[QUOTE=Kamern;25487712]Regardless a theory is still a theory.
Why are you trying to glorify it? It's not a fact until it has been proven.[/QUOTE]
Universal [b]theory[/b] of gravitation.
You've got no idea what you're on about.
[QUOTE=Tea;25487615]go get laid op[/QUOTE]
whoa shit man, I wanted to say that
[QUOTE=Kamern;25487782]You sure about that?
I don't think you used much intelligence on that one.
Refer to string theory.[/QUOTE]
I was obviously referring to the intelligence theories.
[editline]18th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=PoloXGS;25487715]Oh [i]dear god[/i]. I hate people who believe intelligence is measured purely by IQ. No, just no. Intelligence believe it or not is an umbrella term, it's not just the basic logical aspects that determine intelligence.
Basically: Durrrrrrrrrrrrrrr[/QUOTE]
Go make a more detailed theory than the current one please.
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;25487794]Universal [b]theory[/b] of gravitation.
You've got no idea what you're on about.[/QUOTE]
[quote]a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses"; "true in fact and theory"[/quote]
Things which work in theory do not necessarily work in practice. Theories can be flawed, if a theory is flawed or is incomplete it is not fact.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487777]The most accurate and detailed intelligence theory out there.[/QUOTE]
Well you must have such a high IQ to think that Theory should be trusted 100%
my iq is 91
[QUOTE=Coffee;25487816]Well you must have such a high IQ to think that Theory should be trusted 100%[/QUOTE]
It's the most accurate and detailed one out there. All of the people who tried to refute it or make a better one failed.
[QUOTE=Occlusion;25487749]I've got a 175 IQ, but you dont see me waving my dick around do you.[/QUOTE]
You're not telling the truth. 175 is up there with the greatest minds of history. You're not 10 years ahead of your peers are you? Retake it with a professional.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487797]I was obviously referring to the intelligence theories.
[editline]18th October 2010[/editline]
Go make a more detailed theory than the current one please.[/QUOTE]
Just because we say the theory is not 100% correct, doesn't mean we can write a better theory
It's like a person saying 'this game is shit' and you replying 'well why don't you make a better one then'
[QUOTE=BrQ;25487839]Just because we say the theory is not 100% correct, doesn't mean we can write a better theory
It's like a person saying 'this game is shit' and you replying 'well why don't you make a better one then'[/QUOTE]
It's the most correct possibility available to us at the moment, just like the theory of gravity.
Now, you generally don't say that the last one is bullshit without providing a new and more detailed theory, do you?
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487797]
Go make a more detailed theory than the current one please.[/QUOTE]
Ad hominem. You're attacking him because he has not made a theory.
[QUOTE=blacksam;25487871]Ad hominem. You're attacking him because he has not made a theory.[/QUOTE]
Not really, he's just acting like one of those people who blindly defend an idea.
"Here look at this awesome video!"
"It's shit"
"You can't make a better one :(!"
[QUOTE=Kamern;25487896]Not really, he's just acting like one of those people who blindly defend an idea.
"Here look at this awesome video!"
"It's shit"
"You can't make a better one :(!"[/QUOTE]
Have a heart for being a gentleman.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487832]It's the most accurate and detailed one out there. All of the people who tried to refute it or make a better one failed.[/QUOTE]
So are you trying to say you copy-pasted bits of this from some other website(s)?
[QUOTE=Kamern;25487896]Not really, he's just acting like one of those people who blindly defend an idea.
"Here look at this awesome video!"
"It's shit"
"You can't make a better one :(!"[/QUOTE]
"Hey look, the theory of gravity is the best and most detailed theory of gravity available to mankind."
"No, ur wrong cause well we walk around and its like flat surface everywjhere not round wtf r u talking about dumbass..."
[QUOTE=Kamern;25487896]Not really, he's just acting like one of those people who blindly defend an idea.
"Here look at this awesome video!"
"It's shit"
"You can't make a better one :(!"[/QUOTE]
yeah, it's basically what I said
[QUOTE=Kamern;25487896]Not really, he's just acting like one of those people who blindly defend an idea.
"Here look at this awesome video!"
"It's shit"
"You can't make a better one :(!"[/QUOTE]
It's called being a critic, you don't have to beat the producer, just point out the flaws.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487944]"Hey look, the theory of gravity is the best and most detailed theory of gravity available to mankind."
"No, ur wrong cause well we walk around and its like flat surface everywjhere not round wtf r u talking about dumbass..."[/QUOTE]
very related and makes a lot of sense
You can NOT contradict the current theory of intelligence UNLESS you develop a more detailed and accurate one, AND refute the old one.
ITT: Low-IQ people not listening to reason
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487944]"Hey look, the theory of gravity is the best and most detailed theory of gravity available to mankind."
"No, ur wrong cause well we walk around and its like flat surface everywjhere not round wtf r u talking about dumbass..."[/QUOTE]
Yeah sure you say it is the best available. What are the applications though?
[QUOTE=Coffee;25487951]It's called being a critic, you don't have to beat the producer, just point out the flaws.[/QUOTE]
Exactly.
[QUOTE=blacksam;25487980]Yeah sure you say it is the best available. What are the applications though?[/QUOTE]
Space-related sciences mainly.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487978]You can NOT contradict the current theory of intelligence UNLESS you develop a more detailed and accurate one, AND refute the old one.
ITT: Low-IQ people not listening to reason[/QUOTE]
“Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used”
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487978]ITT: Low-IQ people not listening to reason[/QUOTE]
ITT: OP has a superiority complex.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487978]You can NOT contradict the current theory of intelligence UNLESS you develop a more detailed and accurate one, AND refute the old one.
ITT: Low-IQ people not listening to reason[/QUOTE]
To be honest, if you have a high IQ I'd be afraid to think what people smarter than you act like.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487797]Go make a more detailed theory than the current one please.[/QUOTE]
I don't have to. It's been done. Do more research please.
In other words, and I see this all the time; People only tend to accept the aspects that fits their ideals, they never dare consider the facts that disagree with their current theory in fear they might be wrong. That's not a theory, that's just confirmation bias.
[QUOTE=JDK721v5;25488008]ITT: OP has a superiority complex.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I have a superiority complex over low-IQ people.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487978]You can NOT contradict the current theory of intelligence UNLESS you develop a more detailed and accurate one, AND refute the old one.
ITT: Low-IQ people not listening to reason[/QUOTE]
Lol, this has to be a troll thread.
Look, I'm not going to post my IQ but I'm smarter than you, you're acting like an ass.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25488033]Yeah, I have a superiority complex over low-IQ people.[/QUOTE]
Democrat?
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25488033]Yeah, I have a superiority complex over low-IQ people.[/QUOTE]
This thread is utter shit.
Look at the quality of that post, I think you're trolling.
[QUOTE=Glorious leader;25487978]You can NOT contradict the current theory of intelligence UNLESS you develop a more detailed and accurate one, AND refute the old one.
ITT: Low-IQ people not listening to reason[/QUOTE]
I can easily say the theory is bullshit without creating a new one
As said before, by pointing out flaws in the theory.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.