• Democrat Anti-Gillespie Ad
    47 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Tudd;52846594]Please describe in your own words what that truck was going to do with the children at the dead-end. Because they totally weren't trying to invoke Charlottesville-vibes in an ad invoking Charlotteville-vibes of people getting ran over. Right? I know you have a tendency to say out of touch beliefs, but hopefully you aren't going to seriously tell me the guy wanted to just shout at the kids or something.[/QUOTE] Given Gillespie's rhetoric that I've seen probably deport them.
[QUOTE=Lambeth;52846653]Given Gillespie's rhetoric that I've seen probably deport them.[/QUOTE] "Probably" You sure about that? Or do you think you might be a bit disingenuous right now? Are you go going to tell me next that including the Charlottesville bit was just coincidental now to?
[QUOTE=Tudd;52843791]If an ad by the republicans came out that showed Democrats to be wanton murderers and suggest they are supporters of murderers, I would be saying the exact same thing. Wouldnt you?[/QUOTE] Republicans are saying they would have gone further than gianforte on beating that reporter up for asking questions Get real
[QUOTE=Tudd;52846719]"Probably" You sure about that? Or do you think you might be a bit disingenuous right now? Are you go going to tell me next that including the Charlottesville bit was just coincidental now to?[/QUOTE] I say probably because I can't get inside the mind of the person who wrote/directed/produced that ad.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;52846729]Republicans are saying they would have gone further than gianforte on beating that reporter up for asking questions Get real[/QUOTE] And that is terrible. Do you think I support that? [editline]2nd November 2017[/editline] [QUOTE=Lambeth;52846776]I say probably because I can't get inside the mind of the person who wrote/directed/produced that ad.[/QUOTE] Really strange how you have a hard time getting inside the mind of this ad, but when it comes to opposition stories you seem to always have a clear insight on why, how, and who did what things and what their motives are a lot of the time.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52846808]Really strange how you have a hard time getting inside the mind of this ad, but when it comes to opposition stories you seem to always have a clear insight on why, how, and who did what things and what their motives are a lot of the time.[/QUOTE] I'm just making educated guesses my dude, sorry you don't like mine.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52846808]And that is terrible. Do you think I support that?[/QUOTE] Don't ask questions like that when you know your reputation, seriously man.
[QUOTE=jimbobjoe1234;52846472]It still doesn't make it right. You should never stoop down to your opponent's level.[/QUOTE] Northam and the state Democratic Party hasn't. This was Latino Victory Fund. VA GOP and Gillespie directly have been disgusting to the hispanic community in their attacks, so again it isn't surprising that a Latino group pushed back. Nowhere am I saying it's ok, I'm commentating on the Virginia political environment.
[QUOTE=doomkiwi;52846834]Don't ask questions like that when you know your reputation, seriously man.[/QUOTE] I have never been for violence. There is no reputation on that with me.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52846894]I have never been for violence. There is no reputation on that with me.[/QUOTE] You've literally never posted in a thread about Gianforte on here. For someone that loves to rail about political violence and free speech you were conspicuously absent from all of that, even though an elected official tried to silence the press with violence. I almost posted about it when you immediately jumped into the Alexandria shooting thread soon after and started shit, but I didn't want to add more political vitriol to that situation out of respect for the injured. You're transparent as fuck mate.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52846894]I have never been for violence. There is no reputation on that with me.[/QUOTE] Would advise against supporting Trump brotato
somehow still not the most insane attack ad [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKln7salIrg[/media] id also like to point out some wild inaccuracies because the klan's truck of choice has always been the chevy silverado with the front license plate being the arctic cat logo
[QUOTE=Tudd;52846894]I have never been for violence. There is no reputation on that with me.[/QUOTE] Your absence from important threads to create threads of an "Alternate viewpoint" are easily seen through at this point contrary to all you state.
[QUOTE=1legmidget;52847407]You've literally never posted in a thread about Gianforte on here. For someone that loves to rail about political violence and free speech you were conspicuously absent from all of that, even though an elected official tried to silence the press with violence. I almost posted about it when you immediately jumped into the Alexandria shooting thread soon after and started shit, but I didn't want to add more political vitriol to that situation out of respect for the injured. You're transparent as fuck mate.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;52850240]Your absence from important threads to create threads of an "Alternate viewpoint" are easily seen through at this point contrary to all you state.[/QUOTE] I would genuinely like to hear a response to this if you believe any of the above is false. If not we'll all just happily put this to bed knowing that the record has been set straight.
[QUOTE=Michael haxz;52860025]I would genuinely like to hear a response to this if you believe any of the above is false. If not we'll all just happily put this to bed knowing that the record has been set straight.[/QUOTE] Well it's just sort of an endless game to explain posting habits. There are threads you would probably expect me to "capitalize" too that I also don't post in. Nobody seems to notice that, and there are quite a few threads that are up for cheap points/I could be a real dick in. I didn't comment initially on Gianforte cause it wasn't that big of a story quite simply. Just something I thought was a shitty thing to do and hoped the guy got what came to him. Also the Alexandria shooting was easily a bigger story and far more serious than a guy who lost his cool and body slammed a journalist. You are a loon to think my priorities are wrong for that. Either way I have never been for violence full stop. Anyone who suggests otherwise is just a fool with nothing to base that on besides an outrage to how I post.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52860082]Either way I have never been for violence full stop. Anyone who suggests otherwise is just a fool with nothing to base that on besides an outrage to how I post.[/QUOTE] Your voice says no but your voting habit and continued support of a president that essentially enables such behavior says otherwise.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52860082]Well it's just sort of an endless game to explain posting habits. There are threads you would probably expect me to "capitalize" too that I also don't post in. Nobody seems to notice that, and there are quite a few threads that are up for cheap points/I could be a real dick in. I didn't comment initially on Gianforte cause it wasn't that big of a story quite simply. Just something I thought was a shitty thing to do and hoped the guy got what came to him. Also the Alexandria shooting was easily a bigger story and far more serious than a guy who lost his cool and body slammed a journalist. You are a loon to think my priorities are wrong for that. Either way I have never been for violence full stop. Anyone who suggests otherwise is just a fool with nothing to base that on besides an outrage to how I post.[/QUOTE] If you're resorting to the shotgun method of defensive argument (throwing out 3 or more "that was different!" or "but thats not a big deal as that") then you clearly cant actually defend your statement.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52860082] Either way I have never been for violence full stop. Anyone who suggests otherwise is just a fool with nothing to base that on besides an outrage to how I post.[/QUOTE] I fully believe you when you say you aren't for violence. I haven't seen you go out of your way to endorse violence in politics or any other sphere. But you do tend to ignore violence that isn't necessarily convenient to your perspective while pushing and sensationalizing violence that is. When you do talk about it it's equivocating, or whataboutism, or, probably worse of all, characterizing it as "not that big of a story", as if Republican congressmen bodyslam reporters for daring to speak out against them all the time. I think if you just put in a little bit of effort to at least appear neutral or objective you wouldn't have this "endless game" that is essentially just people reading your posts and simply not believing you. As if you wouldn't have posted a story of a Democrat bodyslamming a reporter as soon as it appeared. [editline]6th November 2017[/editline] Going back a page for an example; [QUOTE=Tudd;52843791]If an ad by the republicans came out that showed Democrats to be wanton murderers and suggest they are supporters of murderers, I would be saying the exact same thing. Wouldnt you?[/QUOTE] Would you post about it, if people asked you to directly confront it? Maybe, like you are doing in this thread about violence in general. But would you have made a thread for it? I'm going to imagine most here would doubt it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.