Lolicon is child pornography, and if you masturbate to it, you are a pedophile.
986 replies, posted
[QUOTE=jalit]No because it is just a drawing, it's not actual footage.[/QUOTE]
So you're completely fine with people setting up child molestation to record it in a stylised fashion with a pencil, but you're not OK with people setting up child molestation to record it with lenses and photoreactive film?
You're not one of those people who believes that photography steals part of your soul are you?
Awesome i am a pedophile :fap:
:q:
Wow, a sixteen page thread filled with people defending lolicon.
[QUOTE=chris0132]So you're completely fine with people setting up child molestation to record it in a stylised fashion with a pencil...?[/QUOTE]
Does this happen? Ever? Most people who draw anime have absolutely no idea how real people look, let alone do they use human subjects.
[img]http://bpm.cult.bg/storage/DragonballZ62.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=fenwick]Does this happen? Ever? Most people who draw anime have absolutely no idea how real people look, let alone do they use human subjects.
[img]http://bpm.cult.bg/storage/DragonballZ62.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Look at all of that golden hair...it's for die for...
I mean DBZ is fucking gay
[QUOTE=chris0132]Hmm, right, so by that logic hentai is not pornographic, because it doesn't depict sex, or people.
Photos of children are not real children either, no image is a real person. People are people and images are images.
Lolicon is a depiction of children, perhaps not real children, but children nonetheless, and it is pornographic therefore it is [I]child pornography.[/I]
This is not difficult to understand, all you have to do is stop assuming that child pornography = evil, and start saying that it's only wrong in certain circumstances, or is that too difficult?[/QUOTE]
Is it too hard to understand nobody gives a [b]fuck[/b] about lolicon, the main reason is, that it's drawn. Big fucking deal, little girls naked holy fuck.
You tell me, which is worse. Drawn HENTAI or real CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.
There is a massive difference.
[QUOTE=Ybbat]Lolicon can only make you a pedophile if... it can't since they arn't real.
"lolicon is child pornography" you say, but the problem is, the only reason child porn is illegal is since it can give long term negative effects to the children in it plus it's nasty. Thus, since Lolicon is drawings, it isn't child pornography, plus you can't verify a childs age who is drawn.
<insert pedobear here>[/QUOTE]
[b]Edit:[/b]
[QUOTE=chris0132]So you're completely fine with people setting up child molestation to record it in a stylised fashion with a pencil, but you're not OK with people setting up child molestation to record it with lenses and photoreactive film?
You're not one of those people who believes that photography steals part of your soul are you?[/QUOTE]
Sorry to break it to you, but lolicon is definently not child pornography ;) I myself don't look at pictures of lolicon, but it's hard understanding how could it be child pornography. It's not real.
[b]Edit:[/b]
[QUOTE=ROBLOX]Wow, a sixteen page thread filled with people defending lolicon.[/QUOTE]
I'm not defending it, it might look like it, but i'm denying what Chris mentioned in his post(s). As in, that lolicon would be child pornography. However it's your decision do you take it as CP or not, but it definently isn't. You're right, that it has children in it, but it's not real.
[QUOTE=NqWanté]Sorry to break it to you, but lolicon is definently not child pornography ;) I myself don't look at pictures of lolicon, but it's hard understanding how could it be child pornography. It's not real.[/QUOTE]
Because it's [I]pornography[/I] with [I]children[/I] in it.
If you can say lolicon is pornographic, or cute, or use any sort of descriptive noun about it whatsoever, you can also say it's got children in it. Things do not have to be real.
I really don't see where you get the idea that things have to be based in reality to be described this way. You can describe alyx from HL2 as being female, attractive, competent, agile, all sorts of things despite the fact that she doesn't actually exist. if you can do that you can and logically should describe lolicon as a form of child pornography because it is pornographic and features children, in as much as any form of art can feature males, females, cats, houses etc.
Might be a bit late on, but does anyone here seriously imagine people who fap to lolicon to be suddenly ashamed of it once you tell them you think it's wrong? Or does that really happen?
[QUOTE=chris0132]Because it's [I]pornography[/I] with [I]children[/I] in it.
If you can say lolicon is pornographic, or cute, or use any sort of descriptive noun about it whatsoever, you can also say it's got children in it. Things do not have to be real.
I really don't see where you get the idea that things have to be based in reality to be described this way. You can describe alyx from HL2 as being female, attractive, competent, agile, all sorts of things despite the fact that she doesn't actually exist. if you can do that you can and logically should describe lolicon as a form of child pornography because it is pornographic and features children, in as much as any form of art can feature males, females, cats, houses etc.[/QUOTE]
Yes, but Alyx is modeled off a [i]REAL[/i] person. Jamil Mullen:
[img]http://filesmelt.com/Imagehosting/pics/aff34a74414b6011e64fd6d22530431b.jpg[/img]
While Lolicon is drawn.
My take:
Whether or not you think lolicon is child porn, there's one extreme difference between the two: Impact.
Lolicon has no real world impact, and unless you can cite a real world example otherwise, the effects do not go past the screen and the person watching. The only real world repercussions of lolicon are wanker's wrist and people finding the files on your computer and assuming you're a pedo.
Child porn, on the other hand, is heavily cracked down upon because it has major effects on a real human, and real events such as human slave trafficking and kidnapping and selling children into sex slavery are a result of it.
The people who watch lolicon claim that the actors in question are over 18, while age has no bearing or effect on a drawing. People who watch child porn know fully well that the child in question is NOT the legal age, nor do they attempt to deny it.
Lolicon is perceived child porn with no real world impacts, while child porn is child porn with regular child porn impacts. Saying loli leads to pedophilia makes you the porn equivalent of Jack Thompson, and do you really want to be compared to Jack?
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta]Yes, but Alyx is modeled off a [i]REAL[/i] person. Jamil Mullen:
[img]http://filesmelt.com/Imagehosting/pics/aff34a74414b6011e64fd6d22530431b.jpg[/img]
While Lolicon is drawn.[/QUOTE]
[B][I]What?[/I][/B]
Are you seriously telling me that because this character in a videogame bears a visual resemblance to a real life person they are somehow real and can be described, while characters in anime cannot?
You don't actually believe that jamil mullen goes around fighting the combine do you?
For that matter you don't think anime artists haven't studied people and don't draw from life to some degree? I guarantee that all anime characters are in some way composites of a whole load of people so they are at least as based in reality as alyx is.
[QUOTE=TechedRonan]Masturbating to an image of a child, real or not, is wrong. Never, EVER think that you're doing something that's not wrong when doing it.[/QUOTE]
LoL, Go to hell, damn 'Mercians..
This is the internets, Free haven of freaks and pirates.
[QUOTE=LeYang]Hmm [img]http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/kotaku/2008/12/Sunny_MGS4.jpg[/img]
I guess Hideo is a Pedo to the OP.[/QUOTE]
I really do think, as charming as she is, sunny is a fucking stealth-loli.
[QUOTE=chris0132][highlight]Because it's [I]pornography[/I] with [I]children[/I] in it.[/highlight]
If you can say lolicon is pornographic, or cute, or use any sort of descriptive noun about it whatsoever, you can also say it's got children in it. Things do not have to be real.
I really don't see where you get the idea that things have to be based in reality to be described this way. You can describe alyx from HL2 as being female, attractive, competent, agile, all sorts of things despite the fact that she doesn't actually exist. if you can do that you can and logically should describe lolicon as a form of child pornography because it is pornographic and features children, in as much as any form of art can feature males, females, cats, houses etc.[/QUOTE]
HEY GUYS THIS JUST IN, LINES THAT ARE SHAPED LIKE A LITTLE GIRL IN AN EROTIC/PERVERTED POSITION IS REAL CHILDREN AND THEREFOR IF YOU LOOK/FAP TO IT YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE!
:rolleye:
[QUOTE=chris0132][B][I]What?[/I][/B]
Are you seriously telling me that because this character in a videogame bears a visual resemblance to a real life person they are somehow real and can be described, while characters in anime cannot?
You don't actually believe that jamil mullen goes around fighting the combine do you?
For that matter you don't think anime artists haven't studied people and don't draw from life to some degree? I guarantee that all anime characters are in some way composites of a whole load of people so they are at least as based in reality as alyx is.[/QUOTE]
No I don't think she fights the combine. If I did I'd be very :downs: now wouldn't I.
I'm saying that there [i]IS[/i] a [i]REAL[/i] person who looks almost identicle to the character because the character was based off a real person. Yes the artists of lolicon know atleast basic human anatomy, but they are ,most of the time, not based on a real person.
I now consider myself a pedophile.
[highlight]HOLY GOD DAMNED FUCKING HELL!!![/highlight]
HEY! You idiots over there, yeah, you guys, flooding into a thread and then arguing with people already in the middle of an argument, SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Or at least until you actually have read a few pages back and know what the hell it is you talking about.
Ergo, [b]CHRIS HAS NOT EVER SAID LOLICON IS WRONG.[/b] In fact, he has said numerous times, it is fine. He is only arguing that lolicon is cp because, well IT FUCKING IS. THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS BAD. [b]CP =/= evil[/b] It's only bad when kids are hurt, which, chris has already said.
Chris, unless you find this fun, which you might, I would recommend letting the idiots go on being idiots, especially because correcting them does nothing, because then they just leave to go misunderstand another person.
[b]Edit:[/b]
[QUOTE=RaptorRed]HEY GUYS THIS JUST IN, LINES THAT ARE SHAPED LIKE A LITTLE GIRL IN AN EROTIC/PERVERTED POSITION IS REAL CHILDREN AND THEREFOR IF YOU LOOK/FAP TO IT YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE!
:rolleye:[/QUOTE]
Yeah, this is especially for you, babe.
[QUOTE=ryandaniels][highlight]HOLY GOD DAMNED FUCKING HELL!!![/highlight]
HEY! You idiots over there, yeah, you guys, flooding into a thread and then arguing with people already in the middle of an argument, SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Or at least until you actually have read a few pages back and know what the hell it is you talking about.
Ergo, [b]CHRIS HAS NOT EVER SAID LOLICON IS WRONG.[/b] In fact, he has said numerous times, it is fine. He is only arguing that lolicon is cp because, well IT FUCKING IS. THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS BAD. [b]CP =/= evil[/b] It's only bad when kids are hurt, which, chris has already said.
Chris, unless you find this fun, which you might, I would recommend letting the idiots go on being idiots, especially because correcting them does nothing, because then they just leave to go misunderstand another person.
[b]Edit:[/b]
Yeah, this is especially for you, babe.[/QUOTE]
I think he finds it funny. I find it hilarious.
[QUOTE=bearwrestler]hentai and shit like that is for faggots
[b][highlight](User was banned for this post (Reason: Homophobia) [event] 140949 [/event])[/highlight][/b][/QUOTE]
Can't use that as a reson to ban him homophobia is a real phobia, fun fact #546231
[QUOTE=chris0132]Because it's [I]pornography[/I] with [I]children[/I] in it.
If you can say lolicon is pornographic, or cute, or use any sort of descriptive noun about it whatsoever, you can also say it's got children in it. Things do not have to be real.
I really don't see where you get the idea that things have to be based in reality to be described this way. You can describe alyx from HL2 as being female, attractive, competent, agile, all sorts of things despite the fact that she doesn't actually exist. if you can do that you can and logically should describe lolicon as a form of child pornography because it is pornographic and features children, in as much as any form of art can feature males, females, cats, houses etc.[/QUOTE]
So, what's your conclusion? Jail all those who fap to sum loli?
[QUOTE=lewisdacool]Can't use that as a reson to ban him homophobia is a real phobia, fun fact #546231[/QUOTE]
No, it's not. It's just bigotry.
[QUOTE=ryandaniels][highlight]HOLY GOD DAMNED FUCKING HELL!!![/highlight]
HEY! You idiots over there, yeah, you guys, flooding into a thread and then arguing with people already in the middle of an argument, SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Or at least until you actually have read a few pages back and know what the hell it is you talking about.
Ergo, [b]CHRIS HAS NOT EVER SAID LOLICON IS WRONG.[/b] In fact, he has said numerous times, it is fine. He is only arguing that lolicon is cp because, well IT FUCKING IS. THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS BAD. [b]CP =/= evil[/b] It's only bad when kids are hurt, which, chris has already said.
Chris, unless you find this fun, which you might, I would recommend letting the idiots go on being idiots, especially because correcting them does nothing, because then they just leave to go misunderstand another person.
[b]Edit:[/b]
Yeah, this is especially for you, babe.[/QUOTE]
Watching people rage amuse me :D
[QUOTE=chris0132]So you're completely fine with people setting up child molestation to record it in a stylised fashion with a pencil, but you're not OK with people setting up child molestation to record it with lenses and photoreactive film?
You're not one of those people who believes that photography steals part of your soul are you?[/QUOTE]
I'm not saying it's right, but it is still just an interpretation of the artist. Not actual events.
ITT: chris0132 forgets the difference between fiction and reality, and the pedos try to argue sense.
[QUOTE=ryandaniels][highlight]HOLY GOD DAMNED FUCKING HELL!!![/highlight]
HEY! You idiots over there, yeah, you guys, flooding into a thread and then arguing with people already in the middle of an argument, SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Or at least until you actually have read a few pages back and know what the hell it is you talking about.
Ergo, [b]CHRIS HAS NOT EVER SAID LOLICON IS WRONG.[/b] In fact, he has said numerous times, it is fine. He is only arguing that lolicon is cp because, well IT FUCKING IS. THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS BAD. [b]CP =/= evil[/b] It's only bad when kids are hurt, which, chris has already said.
Chris, unless you find this fun, which you might, I would recommend letting the idiots go on being idiots, especially because correcting them does nothing, because then they just leave to go misunderstand another person.
[b]Edit:[/b]
Yeah, this is especially for you, babe.[/QUOTE]
Can we clone you and replace a lot of people on the forum with your clones?
[b]Edit:[/b]
[QUOTE=amute]So, what's your conclusion? Jail all those who fap to sum loli?[/QUOTE]
No, my conclusion is that loli is CP.
That's it.
Before anybody else starts telling me what my conclusions are I suggest they pay more attention to my argument.
[QUOTE=chris0132]Can we clone you and replace a lot of people on the forum with your clones?
[b]Edit:[/b]
No, my conclusion is that loli is CP.
That's it.
Before anybody else starts telling me what my conclusions are I suggest they pay more attention to my argument.[/QUOTE]
:love:
How can you people spend sixteen pages arguing whether or not pictures of little kids getting raped isn't CP.
Oh, since Shota isn't I'm safe. phew.
[QUOTE=ryandaniels][highlight]HOLY GOD DAMNED FUCKING HELL!!![/highlight]
HEY! You idiots over there, yeah, you guys, flooding into a thread and then arguing with people already in the middle of an argument, SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Or at least until you actually have read a few pages back and know what the hell it is you talking about.
Ergo, [b]CHRIS HAS NOT EVER SAID LOLICON IS WRONG.[/b] In fact, he has said numerous times, it is fine. He is only arguing that lolicon is cp because, well IT FUCKING IS. THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS BAD. [b]CP =/= evil[/b] It's only bad when kids are hurt, which, chris has already said.
Chris, unless you find this fun, which you might, I would recommend letting the idiots go on being idiots, especially because correcting them does nothing, because then they just leave to go misunderstand another person.
[b]Edit:[/b]
Yeah, this is especially for you, babe.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/6337/fffffffffffffffffffffffeq3.jpg[/img]
loli is fake child pornography.
It's like saying a hooker is your girlfriend.
[QUOTE=UNIX_nikomo]loli is fake child pornography.
It's like saying a hooker is your girlfriend.[/QUOTE]
No it's like saying a drawn woman is your girlfriend.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.