[img]http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii315/edberggonzalez/car.jpg[/img]
god what a ricer i want to punch whoever this belongs to
I drive a 1999 Honda Civic Si so that makes me a ricer as well...
[QUOTE=edberg;21296474]god what a ricer i want to punch whoever this belongs to[/QUOTE]
agreed hondas suck
[QUOTE=Bledrix;21296809]I drive a 1999 Honda Civic Si so that makes me a ricer as well...[/QUOTE]
pics now
[QUOTE=abcpea;21297038]agreed hondas suck[/QUOTE]
Except S2000's without red lugnuts and NSX's
[QUOTE=lemon_lover;21297909]Except S2000's without red lugnuts and NSX's[/QUOTE]
red lugs are jdm tyte ok
whats facepunch's thoughts on the Lexus IS300? Although I am looking at many "economy" cars the IS300 is something I'm heavily considering. It's sexy, reliable, smooth, nimble, and RWD. But I don't like the idea of buying a ten or eight year old luxury car even if it is reliable. The gas mileage sucks and I wouldn't expect that car too have much resale value 5 years from now.
sexy interior
[img]http://www.familycar.com/RoadTests/LexusIS300/images/Dash.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.cargurus.com/images/2009/12/16/15/05/2001_lexus_is_300_std-pic-1031738336338302.jpeg[/img]
It seems nice but it seems like all the ones I see have ricer taillights installed. For once I'd like to see one without them. What started the whole "clear taillights" thing anyway?
[QUOTE=RedStar;21299575]It seems nice but it seems like all the ones I see have ricer taillights installed. For once I'd like to see one without them. What started the whole "clear taillights" thing anyway?[/QUOTE]
the above, the is300 or better known as the Toyota Altezza started the altezza craze.
[QUOTE=Ferosso;21291514]Just made my introduction post on this new Drift website I was asked to Join :dance:
[url]http://www.drifted.com/sebastian-pichard/introduction/429/#more-429[/url][/QUOTE]
Sebbe?? Skelleto?
doubt it.
Nice post, those are some great pics!
[QUOTE=Sporkfire;21299620]the above, the is300 or better known as the Toyota Altezza started the altezza craze.[/QUOTE]
I know
[QUOTE=RedStar;21299638]I know[/QUOTE]
Those "ricer taillights" are stock.
I'm totally obsessed with Trueno AE86s
I need to find an AE101/100 engine so people won't be like
HERP DERP RICER just because I painted my hood black and added a black HKS sticker on the driver's door
[QUOTE=PILLS HERE!;21299814]I'm totally obsessed with Trueno AE86s
I need to find an AE101/100 engine so people won't be like
HERP DERP RICER just because I painted my hood black and added a black HKS sticker on the driver's door[/QUOTE]
you sayin' you have an 86?
[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21299716]Those "ricer taillights" are stock.[/QUOTE]
and actually good looking, the is300 has ricer-immunity concerning them.
[QUOTE=PILLS HERE!;21299814]I'm totally obsessed with Trueno AE86s
I need to find an AE101/100 engine so people won't be like
HERP DERP RICER just because I painted my hood black and added a black HKS sticker on the driver's door[/QUOTE]
be a man, get an f20
[QUOTE=Sporkfire;21299309]whats facepunch's thoughts on the Lexus IS300? Although I am looking at many "economy" cars the IS300 is something I'm heavily considering. It's sexy, reliable, smooth, nimble, and RWD. But I don't like the idea of buying a ten or eight year old luxury car even if it is reliable. The gas mileage sucks and I wouldn't expect that car too have much resale value 5 years from now.
[/QUOTE]
It's only good if you swap in a 2JZ-GTE and single turbo it.
Also all the negatives are of no relevance when buying a sports car. Those points are required for it to be a sports car.
[QUOTE=lemon_lover;21299972]It's only good if you swap in a 2JZ-GTE and single turbo it.
Also all the negatives are of no relevance when buying a sports car. Those points are required for it to be a sports car.[/QUOTE]
personally its quick enough for me stock, it's the handing, looks, and reliability that draw me. But still 22mpg... fucking horrid for such a small 210hp car.
My 1988 Trans Am GTA I took yesterday at Lake Mead here in Nevada.
[IMG]http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i217/Mustanglover246/102_0764.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i217/Mustanglover246/102_0758.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Sporkfire;21300015]personally its quick enough for me stock, it's the handing, looks, and reliability that draw me. But still 22mpg... fucking horrid for such a small 210hp car.[/QUOTE]
Thats why you get [i]more[/i] power and it doesn't have to work as hard. I've seen 20mpg stock evo's go to like 30mpg with 400whp as long as you stay out of boost.
[QUOTE=Sporkfire;21299943]you sayin' you have an 86?
[/QUOTE]
Yep
[quote=edberg]be a man, get an f20[/quote]
What?
[QUOTE=Pictrkol3;21300154]My 1988 Trans Am GTA I took yesterday at Lake Mead here in Nevada.
[/QUOTE]
Finally, someone else here with a TA :v:
what year TA do you have?
[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21299716]Those "ricer taillights" are stock.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RedStar;21299638]I know[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RedStar;21300794][/QUOTE]
You asked what started the craze...
[QUOTE=edberg;21300407]f20c engine swap[/QUOTE]
Honda Engine in a Toyota?
Something's very wrong here
[QUOTE=PILLS HERE!;21302536]Honda Engine in a Toyota?
Something's very wrong here[/QUOTE]
[img]http://i301.photobucket.com/albums/nn59/954supra/s2k2j.jpg?t=1271053639[/img]
Toyota Engine in a Honda?
Something's very awesome here
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
