[QUOTE=BBOOBBYY!;30523112]Don't have any rails?
[img]http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/3478/tapemaster.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Hey now, A2s are best M16.
[QUOTE=ossumsauce;30523196]Hey now, A2s are best M16.[/QUOTE]
A1s are.
ar-10 you fucks
[QUOTE=BBOOBBYY!;30523112]Don't have any rails?
[img]http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/3478/tapemaster.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Remind me of some guy on youtube who taped a flashlight without any internals (lamp, batteries etc.) on his rifle and called it a scope
[QUOTE=Joazzz;30523667]A1s are.[/QUOTE]
Because who needs to shoot?
[QUOTE=FPKawaii;30526152]Because who needs to shoot?[/QUOTE]
i think you mean the original m16 used by the airforce at first
m16a1 is fine
The M16A1 wasn't actually shit, it just wasn't meant to be used in the type of environment found in Vietnam. It was intended for use in a European climate.
[QUOTE=Taepodong-2;30526893]The M16A1 wasn't actually shit, it just wasn't meant to be used in the type of environment found in Vietnam. It was intended for use in a European climate.[/QUOTE] Agreed, he is right. im gonna be the first to say i like the M16A1, quite a lot actually, but i happen to like the A2 better. Mostly because of early exposure to DF:BHD.
[QUOTE=Taepodong-2;30526893]The M16A1 wasn't actually shit, it just wasn't meant to be used in the type of environment found in Vietnam. It was intended for use in a European climate.[/QUOTE]
And overenthusiasm over its supposed 'cleaning-free' design was another factor. Once proper cleaning kits were issued and some minor defects corrected, the M16A1 did well enough in Vietnam.
[QUOTE=catbarf;30527511]And overenthusiasm over its supposed 'cleaning-free' design was another factor. Once proper cleaning kits were issued and some minor defects corrected, the M16A1 did well enough in Vietnam.[/QUOTE] Exactly. I suppose that the only reason that they said "cleaning-free" was that it was supposed to compete with the AK47, and as we all know, nothing makes an AK47 jam.
I like the A3 because I think putting optics on top of the carry handle looks silly.
A3 is cool because Call of Duty hasn't touched it. Same with the A2, but there's a group of kids in my area who play Left4Dead and they think they know everything about the A2.
[QUOTE=cardfan212;30529604]A3 is cool because Call of Duty hasn't touched it. Same with the A2, but there's a group of kids in my area who play Left4Dead and they think they know everything about the A2.[/QUOTE]
Lemme guess, they think it has a 50 round mag? and yes, A3 is p. cool. But it pisses me off because i know some CODfags that didnt know there was a A2 OR A3. My first argument was that why would there be an A1 then skip randomly to A4? They are like "but then why wouldnt they have heard of it?" I responded with: "get out. we dont like your kind here."
"cod touched it so its gayy"
"cod community thinks its the best thing int he world and likes to grope it because it's "JUST LIKE IN BLOPS""
doesn't mean something becomes uncool tho!!!
[editline]17th June 2011[/editline]
people still wear acus !!
people still wear tiger stripe!!!
people still wear marpat !!!
etc and gay shit but i do see the point
that's completely irrelevent since no xX-cod=slayer-Xx really notices the camos
thats true thank god
[img]http://i.cubeupload.com/LJqlFX.jpg[/img]
It's like a pump shotgun combined into a mini 14/sporterized ruger 10/22
[editline]18th June 2011[/editline]
:psyduck:
Bullpup MP5
[img]http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/6227/myweapon2r.jpg[/img]
Shitty attempt to make an FX-05
[img]http://img806.imageshack.us/img806/7586/myweapon1tu.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=ossumsauce;30528064]Exactly. I suppose that the only reason that they said "cleaning-free" was that it was supposed to compete with the AK47, and as we all know, nothing makes an AK47 jam.[/QUOTE]
Except when the magazine decides to be a piece of ass and loads 2 rounds into the chamber.
Bulgarian Mags, to be exact
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;30565466]Except when the magazine decides to be a piece of ass and loads 2 rounds into the chamber.
Bulgarian Mags, to be exact[/QUOTE]
similar to my AR-15.. sometimes when im at the range with my dad i'll fire in semi mode but it will burst fire 3 rounds and then the range master yells at us for firing "FULLY AUTO" :s
if your ar15 loaded 2 rounds in the chamber and you fired the gun would explode.
[QUOTE=Taepodong-2;30550026]Bullpup MP5
[img]http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/6227/myweapon2r.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Sweet idea, felt like doing one myself.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Yr6al.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=W0w00t;30565802]if your ar15 loaded 2 rounds in the chamber and you fired the gun would explode.[/QUOTE]
no i mean, it was on semi but when sometimes when i would pull the trigger instead of firing 1 round as semi, it would fire 3 as if the gun had a burst fire mode
tl;dr it fired like an m16
something is probably wrong with your trigger sear
[QUOTE=venom;30567329]something is probably wrong with your trigger sear[/QUOTE]
ye ill prolly have to get it checked out.. but im going shooting again in 2 weeks but i need to wait until then before i do anything
[QUOTE=Camarilla;30568337]ye ill prolly have to get it checked out.. but im going shooting again in 2 weeks but i need to wait until then before i do anything[/QUOTE]
You should probably just go get it checked out really soon, if anyone asks whether it's a legal machinegun you're going to be in hot water.
That is definitely a trigger sear problem (many semi-auto AKs can be converted to full auto simply by tying back the trigger sear). Courts have repeatedly rules that a mechanical defect that makes a weapon fire multiple times makes it count as a machine gun, so until it's fixed you have an unregistered, unlicensed Title II weapon. Better get that fixed ASAP.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.