• Firearms V. Super Redneck Edition
    5,000 replies, posted
[QUOTE=capgun;27307036]That looks rather familiar. Think I remember seeing somewhere that during WW2, primarily in the Pacific, that soldiers would slap a stock and a foregrip on a 1919 and start hefting it around like a squad support weapon. Think they called it the Stinger or something like that. ...obviously without the red dot sight.[/QUOTE] The Stinger was a one-off gun made by a Marine who took it off a Dauntless' rear gun, then added a new trigger mechanism and an M1 Garand stock. Basically it as an aircraft machine gun with a rate of fire of like, 1600 RPM if I remember right.
Posting my 1903A3 Remington Springfield. Along with my modest collection of WWII gear. A WWI helmet, 1918 16 3/4 in Springfield Armory Bayonet, M1943 Black Enamel Canteen, and an HBT WWII jacket. [img]http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/4275/dscn0005c.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=hoodoo456;27293635]Quoting to repost, as people seem to have stopped answering.[/QUOTE] It's not a bad price. I've seen them go for 250, I've seen them go for 150.
[QUOTE=Testabar;27321785]Posting my 1903A3 Remington Springfield. Along with my modest collection of WWII gear. A WWI helmet, 1918 16 3/4 in Springfield Armory Bayonet, M1943 Black Enamel Canteen, and an HBT WWII jacket. [img_thumb]http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/4275/dscn0005c.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] You only need a Colt 1911 now, and you can play an idiot soldier
[QUOTE=Lufttygger306;27331284]You only need a Colt 1911 now, and you can play [b]a ruggedly handsome and brave[/b] soldier[/QUOTE] fixed
[QUOTE=Esrange;27332290]fixed[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i55.tinypic.com/29qjiww.jpg[/IMG] Fixed *ironic
[QUOTE=shian;27296876]Here's some tacticool guns! [img_thumb]http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlhgkRvWimNSF4pgUh8rRIhSsUtcGvdNjGlqQQN6W907TNs4Tf[/img_thumb] [/QUOTE] Name of that gun?
[QUOTE=booster;27333091]Name of that gun?[/QUOTE] Kel-Tec PLR 22
First thing I thought was Kel Tec. :psyduck:
[QUOTE=Bean-O;27333370]Kel-Tec PLR 22[/QUOTE] When will we see your collection of guns? I'm just curious.
[QUOTE=booster;27333091]Name of that gun?[/QUOTE] I think its a Kal-tec PLR 30 though. the mag doesn't look like holds .22's.
[QUOTE=Campin Carl;27334368]When will we see your collection of guns? I'm just curious.[/QUOTE] If I recalled correctly he has a Mosin Nagant, a Ruger 10/22 and a Mozzerellaberg 500. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Lone_Star94;27336895]I think its a Kal-tec PLR 30 though. the mag doesn't look like holds .22's.[/QUOTE] it is a PLR 22, look at the magazine in said picture and compare with the one from Kel tec's site. [url]http://www.keltecweapons.com/our-guns/pistols/plr-22/[/url]
[QUOTE=RR_Raptor65;27317966]The Stinger was a one-off gun made by a Marine who took it off a Dauntless' rear gun, then added a new trigger mechanism and an M1 Garand stock. Basically it as an aircraft machine gun with a rate of fire of like, 1600 RPM if I remember right.[/QUOTE] Thats right, my bad. I had seen that several years ago, so my memory was foggy, at best.
[QUOTE=Testabar;27321785]Posting my 1903A3 Remington Springfield. Along with my modest collection of WWII gear. A WWI helmet, 1918 16 3/4 in Springfield Armory Bayonet, M1943 Black Enamel Canteen, and an HBT WWII jacket. [img_thumb]http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/4275/dscn0005c.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] dat brodie helmet.
Is an ACOG overkill for a .22? [IMG]http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b100/89Sunbird/Shooting/Dsc_0007-1.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Campin Carl;27334368]When will we see your collection of guns? I'm just curious.[/QUOTE] When I get a camera. Every time I get money I consider it, but I spend it on ammo instead. Oh yeah and if anyone is in the Bay Area I have a Mosin for sale, although it is very rough. I'm selling it for 75$. Or a trade for some 5.56/.223 ammo. Or a trade for a decent camera.
You can't have one of those fully automatic bolt action assault weapons! Diane Feinstein will have your head!
[QUOTE=Ridge;27340128]Is an ACOG overkill for a .22? [/QUOTE] I'd say yeah, but that's because I can't afford an ACOG.
[QUOTE=Ridge;27340128]Is an ACOG overkill for a .22? [img_thumb]http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b100/89Sunbird/Shooting/Dsc_0007-1.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] I'd say that entire weapon is overkill for .22 LR. Also, is that magazine a normal sized one you'd find on 5.56 versions of that rifle or the oddly long type I was looking at some pistols for Home Defense and later Concealed Carry and was thinking of a USP Compact if I could find one used at $500 range... I like Glocks but with most Glocks you got In or Out of the chamber, and a small as FUCK trigger pull weight. That's it. But with the USP Compact I was looking at, you have an actual safety, and an 11lb Trigger pull for the first shot, as well as a Hammer. Those three things just seem like they make it a MUCH better/safer weapon to have, especially to carry. And if I can't find one I was thinking of a SIG. Sig and HK make solid weapons Anyone own one?
I want a Ruger 10/22 but because I live in this wonderful country where we're not allowed to have such deadly and dangerous assault weapons I can't have one. Fuck you Australian Government
[QUOTE=Bean-O;27340974]When I get a camera. Every time I get money I consider it, but I spend it on ammo instead. Oh yeah and if anyone is in the Bay Area I have a Mosin for sale, although it is very rough. I'm selling it for 75$. Or a trade for some 5.56/.223 ammo. Or a trade for a decent camera.[/QUOTE] 75 in rough condition? That seems a bit much, i can find them for 60 in good condition around here. Maybe that's just me
[QUOTE=TheTalon;27341550]I'd say that entire weapon is overkill for .22 LR. Also, is that magazine a normal sized one you'd find on 5.56 versions of that rifle or the oddly long type I was looking at some pistols for Home Defense and later Concealed Carry and was thinking of a USP Compact if I could find one used at $500 range... I like Glocks but with most Glocks you got In or Out of the chamber, and a small as FUCK trigger pull weight. That's it. But with the USP Compact I was looking at, you have an actual safety, and an 11lb Trigger pull for the first shot, as well as a Hammer. Those three things just seem like they make it a MUCH better/safer weapon to have, especially to carry. And if I can't find one I was thinking of a SIG. Sig and HK make solid weapons Anyone own one?[/QUOTE] Why not give FN a go? They're just as good and you can find them in new condition at that price. Just look through Cheaper Than Dirt. FNP 357 sig $420 [url]http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/53893-55.html[/url] FNX 9mm, 17 rounds $555 [url]http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/62602-1.html[/url] FNX 40, 14 rounds $555 (this is the one I'm looking at for my Concealed Carry) [url]http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/62605-1.html[/url] [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] I'm not fond of HK myself, they're gigantic dicks about the pricing of their handguns and ego. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] And you'd be LUCKY to find any kind of firearm with HK's name (used or not) on it in the $600 price range.
[QUOTE=Esrange;27341946]75 in rough condition? That seems a bit much, i can find them for 60 in good condition around here. Maybe that's just me[/QUOTE] California, dude. Everything is more expensive here. And it's not like it doesn't come with some extras like a gun sock, snap caps, a little ammo.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;27341550]I'd say that entire weapon is overkill for .22 LR. Also, is that magazine a normal sized one you'd find on 5.56 versions of that rifle or the oddly long type[/QUOTE] With AR-15 .22lr conversions, you can either get stick mags that are just long and wide enough for a .22lr, or you can also get full size ones that will be mostly empty except for internal walls that guide the ammo in a single stack down the body, like these: [IMG]http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b100/89Sunbird/Shooting/22lr.jpg[/IMG] Also, the gun is overkill for a .22 because it is primarily a .223 rifle, but I bought the conversion kit today, so I decided to share a pic I hadn't posted before.
you're a hotty with a body
Thanks, cupcake
Been looking into buying a 'standard' M1A (M14), as my friend has one. However I'm in need of a handgun, so I'm going to buy a Taurus Model 4510 at some point. [img]http://www.taurususa.com/images/imagesMain/4410TrackerB.jpg[/img] In stainless steel. Can't wait for either or.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;27341550]I'd say that entire weapon is overkill for .22 LR. Also, is that magazine a normal sized one you'd find on 5.56 versions of that rifle or the oddly long type I was looking at some pistols for Home Defense and later Concealed Carry and was thinking of a USP Compact if I could find one used at $500 range... I like Glocks but with most Glocks you got In or Out of the chamber, and a small as FUCK trigger pull weight. That's it. But with the USP Compact I was looking at, you have an actual safety, and an 11lb Trigger pull for the first shot, as well as a Hammer. Those three things just seem like they make it a MUCH better/safer weapon to have, especially to carry. And if I can't find one I was thinking of a SIG. Sig and HK make solid weapons Anyone own one?[/QUOTE] I own a USP compact tactical after following a similar thought train. IT IS NOT WORTH IT. It is a compact gun that weighs more empty than my fullsize 1911 does full. It really just isn't as comfortable wearing it as it would seem. Get a Sig and be happy. I have a Sig P229R that I love to pieces. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Mr 23;27342879]However I'm in need of a handgun, so I'm going to buy a Taurus Model 4510 at some point. [/QUOTE] Why? =/
[QUOTE=GunFox;27342899] Why? =/[/QUOTE] Why not? Can't wait for the year-long discussion of why Taurus is shit ect ect
Not because it's Taurus, but because the .45LC/.410 gauge is such crap for really any purpose...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.