This is an interesting way to look at things. Cool.
That was interesting
[QUOTE=xxncxx;23358136]Why try to learn a concept that you can't understand, when you can understand one that is incorrect, then fix it, and understand it.[/QUOTE]
Because, in this particular case, this video is so off-base that to "fix" what's wrong with it is tantamount to just teaching you the real theory anyway.
[QUOTE=noctune9;23362098]If anyone is interested in string theory they should really see Brian Greene' TED talk [url=http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/brian_greene_on_string_theory.html]here[/url].[/QUOTE]
I love TED.. Well, some of them are quite funny/interesting.
[QUOTE=DONUT KING;23357976]It couldn't since it has no concept of height. Everything in the third dimension has height, even if it's as thin as possible. We wouldn't be able to see second dimensional creatures since they have no height. Unless we look at them from the top down... Which means- wait, what?
[editline]05:34PM[/editline]
Fuck I just confused myself.[/QUOTE]
There are no two dimensional creatures in the third dimension.
[QUOTE=red_pharoah;23361778]that's the point,
also we can't look at a 2d creature except from front/back, but since it can't have systems (AKA any type of hollowness cuts it in half), practically a 2d creature doesn't exist in this reality.[/QUOTE]
It could use the same hole as both mouth and anus, much like a jellyfish does. That wouldn't cut it in half.
His fucking english FUCK
DEFTH
HIGHFT
FUCK.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
