• Lolicon is child pornography, and if you masturbate to it, you are a pedophile.
    986 replies, posted
Real Children isn't that good of an excuse. Pedophilia is an sexual attraction or love of children. Drawn or Real, they are children. Sure, just Drawn. But it still means You're a Pedophile.
[QUOTE=doommarine23]Real Children isn't that good of an excuse. Pedophilia is an sexual attraction or love of children. Drawn or Real, they are children. Sure, just Drawn. But it still means You're a Pedophile.[/QUOTE] So I draw pictures of the whitehouse and the pentagon being blown up in horrific detail. am i a terrorist y/n?
Doesn't work the same way. Some-one draws a picture of a CHILD having SEX. You Masturbate to it. It's an Fetish, Pedophilia. Your's doesn't fit the genre of an Fetish. But you bring up an interesting point.
snip
[QUOTE=doommarine23]Doesn't work the same way. Some-one draws a picture of a CHILD having SEX. You Masturbate to it. It's an Fetish, Pedophilia. Your's doesn't fit the genre of an Fetish. But you bring up an interesting point.[/QUOTE] My point is, it's a thought crime. And while a thought can be sick and fucked up, it isn't hurting anyone. Photographic Child pornography does hurt children because of obvious reasons, and looking/paying for it supports that type of industry. Now, drawn is different. It might be fucked up to you, and hell, it might be fucked up to the world, but is it hurting anybody? Does it cause anyone emotional distress or hurt? Calling someone a pedophile under the law (which is the only thing that matters) just because they get off the drawn anime children is a very slippery slope if you ask me, because, where will they stop with that type of argument? Will people be labeled as potential murderers because they like to draw gory scenes? Will people be viewed as terrorists because they draw pictures of buildings being blown up? Will people be viewed as car jacking criminals because they like to play Grand Theft Auto? While those are not "fetishes", they are still thoughts and things that only happens in virtual reality, and as long as it happens in virtual reality, it should not be a crime, because then, shit could spin out of control very [B]VERY[/B] fast.
[QUOTE=Ronin63]So I draw pictures of the whitehouse and the pentagon being blown up in horrific detail. am i a terrorist y/n?[/QUOTE] Do you masturbate to it? This is why the "Video games must make me a killer then!" logic fails. You don't masturbate to it, and you don't find it sexually arousing, so it can't be compared.
[QUOTE=Ronin63]My point is, it's a thought crime. And while a thought can be sick and fucked up, it isn't hurting anyone. Photographic Child pornography does hurt children because of obvious reasons, and looking/paying for it supports that type of industry. Now, drawn is different. It might be fucked up to you, and hell, it might be fucked up to the world, but is it hurting anybody? Does it cause anyone emotional distress or hurt? Calling someone a pedophile under the law (which is the only thing that matters) just because they get off the drawn anime children is a very slippery slope if you ask me, because, where will they stop with that type of argument? Will people be labeled as potential murderers because they like to draw gory scenes? Will people be viewed as terrorists because they draw pictures of buildings being blown up? Will people be viewed as car jacking criminals because they like to play Grand Theft Auto? While those are not "fetishes", they are still thoughts and things that only happens in virtual reality, and as long as it happens in virtual reality, it should not be a crime, because then, shit could spin out of control very [B]VERY[/B] fast.[/QUOTE] I guess you're right.
[QUOTE=RaptorRed]HEY GUYS THIS JUST IN, LINES THAT ARE SHAPED LIKE A LITTLE GIRL IN AN EROTIC/PERVERTED POSITION IS REAL CHILDREN AND THEREFOR IF YOU LOOK/FAP TO IT YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE! :rolleye:[/QUOTE] Good job making yourself look silly.
still got a point the only reason why child porn is illegal is because of age of consent and pornography laws concerning that. drawings don't cause any emotional or mental damage to children, therefor there really isn't anything wrong with them.
What if I just say fuck the OP, I'm creating a new category, in which people that like Lolicon are called a LOLIPHILE. What do you think of that now OP? Also I will twist your logic into if you like females, then you're a pedophile according to the logic of the OP.
Lolicon is not CP because there are no children involved. Just lines and color. :science:
[QUOTE=Uberman77883]Lolicon is not CP because there are no children involved. Just lines and color. :science:[/QUOTE] Lines are CP too... duh.
[QUOTE=amute]So, what's your conclusion? Jail all those who fap to sum loli? [/QUOTE] That's my conclusion, sicko. Really though, the act of producing drawn child pornography is not as heinous as the production of live child porn but the act of masturbating to child porn drawn or otherwise shows a dangerous sexual defect that should require immediate intervention. Think about it. You perverts are masturbating to visual depictions of children so underdeveloped that the only thing telling their genders apart is a haircut. Its revolting.
What if we have fucking loli fetish?
Then you have a child porn fetish. Drawn pornography is still pornography. Pornography is material depicting erotic content intended to cause sexual excitement. It can be drawn, written, photographed and recorded. Even though pornography is mostly legal, some subsets of pornography are not like snuff and bestiality. In the same way drawn child pornography is a subset of child pornography and should be illegal. In short, if you fetishize loli you are fetishizing something that falls under child pornography, you peadophile.
What if we have a fucking car fetish?
18 in a week Does this make me clear for the upcoming week? Both are disgusting, never seen neither, don't plan on it. Live and let live, though
People are still posting here? I thought we discussed every nuance of this stupid issue.
It just seems that as a species we are extremely obsessed with children. Just look on the news, every second article will be about children. [b]Edit:[/b] [URL=http://img372.imageshack.us/my.php?image=childrenlolrg1.png][IMG]http://img372.imageshack.us/img372/9933/childrenlolrg1.th.png[/IMG][/URL] Wow today is actually quite low on children.
[QUOTE=chris0132] No, my conclusion is that loli is CP. That's it. Before anybody else starts telling me what my conclusions are I suggest they pay more attention to my argument.[/QUOTE] Drawings =/= Real images. [b]Edit:[/b] [QUOTE=ROBLOX] Think about it. You perverts are masturbating to visual depictions of children so underdeveloped that the only thing telling their genders apart is a haircut. Its revolting.[/QUOTE] OH WELL. I'll think to you next time I fap to Loli. [b]Edit:[/b] [QUOTE=ROBLOX]Then you have a child porn fetish. Drawn pornography is still pornography. Pornography is material depicting erotic content intended to cause sexual excitement. It can be drawn, written, photographed and recorded. Even though pornography is mostly legal, some subsets of pornography are not like snuff and bestiality. In the same way drawn child pornography is a subset of child pornography and should be illegal. In short, if you fetishize loli you are fetishizing something that falls under child pornography, you peadophile.[/QUOTE] You're a bit deluded. I bet you're a right wing Christian.
I like how the OP failed to mention Loli's bastard brother, Shotacon. Is that CP? Or are you OK with it, OP?
[QUOTE=darkzero226]I like how the OP failed to mention Loli's bastard brother, Shotacon. Is that CP? Or are you OK with it, OP?[/QUOTE] Nah that's fine. A grown woman fucking a young boy is fine. It's only bad if it's a man fucking a girl.
[QUOTE=Dr Smashy]Nah that's fine. A grown woman fucking a young boy is fine. It's only bad if it's a man fucking a girl.[/QUOTE] Yeah I find that strange too. You see women teachers all the time fucking their students and they get pitiful community service. Whilst the men teachers get life sentences. Totally un-biased and fair justice system :rolleye:
[QUOTE=jalit]Yeah I find that strange too. You see women teachers all the time fucking their students and they get pitiful community service. Whilst the men teachers get life sentences. Totally un-biased and fair justice system :rolleye:[/QUOTE] Okay, say you had a younger sister who was in grade school and she secretly gets into a relationship with the janitor. You then find out about the situation, and on top of that the janitor has been manipulating her all along. Do you: A) Want to give him 6 months community service? B) Want to give him 50 years in jail? C) Rip his fucking dick off and force feed him his own testicles then use a blow torch on his eyes? You pick C but can only settle for B? Yeah, I thought so. Edit: And he looks like this. [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v123/Tie23/Other/2_26_rader_dennis.jpg[/IMG] Oh man, option C man... So fucking tempting.
[QUOTE=TiE23]Okay, say you had a younger sister who was in grade school and she secretly gets into a relationship with the janitor. You then find out about the situation, and on top of that the janitor has been manipulating her all along. Do you: A) Want to give him 6 months community service? B) Want to give him 50 years in jail? C) Rip his fucking dick off and force feed him his own testicles then use a blow torch on his eyes? You pick C but can only settle for B? Yeah, I thought so.[/QUOTE] Yeah but if the janitor is female and the school kid is a male then you wouldn't want to force feed her vagina? If not why?
[QUOTE=jalit]Yeah but if the janitor is female and the school kid is a male then you wouldn't want to force feed her vagina? If not why?[/QUOTE] Yeah, exactly. When it comes to sexual child abuse fairness for the defendant isn't the highest priority. Besides, any dude would want some pussy if he could get it.
[QUOTE=Ronin63]My point is, it's a thought crime. And while a thought can be sick and fucked up, it isn't hurting anyone. Photographic Child pornography does hurt children because of obvious reasons, and looking/paying for it supports that type of industry. Now, drawn is different. It might be fucked up to you, and hell, it might be fucked up to the world, but is it hurting anybody? Does it cause anyone emotional distress or hurt? Calling someone a pedophile under the law (which is the only thing that matters) just because they get off the drawn anime children is a very slippery slope if you ask me, because, where will they stop with that type of argument? Will people be labeled as potential murderers because they like to draw gory scenes? Will people be viewed as terrorists because they draw pictures of buildings being blown up? Will people be viewed as car jacking criminals because they like to play Grand Theft Auto? While those are not "fetishes", they are still thoughts and things that only happens in virtual reality, and as long as it happens in virtual reality, it should not be a crime, because then, shit could spin out of control very [B]VERY[/B] fast.[/QUOTE] Where exactly did I mention crime? I said it was child pornography, I did not say child pornography which extends to lolicon is inherently wrong. I object to it if people are harmed, but if they are not, I do not. But just because I don't object to it does not mean I should stop calling it what it is. [b]Edit:[/b] [QUOTE=TiE23]Okay, say you had a younger sister who was in grade school and she secretly gets into a relationship with the janitor. You then find out about the situation, and on top of that the janitor has been manipulating her all along. Do you: A) Want to give him 6 months community service? B) Want to give him 50 years in jail? C) Rip his fucking dick off and force feed him his own testicles then use a blow torch on his eyes? You pick C but can only settle for B? Yeah, I thought so.[/QUOTE] Ten to fifteen years and prevent him from being employed near children again, also ensure that he has a permanent parole officer. [b]Edit:[/b] [QUOTE=amute]Drawings =/= Real images.[/QUOTE] Images = images and pornography = sexual imagery.
If you find this awkward, you're probably a closet pedo. [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v123/Tie23/Other/1214126358738.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v123/Tie23/Other/Woah---Akward.jpg[/IMG] Yeah... maybe... or yeah, she does look creepy.
[QUOTE=TiE23]If you find this awkward, you're probably a closet pedo. Yeah...[/QUOTE] No, her eyes are just fucking creepy
[QUOTE=TiE23]If you find this awkward, you're probably a closet pedo. [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v123/Tie23/Other/Woah---Akward.jpg[/IMG] Yeah... maybe... or yeah, she does look creepy.[/QUOTE] Nah, I just think the Gaussian blur looks retarded.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.