soldiers blow up tanker with nades - General

The real question isn't how much the shell cost. It's how much the tanker was worth, including the fuel. Consider how much money it would have saved the US if they'd taken that fuel and loaded it into their vehicles. Doesn't seem so smart now does it.

That video was awesome. Then I clicked around and ended up here. [url]http://www.break.com/index/two-girls-one-cyst.html[/url] God I regret that.

[QUOTE=Number-41;21326785]I think YOU are the one acting like a tough guy...[/QUOTE] LOL, How?

[QUOTE=MiKeV;21325152]Oooooo tough guy. The grip on the 203 attachment can be called a shell because of the way it's rigged. So I misunderstood him, OMG OH NO. Put your dick back in your pants.[/QUOTE] Stop acting like a dick and use your head. What do you think he was more likely referring to when he said a $10 shell? [editline]05:41PM[/editline] [QUOTE=SatansSin;21326941]I think you idiots forgot that MikeV actually served. Seriously, shut up.[/QUOTE] For someone I would hold deep respect for, he's acting pretty immature.

[QUOTE=SatansSin;21326941]I think you idiots forgot that MikeV actually served. Seriously, shut up.[/QUOTE] I thank him for serving but that doesn't void ignorance. Acting tough over the internet is useless, if you're going to make a wise crack at lease make it right. Also, resorting to childish attacks make you look immature. [QUOTE=MiKeV;21318971] [QUOTE=Helldoran] Oh yeah, heaven forbid he used a 10 dollar M203 shell to create a wicked sick explosion [/QUOTE] 10 dollars? lol? It's wwwaaaaaaaaaay more than that. We have new sights on those that are really expensive. And it's not a "contraption", it's an M203 lol. I'm carrying one on post tonight as a matter of fact. Unless you fire it at something like that, a tanker, it's boring as fuck to fire because there's only a thump sound, a really small flash, and smoke :/[/QUOTE] Obviously if you read Helldoran's post you will understand that he is clearly talking about the shell that was fired from the M203 launcher. [QUOTE=MurphyS;21327327]The real question isn't how much the shell cost. It's how much the tanker was worth, including the fuel. Consider how much money it would have saved the US if they'd taken that fuel and loaded it into their vehicles. Doesn't seem so smart now does it.[/QUOTE] Actually I believe that the soldiers were being safe by blowing it up. During patrols they never know if something like that 'accidental' tanker wreck is actually accidental or some insurgents rigged it to be used as a weapon. It's always safer to destroy something than to end up messing with it and finding out some terrorist is behind a building with a detonator.

[QUOTE=SirKillsAlot;21336743]Stop acting like a dick and use your head. What do you think he was more likely referring to when he said a $10 shell?[/QUOTE] Yeah, I'm a dick for misunderstanding him. Alot of people are ignorant of things in the military. Calm the fuck down. [QUOTE=reedbo;21336855]I thank him for serving but that doesn't void ignorance. Acting tough over the internet is useless, if you're going to make a wise crack at lease make it right. Also, resorting to childish attacks make you look immature. [/QUOTE] lol, Misunderstanding is not "ignorance". How was I acting tough? Please tell me. And I wasn't making a wise crack. I'm sorry that my knowledge of the military offends you.

[QUOTE=MiKeV;21336874]Yeah, I'm a dick for misunderstanding him. Alot of people are ignorant of things in the military. Calm the fuck down.[/QUOTE] Ahh shit sorry I forgot... [img]http://farm1.static.flickr.com/25/53461796_56889939b8.jpg[/img] *ROCK OR SOMETHING*

Yeah because I'm the one that made MRE heaters. And like it has anything to do with my post, lol.