• Art Majors get naked and flail for 3 minutes. It's art, guys
    263 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Doriol;24992291]oh my god please stop[/QUOTE] yeah real art is closeup photos of animals
[QUOTE=Doriol;24992385]holy fuck the amount of sexually repressed people in this thread is just mind-blowing nudity isn't hardcore porn[/QUOTE] Nevertheless, youtube videos cannot contain nudity. Heck, videos are often taken down if they're 'too suggestive'. [IMG]http://imgur.com/H6YF0.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Fkpuz Version 1;24992469]yeah real art is closeup photos of animals[/QUOTE] well the way you shit post is an art as well
Also, that's not art. That's just some hippies going apeshit.
Holy fuck its a mini Amazon Rainforest on her crotch
[QUOTE=thisispain;24992438]well if used in a proper context it could be you think when people show wanking in an art movie it's just for the sake of showing wanking?[/QUOTE] You're using [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning]circular logic[/url] by automatically declaring the movie is art, and then saying that the scene in which they were wanking would be art because it's in an art movie Q.E.D. Back to intelligent discussion, yes masturbation can be used in art but that still doesn't change the fact that it would have to be in the appropriate context to say something about the human condition, which completely deviates from the point of my example (just expressing yourself isn't enough, it has to be relevant to something). This says nothing, it's just dumb. It'd be like me running around my school wearing nothing but a bra and quoting anti-gay scripture from the bible. I just pulled that bullshit off the top of my head and I bet you people would interpret it as an artistic statement, was it though? No, it was just me acting like a retard.
[QUOTE=aydin690;24992488]Also, that's not art. That's just some hippies going apeshit.[/QUOTE] jimi hendrix was a hippie going apeshit
This video isn't suppose to stand for anything, it's just random flailing and dancing.
Aw man I was about to post this
[QUOTE=Elspin;24992514]You're using [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning]circular logic[/url] by automatically declaring the movie is art, and then saying that the scene in which they were wanking would be art because it's in an art movie[/QUOTE] no i was declaring it was an art movie where each scene is specifically written to mean something, therefor the wanking scene does qualify as art DON'T YOU FUCKING DARE USE THAT BULLSHIT i will rip your ass to piece [QUOTE=Elspin;24992514]I bet you people would interpret it as an artistic statement, was it though?[/QUOTE] who the fuck is you people also that's an intentional fallacy [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_fallacy[/url] see i just beat you at what you tried to do, it doesn't matter if the artist intended a statement or not, the intent is entirely unimportant therefor to qualify some things as art and others as not art is simply a subjective statement using a word that describes an object you're using art as an opposite of shit, which is simply incorrect, you cannot change the meaning of words to suit your fancy i mean art is used by schools to mean colouring with pencils and crayons, that doesn't mean art is only colouring using pencils and crayons, therefor your argument is incorrect because it makes assumptions based on opinion, while my argument is based on the factual definition of a word
What the hell.... Uhh... Err.... [QUOTE=mbutler2;24988664]This reminds me of....That video with the girl...........rotten spaghettios.......scissors...........hipsters.........Oh god.[/QUOTE]
So does this mean I can balance nude on the heads of statues as long as I call it art?
Am I the only person who doesn't mind it that much? If that's how they want to express themselves, then they can do that. I wouldn't do it the same way, but whatever.
[QUOTE=thisispain;24992518]jimi hendrix was a hippie going apeshit[/QUOTE] Yes, but he didn't flail around like an idiot naked and call it art. At least I think he didn't.
[QUOTE=Sitkero;24992622]So does this mean I can balance nude on the heads of statues as long as I call it art?[/QUOTE] i guess whatever you want what the fuck is wrong with you people, why is this such a issue
lawl at the guy who didnt get erect on stage while kissing that naked chick...I guess he got used to it after so many practices. An watch the guy in the front who couldnt decide what to look at...the naked chick doing acrobats or simulating sex
[QUOTE=MrAfroShark70;24992643]Yes, but he didn't flail around like an idiot naked and call it art. At least I think he didn't.[/QUOTE] this is just dumb i cannot see where the definition of art affects your life, get over it you big baby
[QUOTE=thisispain;24992602]you're using art as an opposite of shit, which is simply incorrect, you cannot change the meaning of words to suit your fancy[/QUOTE] What? That was nothing to do with what I said. I even stated earlier that art doesn't have to be good, bad reading. What I said was that people will often try to interpret things as an artistic statement when really the person is just acting retarded. The point of which being, someone could just, say... get naked with 2 of their friends and flail around to "Take on me" and sell tickets to it playing it off as "art", while people in the audience go "Wow... fascinating..."
[QUOTE=Zally13;24992636]Am I the only person who doesn't mind it that much? If that's how they want to express themselves, then they can do that. I wouldn't do it the same way, but whatever.[/QUOTE] yeah i don't really get it, i'm just here because i like to pick on people [editline]08:06PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Elspin;24992680]What? That was nothing to do with what I said. I even stated earlier that art doesn't have to be good, bad reading.[/QUOTE] yes it does you consider this shit and not art, ergo you think art is the opposite of shit this isn't hard to grasp unless you have strict definitions of art, which is a ridiculous thing [QUOTE=Elspin;24992680]What I said was that people will often try to interpret things as an artistic statement when really the person is just acting retarded.[/QUOTE] what you said was incorrect, it doesn't matter if the person was acting retarded. intentional fallacy, the artist is not important, the art is important and focusing on the artist detracts from art [QUOTE=Elspin;24992680]The point of which being, someone could just, say... get naked with 2 of their friends and flail around to "Take on me" and sell tickets to it playing it off as "art", while people in the audience go "Wow... fascinating..."[/QUOTE] okay, why is this such a fucking issue to you in my opinion, you are so stuck up that you have a superiority complex, or you are jealous of the attention they get nothing in any of your posts suggests any critical thought, therefor this argument is meaningless because you argue on the basis of nothing
[QUOTE]On stage, Ann Liv Young has rolled around in her dog’s ashes, had sex with her co-stars, covered herself in blood, drank urine and attacked a PETA activist. Off stage, she has given the audience lap dances and ridiculed her own cast for fucking up during a performance. [/QUOTE] :geno: What.
seriously your entire argument is "PEOPLE THINK THIS IS ART, THAT ANNOYS ME" which is childish
[QUOTE=thisispain;24992670]this is just dumb i cannot see where the definition of art affects your life, get over it you big baby[/QUOTE] I don't think anyone's day is being affected by this as much as you think. It's just a funny video on a website where funny videos are sometimes posted. I don't see why this is such an issue with you, did it strike a nerve?
[quote]On stage, Ann Liv Young has rolled around in her dog’s ashes, had sex with her co-stars, covered herself in blood, drank urine and attacked a PETA activist. Off stage, she has [b]given the audience lap dances[/b] and ridiculed her own cast for fucking up during a performance.[/quote] brb goin to art show
[QUOTE=Fkpuz Version 1;24992759]I don't think anyone's day is being affected by this as much as you think. It's just a funny video on a website where funny videos are sometimes posted. I don't see why this is such an issue with you, did it strike a nerve?[/QUOTE] yeah the part where people go around calling things art and not art stroke a huge nerve no not really go and continue, i enjoy the "intelligent" debate on art
I heard take on me and started laughing so damn hard.
i'm not even debating with you, I agree it's art. I'm just making fun of it. I'm allowed to do that right? I mean if it's okay with you I'll just continue.
shes a great dancer [editline]03:12AM[/editline] also what the fuck they randomly start having sex
[QUOTE=thisispain;24992684][b]in my opinion, you are so stuck up that you have a superiority complex, or you are jealous of the attention they get[/b] [/QUOTE] Yeah because I totally want people to see my body in public, flailing it around to take on me, and call it art. Now I know you hate when people this isn't art, it is, but it's :downs: art.
[QUOTE=thisispain;24992684]okay, why is this such a fucking issue to you in my opinion, you are so stuck up that you have a superiority complex, or you are jealous of the attention they get nothing in any of your posts suggests any critical thought, therefor this argument is meaningless because you argue on the basis of nothing[/QUOTE] It's not a huge issue to me, I wouldn't by any means declare myself an artist nor am I in the slightest bit stuck up. I just think it's ridiculous that the art world is in some kind of competition to see who can be the vaguest possible to get more attention while there are people who are probably doing really interesting things that you never hear much about. I just like people who are actually working hard to come up with great ideas rather than people who are likely to just be idiots being vague for money (see: "modern art"). I find it really odd that you're accusing me of being stuck up when the "art" form I'm criticising is just about the most stuck up thing on the planet. Like the "modern artist" who says something along the lines of "Yeah well y'know the mona lisa was alright I guess but it doesn't have enough meaning like my stack of shoes with pebbles in them representing earth being trapped in capitalism". Like the film critic who pretentiously says half-life can't be art because the only game he's ever played is pacman.
[QUOTE=thisispain;24992650]i guess whatever you want what the fuck is wrong with you people, why is this such a issue[/QUOTE] Chill man. I was just makin' a joke, didn't realize a debate on what is art had cropped up until I posted it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.