[QUOTE=Fekel Die Juden;16350834]She does meth like a can of hurricanes.[/QUOTE]
...what?
[QUOTE=Cluckyx;16351005]You couldn't make this shit up could you? Fuuuuuuuuuck :buddy:[/QUOTE]
M. Night shamalamalamalam could.
[QUOTE=Cluckyx;16351005]You couldn't make this shit up could you? Fuuuuuuuuuck :buddy:[/QUOTE]
Ya, I don't have proof this ever happened, so you'll just have to believe me. I would give you all a picture or something but I don't have any.
Woman did the right thing confessing :patriot:
[QUOTE=GayPancake;16351252]Ya, I don't have proof this ever happened, so you'll just have to believe me. I would give you all a picture or something but I don't have any.[/QUOTE]
No no no... it's a saying. As in it's too fucked up to be made up.
That's a story for the grand children.
This is awesome!
Forget the meth-head the lawyer should be disbarred, he can't tell anyone anything that will put his client in trouble.
[QUOTE=Hdeuce;16351482]Forget the meth-head the lawyer should be disbarred, he can't tell anyone anything that will put his client in trouble.[/QUOTE]
I was under the impression that this sort of confidentiality only applied to the defendant and his lawyer, not the prosecutor and his lawyer. For example if the prosecution finds out that the police purposefully made up evidence in an attempt to frame the defendant, I would say that lawyer-client (lawyer-state) confidentiality doesn't quite apply in that situation.
Lawyers call the police when their clients do something illegal?
[QUOTE=Uberslug;16351569]Lawyers call the police when their clients do something illegal?[/QUOTE]
It doesn't matter to them, they just want money really.
[QUOTE=ghuh;16351593]It doesn't matter to them, they just want money really.[/QUOTE]
This man speaks the truth. Money is everything, remember?
Amazing how some funny bloke just went through and rated everyone dumb 'till post #38.
[QUOTE=Uberslug;16351569]Lawyers call the police when their clients do something illegal?[/QUOTE]
he probably called the police to straighten out the matter and had to mention that his client was on meth, so the police then went after her
Write a short story about this, and sell it to schools concerned about drug and sexual assault.
[I]Facepunch wins the day![/I]
[img]http://img523.imageshack.us/img523/7615/zing5oa2wz8.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=BldrGyMnGy;16352229]Write a short story about this, and sell it to schools concerned about drug and sexual assault.[/QUOTE]
And then make a thread about it? :v:
I guess it serves her right.
This is yet more evidence for Karmas existence.
Karma strikes back, again.
her lawyer is kind of a dick
The plot thickens.
[QUOTE=DualReaver;16356390]her lawyer is kind of a duck[/QUOTE]
Fixed.
[QUOTE=Shogoll;16351567]I was under the impression that this sort of confidentiality only applied to the defendant and his lawyer, not the prosecutor and his lawyer. For example if the prosecution finds out that the police purposefully made up evidence in an attempt to frame the defendant, I would say that lawyer-client (lawyer-state) confidentiality doesn't quite apply in that situation.[/QUOTE]
Well, no. If the prosecutor finds out the police planted evidence they are bound to inform the court of evidence tampering. But it seems to me that in the op , the lawyer who informed the police of what happened had to be the defense attorney, in which case the fact that the client was on meth-amphetamines should have never come to light........ and the prosecutor is the lawyer. District Atty. and Asst. District Atty. act as the prosecutors on criminal cases, and actually are held to a higher ethical standard than the Defense Atty.
I'm pretty sure it's illegal for the lawyer [I]not [/I]to tell the police.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
