So, the weapons have the same models and sounds as MW2. And basically everything looks and feels exactly the same. How can you release this as a game, should be a DLC.
MAN i can't wait to throw small stones at cardboard boxes AGAIN!
Thumbed down the video for having no pr0 360 degrees mlg style noscope moments.
"Modern Warfare 3's multiplayer is best in class"
Hah. hahahahahaha. heh.
kill confirmed
holy shit it looks exactly the same as MW2, and i'm not even one of those anti-cod bandwagoners.
this just looks fucking identical
[QUOTE=CanadianBill;33081515]"Modern Warfare 3's multiplayer is best in class"
Hah. hahahahahaha. heh.[/QUOTE]
learning center class
OK seriously, that is enough. No one cares that you don't like the cod series. I personally think that they are fine, and quite enjoyable. And most descent CoD players won't go around saying "BF3 sucks" (actually correct me, they probably will, but a few won't. :v:)
Is this not already old news? Maybe I should go ahead and be a troll and just say...
BattLefieLD 3 pWnZzz Mw3. (Butthurt 12 year old voice) and oh yeah I'm just sooo upset that nothing changed with [B][U]"MODERN"[/U][/B] Warfare from 2009-2011.
[B]95%[/B] of people who talk shit about CoD or BF will buy it anyway.
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Blue Meanie;33082319]OK seriously, that is enough. No one cares that you don't like the cod series. I personally think that they are fine, and quite enjoyable. And most descent CoD players won't go around saying "BF3 sucks" (actually correct me, they probably will, but a few won't. :v:)[/QUOTE]
I haven't seen one cod fan talking shit about BF. I am a HUGE cod fan and I even play BF3. I play them because they're games and that's what is meant to be done with them. Most CoD fans will be glad to talk nice about BF3.
[QUOTE=jbthekid;33082381]Is this not already old news? Maybe I should go ahead and be a troll and just say...
BattLefieLD 3 pWnZzz Mw3. (Butthurt 12 year old voice) and oh yeah I'm just sooo upset that nothing changed with [B][U]"MODERN"[/U][/B] Warfare from 2009-2011.
[B]95%[/B] of people who talk shit about CoD or BF will buy it anyway.
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
I haven't seen one cod fan talking shit about BF. I am a HUGE cod fan and I even play BF3. I play them because they're games and that's what is meant to be done with them. Most CoD fans will be glad to talk nice about BF3.[/QUOTE]Yea, I guess it is only really immature people that talk shit about bf3.
"gun on gun action"
"Hurr durr, you hate something that lots of people hate, therefore it's a bandwagon"
I think you'll find a majority of CoD "fans" play the game because of bandwagoning. All the cool kids play it guys! It must be good!
[QUOTE=jbthekid;33082381]Is this not already old news? Maybe I should go ahead and be a troll and just say...
BattLefieLD 3 pWnZzz Mw3. (Butthurt 12 year old voice) and oh yeah I'm just sooo upset that nothing changed with [B][U]"MODERN"[/U][/B] Warfare from 2009-2011.
[B]95%[/B] of people who talk shit about CoD or BF will buy it anyway.
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
I haven't seen one cod fan talking shit about BF. I am a HUGE cod fan and I even play BF3. I play them because they're games and that's what is meant to be done with them. Most CoD fans will be glad to talk nice about BF3.[/QUOTE]
Do you like, completely ignore all youtube comments on MW3 or BF3 videos? 95% of those comments are something along the lines of "bf3 sux u fags mw3 owns u scrubs".
Every single time I see that WW3/MW3 thing I think of that literal trailer or whatever it was.
WORLD WAR 3? MORE LIKE MODERN WARFARE 3 YEAH WE'RE EDGYYY
man the engine looks really aged
compare the streets of paris in mw3 and bf3 and there is a huge difference
I love how no one can shoot without using the sights.
i would get mw3 but sadly quick scoping is still in i think, why oh why they didnt just have a gamemode in which you can qs and not in any other game mode then all the faggots can play that and everyones happy.
My personal reason why I stopped playing CoD games wasn't really because they keep milking it, it's because Activision is in this purely for money and nothing else. They don't even try to hide it.
As for the video, it really looks like MW2 but the gamemode seems like a step in a good direction. The "Kill Confirmed" would drive me insane though. That is if I ever played it.
Wait wait wait hold up everyone. I'm seriously confused THAT WAS ACTUALLY MW3??. I thought the video was a joke putting mw2 gameplay in a montage with mw3 commentators.
New game modes, old everything else
I forgot how bad the guns sounded in mw2.
Also, a lot of games today try to make it right, but CoD still has what I would call fart guns. It's not a big deal but they don't have that satisfying feeling when you use them.
[QUOTE=simkas;33083604]Do you like, completely ignore all youtube comments on MW3 or BF3 videos? 95% of those comments are something along the lines of "bf3 sux u fags mw3 owns u scrubs".[/QUOTE]
I don't spend all day watching CoD and BF videos, so no.
[QUOTE=Marden;33084847]Also, a lot of games today try to make it right, but CoD still has what I would call fart guns. It's not a big deal but they don't have that satisfying feeling when you use them.[/QUOTE]
It's a big deal when 90% of the time you are firing them. You can fire a 50 caliber rifle while jumping and not get your shit fucked.
Almost all the glass in the game is breakable
... Why not all of it.
[QUOTE=d00msdaydan;33084791]New game modes, old everything else[/QUOTE]
New campaign
New guns
New modes
New maps
New tools and attachments
Weapon proficiencies
New Perks
I don't even care about CoD but I think it's more innovative than your post.
Jesus before the kill confirm footage I seriously thought this was a parody trailer with only MW2 footage. Unfortunately it wasn't.
Just to take a step of advance, I'm not criticizing CoD because of some bandwagon phenomenon, I hate how and where this franchise is going. I had a lot of fun on previous games (call of duty 2 and modern warfare 1 are still part of the games I pleasantly reinstall and play again for shits and giggles), but this is taking it too far - nothing new, nothing fixed, nothing changed in the slightest - same multiplayer, same aging graphic engine, etc.
I can already some blind sheep saying "If you don't like it just don't buy it". This is a fool's argument - it might be okay in some cases like a new franchise or something fresh made out of something old, but it's certainly not a valuable argument in THAT case. This franchise is gravely damaging the entire videogame industry - tons and tons or people buy this piece of rehashed crap instead of games that are worth it, Activision is encouraged to force its dev teams to do more stupid overused sequels, and way too much dev teams follow the idea on their own, or forced by their respective editors who jump in the band wagon as well.
This series is threatening and damaging. Don't be surprised about all that DLC bullshit if people keep buying the same old crap made again and again at 70€ each. Capcom released THREE versions of Street Fighter IV and guess what ? The price kept going down and down, and each version was far from being a necessity if you already had a previous one. Is it the same case here ? NO. IT'S FREAKING NOT. Activision keeps on publishing 70€ games, offer NO SUPPORT for the previous titles (aka fucktons of hacking and other shit like that on previous games) and pollute their own franchise with tons and tons of useless DLCs they could either include for free in the original game (maps from the previous games ? fuck you activision, ubisoft did that for free in splinter cell !) or give for free later on. Even selling them 3 bucks would be more fair than the 15 dollars. And once again, if I don't like it, FUCK NO I won't buy it, but I sure won't stop complaining, because that shit is a huge threat against the videogame industry as well because of all the kids who ask their moms and dads 15 bucks to buy three maps and give Activision money they don't fucking deserve.
God I hate this franchise.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;33090026]New campaign
New guns
New modes
New maps
New tools and attachments
Weapon proficiencies
New Perks
I don't even care about CoD but I think it's more innovative than your post.[/QUOTE]
Alright, How about this. A rotting corpse has more innovation than CoD, At least the corpse changes every year.
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;33090273]Text here[/QUOTE]
More eloquent than what I said but that's pretty much the point.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;33090026]New campaign
New guns
New modes
New maps
New tools and attachments
Weapon proficiencies
New Perks
I don't even care about CoD but I think it's more innovative than your post.[/QUOTE]
Bitch please.
Guns => Yeah basically new models that take two hours to model and have no differences of gameplay at all.
Modes => Yeah right, two game modes, worth 70€.
Maps => That could be implemented FOR FREE in a previous game for what it adds.
Tools and Attachments => oh you mean more unbalanced killstreak shit and tons of useless tactic00l crap that have no effect whatsoever ?
Weapon Proficiencies => I don't know what this is but it sure isn't worth an entirely new game as well.
Perks => More game-breaking unbalanced exploit-allowing abilities you mean ?
All of these changes, even combined, aren't worth 70€ because these are easy additions you could add to an already existing games. It's not like the title had any graphical upgrade (in terms of graphics CoD had reached its full potential with MW1, and it never got prettier since then, and it was 4 years ago), any major gameplay change of in overall any possible new concept that needs a game on its own instead of a simple add-on.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.