I was gonna point out this has to be the first time I've seen brentalfloss comics without dick jokes as the punchline, but I went back and found he even contemplates his ability to 'do the brentalfloss thing forever', after failing to do a good dick joke on page 3
[QUOTE=pvt.jenkins;35355531]Tom Preston.[/QUOTE]
To his defense, he isn't the one who wrote that shit.
Just blame him for the mediocre art (but slightly better than his usual works)
[editline]30th March 2012[/editline]
Also he confirmed somewhere that he does his SYAC/political comics now for the simple purpose of pissing off people.
lol whats his next excuse for being terrible gonna be.
Am I the only sane person in this thread?
I am seriously reconsidering my thoughts, but I don't think I've said anything wrong : these people need help, they are trying to make things such as bestiality look normal and make people who don't think it's normal look intolerent.
I don't know at which point having sex with animals has become acceptable. Explain this to me.
[url]http://comments.deviantart.com/1/292851302/2477384296[/url] where he said he does his comics "to provoke" people
[url]http://comments.deviantart.com/1/292851302/2477787267[/url] haha just kill yourself
[url]http://comments.deviantart.com/1/292851302/2477445042[/url] more stupidity
[url]http://comments.deviantart.com/1/292851302/2477332530[/url] more excuses
[QUOTE=Detlef;35355761]lol whats his next excuse for being terrible gonna be.[/QUOTE]
[I]"My mummy dropped me too hard please stop making ctiricsms!"[/I]
It's disgusting how he only does comics for the page views now, and not for the sake of making a good comic.
It really shows in the quality.
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35355792]Am I the only sane person in this thread?
I am seriously reconsidering my thoughts, but I don't think I've said anything wrong : these people need help, they are trying to make things such as bestiality look normal and make people who don't think it's normal look intolerent.
I don't know at which point having sex with animals has become acceptable. Explain this to me.[/QUOTE]
When fucked up people are together in a room without supervision, they will reassure each other that the fucked up things they're into are normal. If one of them starts questioning the sick fuckery, the others will reassure him that it's totally normal. If they go unchallenged for a long time it just gets worse, and eventually leads to the cesspool we call DeviantArt.
[QUOTE=JustGman;35355996]When fucked up people are together in a room without supervision, they will reassure each other that the fucked up things they're into are normal. If one of them starts questioning the sick fuckery, the others will reassure him that it's totally normal. If they go unchallenged for a long time it just gets worse, and eventually leads to the cesspool we call DeviantArt.[/QUOTE]
You do realise that every single brain on this planet is not supposed to function the exact same way as each other, and that the differences between what we like and what we don't like is what makes us human, right?
To say "People different them me are weird!" is to put yourself in the place of the prime example of a human being.
Which no one can acclaim to.
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35355792]Am I the only sane person in this thread?
I am seriously reconsidering my thoughts, but I don't think I've said anything wrong : these people need help, they are trying to make things such as bestiality look normal and make people who don't think it's normal look intolerent.
I don't know at which point having sex with animals has become acceptable. Explain this to me.[/QUOTE]
IT'S CARTOONS. It's drawings. It's fiction.
Drawings never hurt anyone. If they get off to beastality in drawn form then that fucking doesn't matter to me. It shouldn't matter to you. Animals doesn't even know.
If it can help avoid them actually going out and fuck an animal that's even better. If it makes them fuck animals less, then that's also good.
It also doesn't actually mean that they are into animals at all. They are into the cartoon drawings of animals. A pony looks very different from a My Little Pony. If you compare the two anyone would agree that the pony looks hideous in comparision, well there is probably some that would disagree, but overall people would agree.
I can get turned on by drawn dicks, but I can get nauseous when I see a dick during the straightest porn.
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35355792]Am I the only sane person in this thread?
I am seriously reconsidering my thoughts, but I don't think I've said anything wrong : these people need help, they are trying to make things such as bestiality look normal and make people who don't think it's normal look intolerent.
I don't know at which point having sex with animals has become acceptable. Explain this to me.[/QUOTE]
Jerking off to furry porn =/= Being a zoophile
[QUOTE=Chaplin;35356456]Jerking off to furry porn =/= Being a zoophile[/QUOTE]
Anthropomorphic animals are animals too. Think gorilla.
Also, I just realised my first post on this page was under daijutsu's post, which implies I am replying to him. I am actually not, as I didn't even see his post by the time I posted mine.
I'm actually very happy for his friend that he managed to make a quick buck off people's fetishes.
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35356542]Anthropomorphic animals are animals too. Think gorilla.[/QUOTE]
Okay, so you are not very intelligent.
Anthropomorphic animals are not animals at all because animals can not be anthropomorphic.
Only humans can make cartoon characters into anthropomorphic creatures or dress up as animals causing the character they roleplay as to be a anthropomorphic creature.
It has nothing to do with actual animals in any way or form. It's purely fiction.
[QUOTE=sirdownloadsalot;35356332]You do realise that every single brain on this planet is not supposed to function the exact same way as each other, and that the differences between what we like and what we don't like is what makes us human, right?
To say "People different them me are weird!" is to put yourself in the place of the prime example of a human being.
Which no one can acclaim to.[/QUOTE]
Excuse me for being a part of the mainstream system that doesn't fap to anthros, maaaaaan.
How about we all agree that Scarbix is fucking stupid and get back onto the original idea of the thread?
[IMG]http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/090/3/2/karaline_reef_dotd_by_pinkiedot101-d4ui1g0.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2012/090/4/b/derwent_digital_reference_by_creative_owl-d4ui1fy.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/090/4/f/julia_gift_art_by_furryfailure-d4ui1gr.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35356587]Excuse me for being a part of the mainstream system that doesn't fap to anthros, maaaaaan.[/QUOTE]
All I'm saying is that I doubt anyone goes out and rapes a cat just because they like furry porn.
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35355792]Am I the only sane person in this thread?
I am seriously reconsidering my thoughts, but I don't think I've said anything wrong : these people need help, they are trying to make things such as bestiality look normal and make people who don't think it's normal look intolerent.
I don't know at which point having sex with animals has become acceptable. Explain this to me.[/QUOTE]
Are you seriously going down the 'furry = zoophile' road? Just stop it now before we get hopelessly derailed again.
[QUOTE=dgg;35356583]Okay, so you are not very intelligent.
Anthropomorphic animals are not animals at all because animals can not be anthropomorphic.
Only humans can make cartoon characters into anthropomorphic creatures or dress up as animals causing the character they roleplay as to be a anthropomorphic creature.
It has nothing to do with actual animals in any way or form. It's purely fiction.[/QUOTE]
ITT: gorillas are fiction.
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35356542]Anthropomorphic animals are animals too. Think gorilla.[/QUOTE]
Except the fact that anthropomorphic animals portrayed in furry porn or clean art are in most cases as intelligent as humans and able to give informed consent
[QUOTE=Thunderbolt;35356631]Except the fact that anthropomorphic animals portrayed in furry porn or clean art are in most cases as intelligent as humans and able to give informed consent[/QUOTE]
And yet the denomination is still : anthropomorphic ANIMALS.
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35356626]ITT: gorillas are fiction.[/QUOTE]
Definition of anthro-morphic
Anthro, to be human in characteristic.
Morphic, to be altered or changed into.
Anthromorphic to be altered to have more human like characteristics.
Hence, a ape is not altered directly to be "anthro" hence not qualified for the term morphic.
Now an ape wearing glases, all bets are off.
Let's look at the opposite though,
[img]http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs15/f/2006/364/f/c/ape_tf_by_Taoming.jpg[/img]
This is just weird.
Ps, Stop right there criminal scum, Stop derailing the thread!
Content, or gtFo
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35356680]And yet the denomination is still : anthropomorphic ANIMALS.[/QUOTE]
That's just because their [I]apperance[/I] is based on real animals
Would it be okay for you if they were completely made-up creatures?
Just because someone finds furries attractive doesn't mean they would go and fuck a dog, because oh I don't know, the dog CAN'T EVEN TALK AND LOOKS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT?
- Ponies posted because Poines
- Wasted Talent Arguments
- Defining Furry
what the fuck are you guys doing for fuck sake
[t]http://th05.deviantart.net/fs71/PRE/i/2012/090/5/6/my_sonic_shirt_by_animecat33-d4uhmhh.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=bravojr;35356695]Definition of anthro-morphic
Anthro, to be human in characteristic.
Morphic, to be altered or changed into.
Anthromorphic to be altered to have more human like characteristics.
Hence, a ape is not altered directly to be "anthro" hence not qualified for the term morphic.
Now an ape wearing glases, all bets are off.[/QUOTE]
Still doesn't change the fact that the existence of gorillas make it clear human-shaped animals could exist. Now just wait for a human-shaped wolf, put some glasses on him, then by deviantart's standards it's perfectly okay for you to have sex with it.
Now, I'll leave it at that because new page.
Why don't you make a new thread if you want to argue instead of derailing this one?
Content:
[IMG]http://th01.deviantart.net/fs71/PRE/i/2012/090/4/f/young_justice_oc__too_old__sketch_by_yjfan12-d4ui2id.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2012/090/1/0/moonseye_is_not_a_pokemon__by_norsu2-d4ui2i9.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2012/090/c/7/swords_gardiandragon_by_greaykey-d4ui2l5.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2012/090/9/8/cave_mitchell_and_sarah_by_tigerbreath13-d4ui32y.png[/IMG]
[editline]30th March 2012[/editline]
[IMG]http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/090/f/8/why_you_should_not_mess_with_alice_liddel__by_madnessmiku-d4ui35b.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35356626]ITT: gorillas are fiction.[/QUOTE]
ITT: Stupid derails
[QUOTE=Quinnjdq;35356807][IMG]http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/090/f/8/why_you_should_not_mess_with_alice_liddel__by_madnessmiku-d4ui35b.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Did someone say alice?
[IMG]http://home.sandiego.edu/~dhoffoss/computercamp/alice.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Sherd Red;35356816]ITT: Stupid derails[/QUOTE]
Tell me of one single page in this thread that's not been derailed.
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35356626]ITT: gorillas are fiction.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Scarabix;35356761]Still doesn't change the fact that the existence of gorillas make it clear human-shaped animals could exist. Now just wait for a human-shaped wolf, put some glasses on him, then by deviantart's standards it's perfectly okay for you to have sex with it.
Now, I'll leave it at that because new page.[/QUOTE]
Gorillas aren't anthropomorphic.
They're animals that we've most likely evolved from, but they do not act like humans or have human characteristics.
Being human-shaped is not what anthropomorphic is. Acting like a human and having a humanoid shape is what being anthropomorphic is. It's only possible through fiction.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
