James Cameron's Avatar - General

[QUOTE=fakedout;19519077]just saw it and it was good also was it just me or was the blue chick's nips always seen[/QUOTE] She had some weird crusty brace made out of twigs I never noticed any boob, she was also nearly flat.

[QUOTE=Majache;19519116]Er, really? Because they look absolutely identical to me.[/QUOTE] What is wrong with you in this thread? How do they look identical? The Hornet has more of a slanted, slimmer body built completely different than the Viper; which is more of a Blackhawk helicopter. The only large similarity are the dual rotors, which is a common idea for futuristic aircraft such as these two.

[QUOTE=Nova25;19519052]That's a little loud of you. I had similar thoughts after I finished watching this movie. I already hate humans enough, and after seeing the Na'vi frolic around in bio-luminescent plants on a beautiful planet, leading happy meaningful lives, I could barely stand getting into my car, spitting fumes out everywhere, bumping into unintelligent, fat shitbricks throughout the parking lot and theatre lobby; only to wake up the next morning and sit in a dull school building with a clusterfuck of idiots. Of course there's nothing similar to real life about the plot and universe the movie takes place in, but the movie has a strong environmental feel to it, and it also shows how horrible humans can be. I'd love to have a reason to live; I simply exist just to exist. I'm a student without a job who does nothing all day. The Na'vi seem to have reason for life, they embrace it and love it. Living like that would be wondrous.[/QUOTE] Wow. Okay, 1. But the Na'vi are not like anything that exists anywhere. They're a fucking fantasy. I could wish I was in hooker land, where the pussy comes cheap and is free of disease, but that doesn't make reality less or more than what it is. Not to mention they're a bunch of one dimensional fake fucking blue elves, but eh. 2.HOW. You just said the movie has no connection to reality, how can it demonstrate anything about reality. That's like if I watched Die Hard and at the end I was all, "Wow, the british are assholes." 3.What meaning? They run around having hair sex with animals. what does that have to do with purpose? I mean, fuck their society is backwards. They don't get new technology, they don't increase their standard of living, they're just forever stuck in this Native American hippy period. That sounds pretty fucking bleak to me. Also, has anyone ever told you that you sound like a less witty Spider Jerusalem? [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Constant trolling despite numerous warnings." - Jaanus))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=Majache;19519116]Er, really? Because they look absolutely identical to me.[/QUOTE] Like I said, the marines were from halo.

[QUOTE=Majache;19519116]Er, really? Because they look absolutely identical to me.[/QUOTE] That's like saying a ferrari and a honda civic look the same because they are cars.

[QUOTE=Nova25;19519178]What is wrong with you in this thread? How do they look identical? The Hornet has more of a slanted, slimmer body built completely different than the Viper; which is more of a Blackhawk helicopter. The only large similarity are the dual rotors, which is a common idea for futuristic aircraft such as these two.[/QUOTE] Another example of the most likely story isn't always the most interesting. [editline]02:54AM[/editline] [QUOTE=FunnyBunny;19519271]That's like saying a ferrari and a honda civic look the same because they are cars.[/QUOTE] Not really. There are plenty of awesome futuristic helicopter designs that don't look just like Halo, so why does it end up looking like halo? And those two cars do not look the same in the way that the viper and the hornet look the same.

[QUOTE=Majache;19519199]Wow. Okay, 1. But the Na'vi are not like anything that exists anywhere. They're a fucking fantasy. I could wish I was in hooker land, where the pussy comes cheap and is free of disease, but that doesn't make reality less or more than what it is. Not to mention they're a bunch of one dimensional fake fucking blue elves, but eh. 2.HOW. You just said the movie has no connection to reality, how can it demonstrate anything about reality. That's like if I watched Die Hard and at the end I was all, "Wow, the british are assholes." 3.What meaning? They run around having hair sex with animals. what does that have to do with purpose? I mean, fuck their society is backwards. They don't get new technology, they don't increase their standard of living, they're just forever stuck in this Native American hippy period. That sounds pretty fucking bleak to me. Also, has anyone ever told you that you sound like a less witty Spider Jerusalem?[/QUOTE] I'm honestly not so sure I should answer any of your points or even give recognition to any of things you've said, but, I have nothing better to do. The Na'vi are nothing that exist anywhere. Of course, but they clearly have thoughts, language, functional society and social skills -- they are humanoids and have qualities similar to human beings. The thoughts and lifestyle they live were written by a human, James Cameron; it's not as if the thoughts and ideas are completely fake shit that don't make any sense. Jake Sully says to Eywa in his prayers "Look back into Grace's memories, look at the place we come from... they killed their mother." -- Jake is human, he came from Earth. That line really speaks to us, because it is true, we are damaging the earth. Does this make sense to you, or can you not see past your shut-everything-down-in-this-thread attitude? And what meaning? Each member in a clan of Na'vi serves a purpose. Neytiri is a hunter, her father is the clan leader, her mother is the 'shaman', all other Na'vi people have jobs, but they all love each other; they work together. They live in harmony with their planet and their all-holy deity Eywa. The entire planet works in harmony. When they kill an animal, they apologize and explain the significance of the animal's death, how it feeds the tribe. The Na'vi people have a bond with all of the animals, they're not just simply having 'hair sex' -- you're now just being stupid. I think most people would agree that the Na'vi (although fictional) would be a species to look up to. I'm not saying we should be more like them or anything, I'm just saying that idea of a species created by James Cameron is positively recognizable. If you've seen the movie, and have thought about it, it's clear that the Na'vi do not need any new technology. Their beds were alive; they could touch them and have them stretch over to protect them; they kill animals without any trouble, using the arrows covered in neurotoxins, then finishing them off with a clean stab into the heart with their knives. They Na'vi DO NOT NEED any new technology, cars, roads, automatic rifles are not the way they live, plus, such things would damage Pandora's environment. Their society is perfectly functional, their tools are more than efficient, and their standard of living is obviously fine. They're not going to clear-cut their forests and place suburbs overtop. Now honestly, I don't see how you can respond rationally. If you even do reply, Majache, I expect it to be as dull and stupid as the post I've just replied to.

[QUOTE=Majache;19518969]You people, the ones who say that this shit changed your perspective on the world, you're the worst. This film is so =/= real life that it's just inexcusable to say that either intersects the other. I mean fuck, who is like any of the people in that movie? Nobody that's who. You've got Burke, and Chip Hazard, and generic action hero #4256. Oh, and blue titties. How is that in any way like real life?[/QUOTE] I'm not saying it changed my perspective of the world or any of that bullshit, I'm just saying, I enjoyed it, and it made me think how nice different planets could be compared to ours, and that our race can be pretty selfish sometimes. But at the end of the day, it's just a movie still to me, I'm not gonna go out and start firing bows at people, or trying to connect my hair to a horse. I just got very gripped to the story, as in my opinion it was a very well made film, isn't that what you should praise it for? Rather than have a tantrum because someone enjoyed a film?

[QUOTE=Nova25;19519450]I'm honestly not so sure I should answer any of your points or even give recognition to any of things you've said, but, I have nothing better to do. The Na'vi are nothing that exist anywhere. Of course, but they clearly have thoughts, language, functional society and social skills -- they are humanoids and have qualities similar to human beings. The thoughts and lifestyle they live were written by a human, James Cameron; it's not as if the thoughts and ideas are completely fake shit that don't make any sense. Jake Sully says to Eywa in his prayers "Look back into Grace's memories, look at the place we come from... they killed their mother." -- Jake is human, he came from Earth. That line really speaks to us, because it is true, we are damaging the earth. Does this make sense to you, or can you not see past your shut-everything-down-in-this-thread attitude? And what meaning? Each member in a clan of Na'vi serves a purpose. Neytiri is a hunter, her father is the clan leader, her mother is the 'shaman', all other Na'vi people have jobs, but they all love each other; they work together. They live in harmony with their planet and their all-holy deity Eywa. The entire planet works in harmony. When they kill an animal, they apologize and explain the significance of the animal's death, how it feeds the tribe. The Na'vi people have a bond with all of the animals, they're not just simply having 'hair sex' -- you're now just being stupid. I think most people would agree that the Na'vi (although fictional) would be a species to look up to. I'm not saying we should be more like them or anything, I'm just saying that idea of a species created by James Cameron is positively recognizable. If you've seen the movie, and have thought about it, it's clear that the Na'vi do not need any new technology. Their beds were alive; they could touch them and have them stretch over to protect them; they kill animals without any trouble, using the arrows covered in neurotoxins, then finishing them off with a clean stab into the heart with their knives. They Na'vi DO NOT NEED any new technology, cars, roads, automatic rifles are not the way they live, plus, such things would damage Pandora's environment. Their society is perfectly functional, their tools are more than efficient, and their standard of living is obviously fine. They're not going to clear-cut their forests and place suburbs overtop. Now honestly, I don't see how you can respond rationally. If you even do reply, Majache, I expect it to be as dull and stupid as the post I've just replied to.[/QUOTE] Oh really? You mean like when they captured the people who fucked their children with incendiary missiles and let them go? Cause, yeah, anything even remotely human would do the same. Yeah, sure. We're killing teh earth! Look, I believe in environmentalism, to a point. I think it's good to preserve nature and all that shit. But we're far from killing the planet. I mean, we're shockingly close to killing ourselves, but the planet's fine. Always has been. You know why? BECAUSE IT'S A PEBBLE IN THE FUCKING SKY. YOU CAN'T KILL IT. That's not how life works. There isn't a single lasting civilization that has ever been like that, nor is there any animal or plant that is like that. Nothing is like that. Know why? Because nature is a system of competition. All things that reproduce would choke their own environment as long as you dangled a carrot in front of it's mouth and their were enough of them. That's how natural selection works. Pandora is a fantasy created by someone who doesn't have the slightest clue as to how nature functions. And their hair is used in sexual reproduction, it's hair sex. Yes, we should go back to a tribe of tree living know nothings, ridden with disease and famine. That was the paragon people! Oh really. So I take it that the Na'vi are immune to Miscarriages, disease, famine, overpopulation, natural disasters, and war? Think before you fucking speak. Before technology we were a bunch of ignorant simpletons, festering and writhing in the mud of a downtrodden part of Africa. And if the Na'vi actually existed, they'd be in the same situation. That's because Pandora is a fucking fantasy that could never exist in the real world. Yeah. Your logic is absolutely flawless. Not even God himself coudl poke holes in your points. Bitch, please. [editline]03:18AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Rage.;19519544]I'm not saying it changed my perspective of the world or any of that bullshit, I'm just saying, I enjoyed it, and it made me think how nice different planets could be compared to ours, and that our race can be pretty selfish sometimes. But at the end of the day, it's just a movie still to me, I'm not gonna go out and start firing bows at people, or trying to connect my hair to a horse. I just got very gripped to the story, as in my opinion it was a very well made film, isn't that what you should praise it for? Rather than have a tantrum because someone enjoyed a film?[/QUOTE] Well that's understandable. I disagree, but I can respect that. I mean sort of. Avatar is hardly a story written by a master, and therefor isn't the best thing to look for when it comes to the nature of humanity. But if it sparked your imagination, sure. Now, if you said "Pandora is teh best place evar and teh film was the most spiritual thing in teh wurld" then I would have something to piss over.

[QUOTE=Majache;19519617]Oh really? You mean like when they captured the people who fucked their children with incendiary missiles and let them go? Cause, yeah, anything even remotely human would do the same. Yeah, sure. We're killing teh earth! Look, I believe in environmentalism, to a point. I think it's good to preserve nature and all that shit. But we're far from killing the planet. I mean, we're shockingly close to killing ourselves, but the planet's fine. Always has been. You know why? BECAUSE IT'S A PEBBLE IN THE FUCKING SKY. YOU CAN'T KILL IT. That's not how life works. There isn't a single lasting civilization that has ever been like that, nor is there any animal or plant that is like that. Nothing is like that. Know why? Because nature is a system of competition. All things that reproduce would choke their own environment as long as you dangled a carrot in front of it's mouth and their were enough of them. That's how natural selection works. Pandora is a fantasy created by someone who doesn't have the slightest clue as to how nature functions. And their hair is used in sexual reproduction, it's hair sex. Yes, we should go back to a tribe of tree living know nothings, ridden with disease and famine. That was the paragon people! Oh really. So I take it that the Na'vi are immune to Miscarriages, disease, famine, overpopulation, natural disasters, and war? Think before you fucking speak. Before technology we were a bunch of ignorant simpletons, festering and writhing in the mud of a downtrodden part of Africa. And if the Na'vi actually existed, they'd be in the same situation. That's because Pandora is a fucking fantasy that could never exist in the real world. Yeah. Your logic is absolutely flawless. Not even God himself coudl poke holes in your points. Bitch, please.[/QUOTE] You're such an unintelligent an unforgiving brute of a poster I will quit here. You clearly do not understand what air and tone are behind my posts, nor can you relate or post on this topic in any other way than persistent argument. I wasn't trying to start a fight, I was simply trying to explain to you possibilities and give you another flavour of the movie, but you'll have none of it; and in the end, it is that, it is a movie. A film shown to you for the simple reason of money. You paid a plethora of different companies and people for your entertainment, you received a viewing of the film, and that's about it. There's no reason for us to continue like this. So how about I rate you a heart and give you an internet handshake and we can quit here, because this isn't going to go anywhere with me thinking I'm smart and witty and correct, and you thinking you're correct and I am stupid.

[QUOTE=Nova25;19519716]You're such an unintelligent an unforgiving brute of a poster I will quit here. You clearly do not understand what air and tone are behind my posts, nor can you relate or post on this topic in any other way than persistent argument. I wasn't trying to start a fight, I was simply trying to explain to you possibilities and give you another flavour of the movie, but you'll have none of it; and in the end, it is that, it is a movie. A film shown to you for the simple reason of money. You paid a plethora of different companies and people for your entertainment, you received a viewing of the film, and that's about it. There's no reason for us to continue like this. So how about I rate you a heart and give you an internet handshake and we can quit here, because this isn't going to go anywhere with me thinking I'm smart and witty and correct, and you thinking you're correct and I am stupid.[/QUOTE] Yeah, I argue. Like a [I]brute.[/I] I'm sorry I just don't "get you". Mayhaps you should be talking to someone who does if that bothers you so much. And all of this is just after you said it would be completely irrational to debunk anything you said. [editline]03:27AM[/editline] I'm trying to get it into your head that pissing and moaning about how Pandora is the best place in the world and you wish you were there is like pissing and moaning about the lack of a corporeal lollypop kingdom where you can fight raisin bran dragons. Or pissing and moaning because humanity fails to live up to the societal standards of "Leave it to Beaver". Which some people do, depressingly enough.

[QUOTE=Majache;19519116]Er, really? Because they look absolutely identical to me.[/QUOTE] [img]http://plaidlemur.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/blackhawk.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.army-technology.com/projects/apache/images/apache1111.jpg[/img] My god I cannot tell the difference.

[QUOTE=Majache;19519746]Yeah, I argue. Like a [I]brute.[/I] I'm sorry I just don't "get you". Mayhaps you should be talking to someone who does if that bothers you so much. And all of this is just after you said it would be completely irrational to debunk anything you said. [editline]03:27AM[/editline] I'm trying to get it into your head that pissing and moaning about how Pandora is the best place in the world and you wish you were there is like pissing and moaning about the lack of a corporeal lollypop kingdom where you can fight raisin bran dragons. Or pissing and moaning because humanity fails to live up to the societal standards of "Leave it to Beaver". Which some people do, depressingly enough.[/QUOTE] I wasn't pissing and moaning about how Pandora is the best place in the world though! I clearly understand that it is fictional place and it is in a movie and shit, I believe I picked this conversation up by trying to defend another poster's thoughts about how he felt kind of upset after watching the movie. So to make my thoughts simpler: I felt sad after the movie because life, in my eyes, sucks compared to that of the Na'vi. There, nice and done.

[QUOTE=FunnyBunny;19519799][IMG]http://plaidlemur.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/blackhawk.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.army-technology.com/projects/apache/images/apache1111.jpg[/IMG] My god I cannot tell the difference.[/QUOTE] Those are completely different. What the fuck are you talking about? [editline]03:31AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Nova25;19519830][B]I wasn't pissing and moaning about how Pandora is the best place in the world though![/B] I clearly understand that it is fictional place and it is in a movie and shit, I believe I picked this conversation up by trying to defend another poster's thoughts about how he felt kind of upset after watching the movie. So to make my thoughts simpler: [B]I felt sad after the movie because life, in my eyes, sucks compared to that of the Na'vi.[/B] There, nice and done.[/QUOTE] ?

[QUOTE=Majache;19519836] ?[/QUOTE] I can feel sad after watching the movie [B]without[/B] pissing and moaning about how Pandora is the best place on the world.

[QUOTE=Nova25;19519871]I can feel sad after watching the movie [B]without[/B] pissing and moaning about how Pandora is the best place on the world.[/QUOTE] That's what I'm saying. You shouldn't be sad. It's like being sad about the non existence of fairies. Do you mind that I'm venting onto you the rage of someone who lives in LA who's surrounded by stupid pricks who think Avatar was the most brilliantly conceived masterwork of all time because they've never watched a foreign film in their lives and so have the experience of a confused baby?

[QUOTE=Majache;19519836]Those are completely different. What the fuck are you talking about? [editline]03:31AM[/editline] ?[/QUOTE] I'm comparing them to your original statement. You said that the Halo Hornet and the Avatar Vtol were exactly the same. You denied my comparison of a Ferrari and a Honda, so I give you a comparison of 2 flying vehicles. These also closely resemble the vehicles in Avatar and Halo. [IMG]http://www.virginmedia.com/images/avatar-the-game-screens2-431.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://cookga.net/Halo/images/Hornet.jpg[/IMG] Look at this. There are tons of differences, you are just too ignorant to admit it. 1. The shape of the body. The hornet has a tiny body that resembles the shape of a rhombus. The one in avatar has a body that is much wider, longer, and resembles the black hawk. [IMG]http://plaidlemur.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/blackhawk.jpg[/IMG] 2. The VTOL engines. The hornet has wings that extend from the body, at the end of which are tiny propellers that can't be more than 3 feet in diameter. The one in Avatar has no wings, and the propellers are attached directly to the body. Not to mention that instead of some flimsy little propellers like the hornet's, the ship has propellers that look to be 10 ft. in diameter, if not more. 3. Many other differences, although not as large as the first 2, still pretty big. These include the platforms on each side of the Halo hornet on which marines can sit. In the Avatar version, there is no platform, instead the troops sit on the inside of the ship. You can see how the comparison of a Blackhawk and an Apache comes into play here. All you're doing is being ignorant on ship designs. You're acting like just because it's a Vtol and has engines on both sides, it's suddenly a carbon copy of a halo vehicle. It's like someone saying Star Wars and BSG were the same thing because they were in space and had ship battles.

[QUOTE=Majache;19519944] Do you mind that I'm venting onto you the rage of someone who lives in LA who's surrounded by stupid pricks who think Avatar was the most brilliantly conceived masterwork of all time because they've never watched a foreign film in their lives and so have the experience of a confused baby?[/QUOTE] The only thing worse than a mainstream tool is a pretentious snob who thinks they're more cultured for watching arcane black and white movies from some obscure former-Soviet country.

[QUOTE=lmaoboat;19520004]The only thing worse than a mainstream tool is a pretentious snob who thinks they're more cultured for watching arcane black and white movies from some obscure former-Soviet country.[/QUOTE] Technically isn't that the definition of more cultured, having more knowledge of other cultures? No, but seriously. The people in this town fucking worship fucking Steven Spielberg and shit. I mean, If you go to the film school, just ask the kids who their favorite film maker is and 50 fucking percent will say Spielberg. And that's not bad in itself, it's just that then they fucking refuse to watch any film that isn't American out before 1980. And then Avatar comes out and everyone's like, "LOL MOST ORIGINAL AND BEST MOVIE EVR". Which isn't true at all, you can see a fuckton of the stuff Cameron is going for in stuff like Nausicaa. But the main problem is, nobody in this fucking town watches any film, and then when the newest, latest thing comes out they espouse it as the fucking shit of the gods. [editline]03:50AM[/editline] Look, I'm not saying I'm somehow a better person than them, I'm saying that this is a fucking movie town where no one watches movies. And it pisses me the fuck off.

I watched it in 3D and I thought it was very entertaining but also had a sense of deja vu. I knew what was going to happen before it did.

[QUOTE=CSargeP;19520123]I watched it in 3D and I thought it was very entertaining but also had a sense of deja vu. I knew what was going to happen before it did.[/QUOTE] thats cause this film is Pocahontas in the future.

[QUOTE=Majache;19517852] uhhhhhh Yeah, sort of. .[/QUOTE] [url=http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_References_to_Aliens_in_Halo]It's not just sort of.[/url]

[QUOTE=FunnyBunny;19520002]I'm comparing them to your original statement. You said that the Halo Hornet and the Avatar Vtol were exactly the same. You denied my comparison of a Ferrari and a Honda, so I give you a comparison of 2 flying vehicles. These also closely resemble the vehicles in Avatar and Halo. [IMG]http://www.virginmedia.com/images/avatar-the-game-screens2-431.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://cookga.net/Halo/images/Hornet.jpg[/IMG] Look at this. There are tons of differences, you are just too ignorant to admit it. 1. The shape of the body. The hornet has a tiny body that resembles the shape of a rhombus. The one in avatar has a body that is much wider, longer, and resembles the black hawk. [IMG]http://plaidlemur.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/blackhawk.jpg[/IMG] 2. The VTOL engines. The hornet has wings that extend from the body, at the end of which are tiny propellers that can't be more than 3 feet in diameter. The one in Avatar has no wings, and the propellers are attached directly to the body. Not to mention that instead of some flimsy little propellers like the hornet's, the ship has propellers that look to be 10 ft. in diameter, if not more. 3. Many other differences, although not as large as the first 2, still pretty big. These include the platforms on each side of the Halo hornet on which marines can sit. In the Avatar version, there is no platform, instead the troops sit on the inside of the ship. You can see how the comparison of a Blackhawk and an Apache comes into play here. All you're doing is being ignorant on ship designs. You're acting like just because it's a Vtol and has engines on both sides, it's suddenly a carbon copy of a halo vehicle.[/QUOTE] Those don't matter. Art isn't about the details, it's about the gist of it. You have to look at things more widely. They're both brushed green pressed steel VTOL vehicles. And that's not the only thing they could have done, there's a lot of different ways they could have gone about it that they didn't, and it ends up looking like a Halo vehicle. Design wise? If you're looking at the blueprints, sure, yeah, they're totally different. But if you're just looking at pictures of them, they could easily be grouped together. [editline]03:56AM[/editline] [QUOTE=CPShArp;19520181][URL="http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_References_to_Aliens_in_Halo"]It's not just sort of.[/URL][/QUOTE] Oh, yeah, the first game is Aliens. But it branches off as time goes on.

Well then, go ahead and draw me a VTOL that has never been created before.

Halo: marines fighting against aliens GIANT gunships that rarely attack but never die smaller "hornets" that attack and always die Funky pistol weird assault rifles Part of the game consisted of you playing as the alien Avatar: marines fighting against aliens GIANT gunships that rarely attack but never die smaller "hornets" that attack and die Funky pistol weird assault rifles Part of the movie was played as an alien [editline]05:02AM[/editline] Just off of the top of my head while watching the movie

[QUOTE=lolwutdude;19520146]thats cause this film is Dances With Wolves in the future.[/QUOTE] Fixed

[QUOTE=MedicWine;19521287]Halo: marines fighting against aliens GIANT gunships that rarely attack but never die smaller "hornets" that attack and always die Funky pistol weird assault rifles Part of the game consisted of you playing as the alien Avatar: marines fighting against aliens GIANT gunships that rarely attack but never die smaller "hornets" that attack and die Funky pistol weird assault rifles Part of the movie was played as an alien [editline]05:02AM[/editline] Just off of the top of my head while watching the movie[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.alicia-logic.com/capsimages/a_001AlMatthews.jpg[/img]

Just watched it. Incredible.

It was worth watching, but I'd give it around a 7. The art and everything is cool, but I absolutely hated the creatures and Na'vi because there's no reason why they would evolve to be that way. Why would all of the animals have an extra pair of legs? It gives no advantages. I did like the flying things though. Didn't like how the forests and everything were mostly green, too. They should have made the forests be a different colour, like red. I don't remember the colour of their sun, I think it was blue though, for some reason. If it was blue then the plants could've been orangish to take advantage of the blue light. The 3D was decent but the movie should have been shot at a higher frame rate. A lot of the very close objects looked very choppy. I loved the use of depth of field with the 3D, it was very nice.

I had NO interest in seeing it at all. I think the trailer didn't describe the movie very well, and it seemed so unrealistic. But as time passed, I heard more and more about the movie and I decided to go with 10 other friends to the cinema and watch it. I'll probably be watching it again, and it has to be one of the best movies ever. 3D worked well, which was nice.