Art Majors get naked and flail for 3 minutes. It's art, guys

[Pasalaqcua]

:)

edit: Oh fuck theres a guy in the video

[Blackizzle]

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;24989540]I could have been an art major but instead I chose something that requires thought.

Silly me.[/QUOTE]

Seriously, these "Artist" really do give us a bad name. Not all people who call themselves artist are the same.

[Mac2468]

Say what you guys want but compared to the chick that smeared spoiled spaghetti-o's, cut up her pants, then pissed herself this is pretty good. At least this actually took practice.

[matt54]

[img]http://www.familyguyfun.com/images/cleveland.gif[/img]

That's just nasty.

[Crest]

[QUOTE=mbutler2;24988664]This reminds me of....That video with the girl...........rotten spaghettios.......scissors...........hipsters.........Oh god.[/QUOTE]

I remember that... stuff.

[Doomish]

2:20

what

[matt54]

[QUOTE=Brt5470;24990473]I remember that... stuff.[/QUOTE]

I had to see a hypnotist to help me forget.

[FuckaNinja]

[QUOTE=Brt5470;24990473]I remember that... stuff.[/QUOTE]

Show me.

[Welcometohel]

Ever heard of scissors? or a razor?

Its ok for guys to not shave their bush (for a while) but not for ladies.

[aydin690]

I'm surprised it hasn't been taken down yet.

[editline]06:23PM[/editline]

[QUOTE=Welcometohel;24990797]Ever heard of scissors? or a razor?

Its ok for guys to not shave their bush (for a while) but not for ladies.[/QUOTE]

Don't you just love it when kids think what they see in porns portrays reality?

[rammaster]

What am I missing here?

[Agent_Wesker]

[QUOTE=Welcometohel;24990797]Ever heard of scissors? or a razor?

Its ok for guys to not shave their bush (for a while) but not for ladies.[/QUOTE]

Who are you to decide what is ok for the opposite sex, they should not have to shave themselves for your pleasure especially if you do not hold yourself to the same standard.

[Doriol]

if you deny that this is art, you are a fucking idiot

[editline]08:28PM[/editline]

[QUOTE=aydin690;24990899]I'm surprised it hasn't been taken down yet.
[/QUOTE]

why should it be? it's not porn

[Edthefirst]

They ruined the song for me.

And yes, it may be "art", but it's stupid and silly. Was there any real reason for her to be naked? Couldn't she have symbolized her cause any better by just wearing appropriated clothing?

Whatever.

[Doriol]

[QUOTE=Edthefirst;24991119]
And yes, it may be "art", but it's stupid and silly. Was there any real reason for her to be naked? Couldn't she have symbolized her cause any better by just wearing appropriated clothing?

Whatever.[/QUOTE]

oh sorry I didn't realise it was the 18th century. I heard that women are showing their legs now and even shaving them, that's fucking crazy. they should know their place, which is in the kitchen or sucking my dick 24/7

[Edthefirst]

[QUOTE=Doriol;24991141]oh sorry I didn't realise it was the 18th century. I heard that women are showing their legs now and even shaving them, that's fucking crazy. they should know their place, which is in the kitchen or sucking my dick 24/7[/QUOTE]

Wow, I haven't even seen an elbow yet.

Honestly, it wasn't meant to be sexist at all, I'm just saying that it makes it much stranger for the average person to even classify this as art because of the nudity. I don't give a shit, but I can't connect at all with anything in that video.

But of course my comment obviously means that women should be in no place other than the kitchen being my bitch, and on that note I have a song for this occasion.

[url]http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/298148[/url]

[Lick]

I think that sometimes people take themselves a little too seriously.

[tehfrog]

WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT?!
/caps

[thisispain]

fyi art doesn't imply it needs to be good or meaningful

[editline]07:35PM[/editline]

[QUOTE=Javascript;24988883]
fuck these idiots who consider everything art[/QUOTE]

if i had a dime for every time i was called an idiot for some random thing i'd rich or something

i don't

you suck how about that

[Elspin]

[QUOTE=Doriol;24991141]oh sorry I didn't realise it was the 18th century. I heard that women are showing their legs now and even shaving them, that's fucking crazy. they should know their place, which is in the kitchen or sucking my dick 24/7[/QUOTE]

There's nothing wrong with them being naked, it would be just as stupid if they were wearing clothes. There is nothing 'art' about this, it's just someone flailing around naked to an old song. If you saw a girl with a model-like body doing it you'd be sitting on the sidelines going "ATTENTION WHORE!", and if anything that makes you more sexist than any of the people you're calling sexists.

[Doriol]

[QUOTE=Elspin;24992279]There is nothing 'art' about this[/QUOTE]

oh my god please stop

[thisispain]

[QUOTE=Elspin;24992279]There is nothing 'art' about this, it's just someone flailing around naked to an old song.[/QUOTE]

but that's what art is

it's just expressing your shit or whatever

fuck you're exactly like those people that said you had to go to school for 20 years to play music

guess what they were wrong

[xxfalconxx]

... did i just see porn on youtube?

[detectivep]

This may be art, but regardless, it's stupid, silly, and a stain on my eyes.

[Doriol]

[QUOTE=xxfalconxx;24992378]... did i just see porn on youtube?[/QUOTE]

holy fuck the amount of sexually repressed people in this thread is just mind-blowing

nudity isn't hardcore porn

[Elspin]

[QUOTE=thisispain;24992326]but that's what art is

it's just expressing your shit or whatever

fuck you're exactly like those people that said you had to go to school for 20 years to play music

guess what they were wrong[/QUOTE]

If art means anything, then art means nothing. Defining the words as expressing yourself makes the act of speaking itself art, and therefore removes any meaning from the word and makes it useless.

No, something doesn't have to be terribly amazing to be art, but this is just dumb. You wouldn't call a 14 year old boy wanking in his bedroom art, despite the fact that he may just be expressing his interest for large-breasted women

[thisispain]

[QUOTE=Detective P;24992383]This may be art, but regardless, it's stupid, silly, and a stain on my eyes.[/QUOTE]

right i don't think anybody is arguing against that

i mean i would just to spite everyone but i'm tired and just came from work

[Elspin]

[QUOTE=Doriol;24992385]holy fuck the amount of sexually repressed people in this thread is just mind-blowing

nudity isn't hardcore porn[/QUOTE]

This I agree with at least, people shouldn't be so uptight about nudity.

[tehfrog]

0:59, when she started dancing while they were basically having sex, i giggled.

[thisispain]

[QUOTE=Elspin;24992398]If art means anything, then art means nothing. [/QUOTE]

yeah that's right it doesn't mean anything

[QUOTE=Elspin;24992398]Defining the words as expressing yourself makes the act of speaking itself art[/QUOTE]

you don't consider spoken-word performance art?

[QUOTE=Elspin;24992398]and therefore removes any meaning from the word and makes it useless.[/QUOTE]

it is quite useless yeah

[QUOTE=Elspin;24992398]No, something doesn't have to be terribly amazing to be art, but this is just dumb.[/QUOTE]

right, but none of this has anything to do with art

[QUOTE=Elspin;24992398]You wouldn't call a 14 year old boy wanking in his bedroom art, despite the fact that he may just be expressing his interest for large-breasted women[/QUOTE]

well if used in a proper context it could be

you think when people show wanking in an art movie it's just for the sake of showing wanking?