC;16754361][URL=http://filesmelt.com/][IMG]http://filesmelt.com/downloader/endlesscycle.png[/IMG][/URL]
[i]Still[/i] a work in progress.[/QUOTE]
Photoshop tablet painting? If so, awesome.
[QUOTE=Doc OC;16754361] *sniper*
[i]Still[/i] a work in progress.[/QUOTE]
The ears are still on different heights.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLsuPM6v0IY[/media]
Here's some progress on my game some more. Still not worth a thread. If I made one, it'd cause people to wait for it. This would make me hurry up thus lowering the quality of the game in speed of a fast beta release.
[QUOTE=Namelezz!;16758293][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLsuPM6v0IY[/media]
Here's some progress on my game some more. Still not worth a thread. If I made one, it'd cause people to wait for it. This would make me hurry up thus lowering the quality of the game in speed of a fast beta release.[/QUOTE]
That looks awesome.
[QUOTE=dgg;16743186]I have the Nikon D60. And yeah, toggle switch on the objective.
That would be Nikon's A. [b]Nikon's S for shutter priority[/b]
That would be Nikons P.[B]Nikon's A for Aperture priority[/b]
Don't got that. S on Nikon is like auto, you just chose if you want it under- correctly- or overexposed (adjust it to the dots and the values follows). [B]That is Nikon's P for program mode, it's similar to auto but gives you control over flash, ISO and WB[/B][/QUOTE]
fixed
I suppose I shall say: "I suppose I shall contribute."
[IMG]http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj255/matthew-is-army/barracks.jpg[/IMG]
Took that with a disposable camera on Schofield Barracks. (Oahu, Hawaii)
If the image is too big then I'll take it down and just provide the link.
[QUOTE=beatzdawg;16759632]fixed[/QUOTE]
No. I checked that whilst holding my camera in the hand.
P let's you chose your aperture and the shutter is auto adjustet.
S let's you chose your shutter speed and the aperture is auto adjusted.
A let's you have it correctly exposed to your liking with the shutter and aperture auto adjusting itself to be correct when you chose higher or lower numbers. Holding in the button that you use for changing aperture brings up the exposure levels which you can adjust if you WANT your picture overexposed.
And I just checked that whilst writing it.
Haha, silly Nikon users.
Cannon is where its at.
[QUOTE=peabrain101;16761975]Haha, silly Nikon users.
Cannon is where its at.[/QUOTE]
Whatever dude.
It's not like there's a whole lot of difference.
They both take quality pictures, does anything else even matter?
[QUOTE=--Adio--;16762207]Whatever dude.
It's not like there's a whole lot of difference.
They both take quality pictures, does anything else even matter?[/QUOTE]
It's all about personal preference on UI etc.
Pentax is decent too.
[img]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/cee400albumcoveryou.png[/img]
Got bored, made an album cover. Original image is from google someplace.
[QUOTE=dgg;16761472]No. I checked that whilst holding my camera in the hand.
P let's you chose your aperture and the shutter is auto adjustet.
S let's you chose your shutter speed and the aperture is auto adjusted.
A let's you have it correctly exposed to your liking with the shutter and aperture auto adjusting itself to be correct when you chose higher or lower numbers. Holding in the button that you use for changing aperture brings up the exposure levels which you can adjust if you WANT your picture overexposed.
And I just checked that whilst writing it.[/QUOTE]
no, you're wrong
[QUOTE=dgg;16761472]No. I checked that whilst holding my camera in the hand.
P let's you chose your aperture and the shutter is auto adjustet.
S let's you chose your shutter speed and the aperture is auto adjusted.
A let's you have it correctly exposed to your liking with the shutter and aperture auto adjusting itself to be correct when you chose higher or lower numbers. Holding in the button that you use for changing aperture brings up the exposure levels which you can adjust if you WANT your picture overexposed.
And I just checked that whilst writing it.[/QUOTE]
Nope, I am still right.
[QUOTE=toxicpiano;16772643]no, you're wrong[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=beatzdawg;16772690]Nope, I am still right.[/QUOTE]
Then tell me why the fuck my camera is like that then. My NIKON D60.
I've now manually checked it three times with my Nikon D60 and what I said is what my camera does on those settings.
[QUOTE=peabrain101;16761975]Haha, silly Nikon users.
Cannon is where its at.[/QUOTE]
It's like MAC vs PC. It's only about preference these days.
[QUOTE=dgg;16773081]Then tell me why the fuck my camera is like that then. My NIKON D60.
I've now manually checked it three times with my Nikon D60 and what I said is what my camera does on those settings.
It's like MAC vs PC. It's only about preference these days.[/QUOTE]
I just picked up my D40 and checked, said you were wrong.
I also just grabbed my D60, said you were wrong.
As did the manual.
But yes, it's all about your personal preference and what you expect from UI, these days. Sure one brand might throw on a perk of sorts, but when it boils down to it, it's UI. The megapixel race is over, nobody ever needs more than 10-12 megapixels in a DSLR.
And anyone who says "NIKON OR CANON EVERYTHING ELSE IS SHIT" is pretty ignorant. They're just repeating what they've heard others say endlessly. Pentax still makes good cameras. You can buy a good Olympus camera as well.
However, Nikon and Canon, due to their overwhelming popularity, do have the biggest collection of lenses available.
[QUOTE=dgg;16773081]Then tell me why the fuck my camera is like that then. My NIKON D60.
I've now manually checked it three times with my Nikon D60 and what I said is what my camera does on those settings.
It's like MAC vs PC. It's only about preference these days.[/QUOTE]
Maybe your camera dial is broken or something :v:
[IMG]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b294/toxicpiano/DSC_0603Panorama.jpg[/IMG]
One day I will make a thread with all my stuff
[QUOTE=peabrain101;16761975]Haha, silly Nikon users.
Cannon is where its at.[/QUOTE]
you mean Canon
and they're both as good as the other.
[editline]12:22PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=toxicpiano;16777690][IMG_thumb]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b294/toxicpiano/DSC_0603Panorama.jpg[/IMG_thumb]
One day I will make a thread with all my stuff[/QUOTE]
beautiful panoramic, can't see the seams, what do you do?
[QUOTE=M_B;16778721]you mean Canon
and they're both as good as the other.
[editline]12:22PM[/editline]
beautiful panoramic, can't see the seems, what do you do?[/QUOTE]
thanks, I run them through a dedicated stitching program called PTGui (it's a lot better than PS automerge because you have a lot of control)
[QUOTE=beatzdawg;16777526]Maybe your camera dial is broken or something :v:[/QUOTE]
Could be.
I chose P, and when I scroll with the... Uh... Scroller the F (aperture) is the number that changes and the shutter adjustes to it.
I needed a nice, simple background for my personal use, so I made this. I just call it "sky"
it's pretty big, 1680x1050
[media]http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/3184/skyc.png[/media]
not that great but it's good enough for me
[QUOTE=dgg;16779612]Could be.
I chose P, and when I scroll with the... Uh... Scroller the F (aperture) is the number that changes and the shutter adjustes to it.[/QUOTE]
When you choose P you can adjust them to a certain point.
Some I like from the past couple weeks.
[IMG]http://i32.tinypic.com/1oaonn.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i31.tinypic.com/wungvc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i30.tinypic.com/t6z9rr.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i29.tinypic.com/25q62vn.jpg[/IMG]
I really like that 3rd shot.
All of those were shot with my 10-20mm. At 20mm, it vignettes perfectly for my tastes.
It hungers for the life-blood.
[media]http://filesmelt.com/downloader/Daemon_photoshop.png[/media]
Media'd for size.
Did some traces.
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/e1X.png[/img]
Original:
[url=http://imgkk.com/c/rbf.jpg][img]http://imgkk.com/t/rbf.jpg[/img][/url]
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/7qf.png[/img]
Original:
[url=http://imgkk.com/c/gdr.jpg][img]http://imgkk.com/t/gdr.jpg[/img][/url]
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/86Y.png[/img]
Original:
[url=http://imgkk.com/c/cQ1.png][img]http://imgkk.com/t/cQ1.png[/img][/url]
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/ZbV.png[/img]
Original:
[url=http://imgkk.com/c/Fjs.jpg][img]http://imgkk.com/t/Fjs.jpg[/img][/url]
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/01x.png[/img]
Original:
[url=http://imgkk.com/c/Ziv.png][img]http://imgkk.com/t/Ziv.png[/img][/url]
Photo reference used. I have yet to have a person and an hour or two in which to sketch the person, so I'm using photos at the moment.
Don't see anything.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
