• Duke Nukem IGN Video Preview
    99 replies, posted
Oh my god. This is fucking retarded, is finishing a 14 year old game in the Era of Call of Duty and Halo a good idea. Fuck off. Advancements such as Iron Sights?
lol he's calling set pieces an innovation Call of Duty's set pieces look pathetic compared to DNF's, not to mention set-pieces aren't even a recent innovation, or even an innovation at all. Call of duty's ultra-scripted approach is terrible, the reasons Crysis is so replayable is that it balances awesome set pieces and freeform action really well, while CoD is fun for one playthrough and that's it.
Yes i want ironsight for my minigun
I wonder if this "editor" will review this game when it is released and how he'll butcher the english language this time.
I just want to kick some ass
Yes Yes, I want to touch it [editline]11th February 2011[/editline] And why would I wan't ironsights for my double rocketlauncher?
IGNorant. seriously duke nukem doesnt carefully take aim with ironsights, he just sprays around like an badass and hits.
"throwback shooter that feels very much like 1998" ... Duh?
A lot of people seem to forget what the Duke Nukem games are about.
[QUOTE=IDTL;27990897]A lot of people seem to forget what the Duke Nukem games are about.[/QUOTE] No, just him.
It really didn't seem like he was criticizing it. More or less just saying its duke nukem and not CoD.
IGN, wannabee gamers...
[QUOTE=Matrix374;27989344][quote=IGN]Gearbox stubbornly resist to use new innovations such as ironsights[/quote][/QUOTE] However, using the new functionality of working vibrators, the gameplay experience is enriched in a way that is absolutely necessary to enjoy the game to its fullest.
"Sometimes you just want to blow shit up and see some titties." [url]http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2011/02/hand-on-duke-nukem-forever.ars[/url]
Did halo need ironsight? No and Its still funnier then anything the cod series made.
[QUOTE=clanratc;27989747]No it's an advancement. It lets devs always know how much health the player will have at the start of an encounter, therefor can design them better. It also doesn't make you have to restart a level because some mistake that made you lose a bunch of health in the middle of a fight. The downside to regenerating health is that it removes a lot of the exploration you had to do in earlier games, good designers will add other things you can find by exploring though.[/QUOTE] i think it should be an option to have regenerating health or a number
That would mean they would have to design gameplay for both though. [editline]11th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Derkaderk;27988680]Haha so it's like a mindless killing game with humour thrown in[/QUOTE] So its like cod except the humor doesnt come from listenning to a 12 yar old call you a faggot. [editline]11th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Pteradactyl;27989091]What's wrong with ironsights? You always bitch about autoaim and ironsights are more accurate than just firing from the hip.[/QUOTE] Shooting from the hip I think its funner. It allows you to run and gun more.
Just read, the games length should be about 16-18 hours long.
I hate IGN as much as the next guy, but he wasn't bashing Duke for not having the same shit as CoD and Halo, he was praising it.
[QUOTE=Fkpuz Version 1;27993179]I hate IGN as much as the next guy, but he wasn't bashing Duke for not having the same shit as CoD and Halo, he was praising it.[/QUOTE] "Gearbox stubbornly resist to use new [B]innovations[/B] such as ironsights" Sounds to me like he's bashing it for being old and not bringing anything 'new' in. By new I mean shit you see in COD and Halo. Not to mention the title of the preview is questioning if it can hold up purely because it doesn't have these repeated gameplay mechanics.
Fuck ign they can hail to the king /caps
[QUOTE=spekter;27993282] Sounds to me like he's bashing it for being old and not bringing anything 'new' in. By new I mean shit you see in Halo..[/QUOTE] Personally I dont think any of the recent halos brought anything "new" the first and 2nd one did but the others were just the same mechanics of the first but used differently.
[QUOTE=DinoJesus;27993025]Just read, the games length should be about 16-18 hours long.[/QUOTE] Too long.
I think thats a good length. Game campaigns seem to be getting shorter and I would like a nice long campaign to get my moneys worth.
Long live king kotick guys
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;27993360]Personally I dont think any of the recent halos brought anything "new" the first and 2nd one did but the others were just the same mechanics of the first but used differently.[/QUOTE] Reach and Halo 1 were the best of the series tbh
This, BF3, LA Noire, Forza 4, Crysis 2. I'ma be poor after this year
no really the game doesn't look as good as it should be, seriously not really into duke nukem :colbert:
No huge set pieces? [img]http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/114/1148579/duke-nukem-forever-20110209002746272_640w.jpg[/img] What the fuck are they talking about?
[QUOTE=Arvuti;27990822]IGNorant. seriously duke nukem doesnt carefully take aim with ironsights, he just sprays around like an badass and hits.[/QUOTE] So basically he is just like Arnold Schwarzenegger in Commando?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.