[QUOTE=bepassley;42688173]yeah what i took away from all the focus on professor x in the trailer was "this movie is going to be about wolverine"[/QUOTE]
it's bryan singer, what else did you expect?
[QUOTE=bepassley;42688173]yeah what i took away from all the focus on professor x in the trailer was "this movie is going to be about wolverine"[/QUOTE]
I think it's more of, "Hey, it's Wolverine come to save the day again!" Professor X's character might be the focus of the movie, but it's supposed to be the X-Men coming to save the day. Not just Hugh Jackman.
To be fair, Wolverine was one of the main characters of the DOFP comic. From the looks of the trailer, there's a lot of development with the other characters with no Wolverine in sight. He's just had his second solo film. Singer isn't that stupid.
A really cool new viral campaign was launched, it reveals some things about what this film is
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByCY2UYLHG8[/media]
And a really interesting read, but yes, spoilers: [url]http://www.thebentbullet.com/#!/full-article[/url]
Where is cable, isn't he one of the stars of days of future past?
[QUOTE=david4leet;42994618]Where is cable, isn't he one of the stars of days of future past?[/QUOTE]
No?
The character didnt exist when the story was written, and if you're thinking of the other time traveling dude, he's black, and named Bishop, and he's in this movie.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;42994974]No?
The character didnt exist when the story was written, and if you're thinking of the other time traveling dude, he's black, and named Bishop, and he's in this movie.[/QUOTE]I know who bishop is and that was my fault, I was thinking of something else.
I wish we had gotten an r-rated old man logan film instead of this.
[QUOTE=HandsomeFrog;43015365]I wish we had gotten an r-rated old man logan film instead of this.[/QUOTE]
...Whats stopping both from existing?
[editline]29th November 2013[/editline]
Well, whats stopping both from existing besides everything involving the licensing between marvels movie characters.
[QUOTE=HandsomeFrog;43015365]I wish we had gotten an r-rated old man logan film instead of this.[/QUOTE]
Disney isn't going to allow an R-rated property out of marvel that's already existed at a different rating. Joe Quesada stated this flatly two years ago.
Never gonna happen to an existing property, and FOX still has to answer to Disney on character usage whether they own the rights or not.
[QUOTE=27X;43019704]Disney isn't going to allow an R-rated property out of marvel that's already existed at a different rating.[/QUOTE]
correct me if i'm wrong (and dumb me if i'm stating the obvious), but that's because of the marketing, right? if they had marketed, say, the iron man movie as a more violent film meant for adults, they wouldn't have a problem in making a series of r-rated IM movies, but since his movies have all had a more family-oriented target audience, they wouldn't want to lose the audience like that
Marketing is a partial answer, the rest of the answer is disney has been slowly moving towards a general PG-13 happenstance for Marvel's properties as a whole since the disney acquisition. MAX has been dropped with no reprints, a couple of mature storylines have been retooled or dropped completely, and the general level of violence and sex in the main line books is a lot closer to the late 70s and 80s, aka more things are implied than shown generally speaking or people are killed in completely unrealistic ways by powers/traps/etc.
If the first Wolverine/ X-Men had been an R, the trend would be set, but it's pretty obvious for marketing purposes that wasn't going to happen.
I swear to god if the next Punisher movie is PG-13...
[QUOTE=AaronM202;43042356]I swear to god if the next Punisher movie is PG-13...[/QUOTE]
Don't worry, there won't be another Punisher movie.
[QUOTE=Zuimzado;43042386]Don't worry, there won't be another Punisher movie.[/QUOTE]
TV series?
[QUOTE=AaronM202;43042417]TV series?[/QUOTE]
That's a whole different conversation.
anything related to the Punisher should have Robocop levels of violence
[QUOTE=Joazzz;43044034]anything related to the Punisher should have Robocop levels of violence[/QUOTE]
As bad as most people think Warzone was, i still loved it because of the over-the-top violence.
A dude parkours, gets hit by a missile, and fucking disappears.
[editline]2nd December 2013[/editline]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF28ceFJJ3A[/media]
[QUOTE=AaronM202;43044042]As bad as most people think Warzone was, i still loved it because of the over-the-top violence.
A dude parkours, gets hit by a missile, and fucking disappears.
[editline]2nd December 2013[/editline]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF28ceFJJ3A[/media][/QUOTE]
that's schumacher levels of camp right there
Looks like the sequel, X-Men: Apocalypse is coming May 27, 2016
kjsdgnkjfxbgnjkxv omfg I always wanted to see Apocalypse in a live action movie
i wonder who will be the main villain of that movie, surely it will be a real surprise
Didn't Apocalypse have a time travel machine or something? Makes a lot of sense to have a movie focused on him after Days of the Future Past
Oh holy shit.
Apocalypse?
Shits gonna go down.
[sp]Please be an adaption of Age Of Apocalypse.[/sp]
[editline]5th December 2013[/editline]
I got to say, though, im honestly surprised this movie series was never rebooted, most have.
I mean shit, X-Men The Last Stand and X-Men Origins Wolverine both happened.
lol a scene getting deleted has just resulted in Rogue being totally cut from the film, since it was the only scene she appeared in
[url]http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=112762[/url]
[QUOTE=postal;43257075]lol a scene getting deleted has just resulted in Rogue being totally cut from the film, since it was the only scene she appeared in
[url]http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=112762[/url][/QUOTE]
Meh, her character wasn't all that relevant after the first movie.
Looks like she'll have to be Paquin her bags, and hitting the Rogue.
:suicide:
[QUOTE=postal;43257075]lol a scene getting deleted has just resulted in Rogue being totally cut from the film, since it was the only scene she appeared in
[url]http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=112762[/url][/QUOTE]
why would she even be in the film?
- she wasn't born in the 70s
- she cured herself in X3 (though we know the cure is not permanent)
- she set out to have a normal life with bobby but we know how human/mutant relationships work out
waste of a great character
[QUOTE=Pops;43258142]why would she even be in the film?
- she wasn't born in the 70s
- she cured herself in X3 (though we know the cure is not permanent)
- she set out to have a normal life with bobby but we know how human/mutant relationships work out
waste of a great character[/QUOTE]
You're kind of forgetting the whole "Sentinel induced apocalyptic nuclear war" aspect that would pretty much negate the last two reasons.
[QUOTE=Pops;43258142]why would she even be in the film?
- she wasn't born in the 70s
- she cured herself in X3 (though we know the cure is not permanent)
- she set out to have a normal life with bobby but we know how human/mutant relationships work out
waste of a great character[/QUOTE]
I liked the actor but damn did they gimp her character. Like she literally did nothing in all 3 films.
The most Rogue did in the movies was find a way to get Wolverine on the team and have him dick around a bit so he'd stay.
[editline]21st December 2013[/editline]
And also suddenly fly a jet to the team even though they could've easily walked to it.
[editline]21st December 2013[/editline]
Rogue was a living plot device, really.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
