I live in a college town and during the summer when the college is out, it is hard as fuck to find bud. Well, it's not necessarily hard, but when you do find it, it's some bullshit dealer trying to push high mids (or if you're lucky some fire) for $25/g.. Fuck this place.
[editline]8th June 2012[/editline]
Bump nonetheless
My life is so boring without weed
[QUOTE=JakeIsWin;36252190]I live in a college town and during the summer when the college is out, it is hard as fuck to find bud. Well, it's not necessarily hard, but when you do find it, it's some bullshit dealer trying to push high mids (or if you're lucky some fire) for $25/g.. Fuck this place.
[editline]8th June 2012[/editline]
Bump nonetheless[/QUOTE]
If somebody told me 25/g I would literally tell them to suck my dick for 25 bucks
There is much beauty in this world, like the product of empathy being projected on the feeling of appreciating appreciation, or having found yourself in a complete state of intoxication where appreciation establishes itself as secondary to common sense. Which by now is a haunting memory of perceiving regret. This blurred feeling of unconditional love as defined by the laws of delusional perception of ones own emotions. Now if you excuse me I have to pass out on the couch by seeming tradition followed by pounding headache and nausea.
For over 6000 years alcohol have been used by purpose of recreation. If humanity in the future will be asked by artificial or alien life what our defining moment of intellectual evolution was, I highly recommend leaving that part out.
Bump, got some sticky icky today, haven't had sticky weed for a while ;3
finally got my computer running again
in the mean time i was smoking wax
lots and lots of wax
[QUOTE=Memnoth;36252642]There is much beauty in this world, like the product of empathy being projected on the feeling of appreciating appreciation, or having found yourself in a complete state of intoxication where appreciation establishes itself as secondary to common sense. Which by now is a haunting memory of perceiving regret. This blurred feeling of unconditional love as defined by the laws of delusional perception of ones own emotions. Now if you excuse me I have to pass out on the couch by seeming tradition followed by pounding headache and nausea.
For over 6000 years alcohol have been used by purpose of recreation. If humanity in the future will be asked by artificial or alien life what our defining moment of intellectual evolution was, I highly recommend leaving that part out.[/QUOTE]
Why, alcohol has contributed to a lot of cool stuff as well as bad, but thats like a lot of things
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36252886]Why, alcohol has contributed to a lot of cool stuff as well as bad, but thats like a lot of things[/QUOTE]
Well, if the hypothetical response to such a question is "We started drinking 6000 years ago, we are yet to invent a functioning rehab.", I don't think it would give the impression of a promoting pragmatic thinking.
There are functioning rehabs but none can be 100 percent effective because it is really down to the person.
Heres a thought, we are 1 percent different to chimpanzees right so imagine if there are aliens that are 1 percent different to us in the way we are 1 percent different to chimpanzees. Do you think they would even want to talk to us?
I got weed again yesterday. I'm off to smoke a bowl.
Bumo.
[QUOTE=-z-e-m-i-;36253324]Bumo.[/QUOTE]
where you at, bro?
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36253150]There are functioning rehabs but none can be 100 percent effective because it is really down to the person.
Heres a thought, we are 1 percent different to chimpanzees right so imagine if there are aliens that are 1 percent different to us in the way we are 1 percent different to chimpanzees. Do you think they would even want to talk to us?[/QUOTE]
If we ignore the fact of raw-quoting Neil Degrasse Tyson, I would think that one percentage is relevant to anatomy regarding our looks rather than complete brain involvement.
The person, is by law of its own genetics bound to adhere the rules of human cognitive functioning. The efficiency of the current rehabilitation centers are therefore consistent with the modern understanding of human psychology rather than cognitive neuropsychiatric blueprints of the human genome. We know cognition follows the laws of DNA, since it is neurochemically understood that it affects very specific areas of the human brain concerning catecholamines and monoamines.
If we imagine computers to be a new emerging species of life, taking its innate ability to conquer problems of arithmetic by nature into consideration. We would now have a whole new form of life, with 100% as a differential parameter regarding the comparison between its and our DNA, since it does not even evolve by the means of DNA. Thus, answering your question, which was composed of an inquiry whether a complete different species would be so different by a simple one percentage, even by the standards of establishing a communicative basis with humanity.
but computers are not life and can only do what we tell them to do, I'm not quite sure I follow your analogy. I would think the one percent is relevant to brain involvement as well as anatomy because if it wasn't wouldn't we have the intelligance of a chimpanzee?
Cognition does follow the laws of DNA however every human can be unpredictable as we do have concious thought and I think it is mathematically proven that we will never be able to predict 100 percent correctly all the time what a person will do even if we have all the information.
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36253572]but computers are not life and can only do what we tell them to do, I'm not quite sure I follow your analogy. I would think the one percent is relevant to brain involvement as well as anatomy because if it wasn't wouldn't we have the intelligance of a chimpanzee?
Cognition does follow the laws of DNA however every human can be unpredictable as we do have concious thought and I think it is mathematically proven that we will never be able to predict 100 percent correctly all the time what a person will do even if we have all the information.[/QUOTE]
If you are so quick to disapprove the application of the term life, how would you justify yourself to be considered alive? Is it the because you are carbon-based? If you are referring to your ability to coherently throw back memorized sounds simulated by your recognition of muscular tension in your vocal chords controlled by simple nerve connections in wernicke's area of the brain, I could tell you that you are safe to assume that you are a product of your environment, nothing else. Computers are also a product of their environment; namely humans.
As humans are completely governed by their cognition to control their actions, and as it is often referred to as the conscious experience, and since cognition is governed by the laws of neurochemical data, which is governed by the laws of biology, which is governed by the laws of physics, it then seems to boil down to mathematics. If there is one thing we know about mathematics, it is that it computes, and right now the computing is governed by the laws of the universe, leaving no remarkable difference between the human brain, and a computer. Leaving both of them, 100% predictable with enough data to compute.
The biggest difference between us and chimpanzees is our ability to control our vocal chords, which developed from the need to be able to control our breathing in water, is the ability to memorize sounds as data rather than the constant understanding of the spatial visual surroundings that the brains of apes are constantly reflecting.
[QUOTE=Memnoth;36253865]If you are so quick to disapprove the application of the term life, how would you justify yourself to be considered alive? Is it the because you are carbon-based? If you are referring to your ability to coherently throw back memorized sounds simulated by your recognition of muscular tension in your vocal chords controlled by simple nerve connections in wernicke's area of the brain, I could tell you that you are safe to assume that you are a product of your environment, nothing else. Computers are also a product of their environment; namely humans.
As humans are completely governed by their cognition to control their actions, and as it is often referred to as the conscious experience, and since cognition is governed by the laws of neurochemical data, which is governed by the laws of biology, which is governed by the laws of physics, it then seems to boil down to mathematics. If there is one thing we know about mathematics, it is that it computes, and right now the computing is governed by the laws of the universe, leaving no remarkable difference between the human brain, and a computer. Leaving both of them, 100% predictable with enough data to compute.
The biggest difference between us and chimpanzees is our ability to control our vocal chords, which developed from the need to be able to control our breathing in water, is the ability to memorize sounds as data rather than the constant understanding of the spatial visual surroundings that the brains of apes are constantly reflecting.[/QUOTE]
I agree that we are a product of our enviroment, but I would say that life is something that replicates itsself and can evolve. I mean this is the definition for life: "[I]The condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death[/I]"
No we are not both 100 percent predictable with enough data unless you include the thoughts a person has and thats only because people think of what they will do before they do it/ And there is a remarkable difference between a brain and a computer, a computer will only do what it is told to do, a human may have biological "Programming" but they still do what it wants to do, also the human brain can figure out new ways to do things and can learn and adapt by itself while a computer would require a human to change it.
Another big difference between us and apes is that we can learn more complex tasks. Im pretty sure apes memorize sounds as data as they make sounds that mean things so therefore they would be remembering those sounds.
So my dealer says he only has hash. Whats it like smoking hash?
[QUOTE=Potato-Pugilist;36254106]So my dealer says he only has hash. Whats it like smoking hash?[/QUOTE]
it's great, but you have to mix it with tobacco.
[QUOTE=Potato-Pugilist;36254106]So my dealer says he only has hash. Whats it like smoking hash?[/QUOTE]
Makes you a retardo in the long run.
[QUOTE=/B/rother;36254120]it's great, but you have to mix it with tobacco.[/QUOTE]
That sucks
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36254265]That sucks[/QUOTE]
it doesn't matter if you already smoke cigarettes.
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36253965]I agree that we are a product of our enviroment, but I would say that life is something that replicates itsself and can evolve. I mean this is the definition for life: "[I]The condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death[/I]"
No we are not both 100 percent predictable with enough data unless you include the thoughts a person has and thats only because people think of what they will do before they do it/ And there is a remarkable difference between a brain and a computer, a computer will only do what it is told to do, a human may have biological "Programming" but they still do what it wants to do, also the human brain can figure out new ways to do things and can learn and adapt by itself while a computer would require a human to change it.[/QUOTE]
I wish you'd have showered me with inquiries when I was tweaked on amphetamines rather than hammered.
Everything you have described here, is different manifestations of reality. Since our modern existence involves regular maintenance and construction of computers, it exists as a form of symbiotic life in the same way that we are being manufactured and altered by the laws of evolution and its environment. For example, you didn't apply a divine intervention by quoting another person's interpretation of life. You resorted to display a consensus of establishment rather than applying your own, probably thinking that I would be left in a state of vicissitude in conundrum of contemplation. You went from environment, to process of thought.
The process of thought is easily measurable through (but not limited to) medical devices of imaging, displaying where catecholamines and monoamines are creating electrical substance at the time of thought. This leaves me confused by your self contradicting statement that includes the definition of a current state to be considered thinking, yet not measurable.
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36253965]Another big difference between us and apes is that we can learn more complex tasks. Im pretty sure apes memorize sounds as data as they make sounds that mean things so therefore they would be remembering those sounds.[/QUOTE]
My statement does neither contradict nor substitute this by all laws of semantic natural language, it rather displays an addition of premise to be transcending this crude and simple understanding of chimpanzees, yet I am here to see it fail at textual delivery. Nevertheless, complexity is its foundation in diversity by axiom, making its own tautology of point in the function of deliverance.
well, you don't really [I]have to[/I], but it's just the easiest way.
if you've got a really fine screen in piece, then you might be able to smoke it without adding tobacco, but you will probably end up wasting a little bit of it.
[editline]9th June 2012[/editline]
> automerge
[QUOTE=Memnoth;36254285]I wish you'd have showered me with inquiries when I was tweaked on amphetamines rather than hammered.
Everything you have described here, is different manifestations of reality. Since our modern existence involves regular maintenance and construction of computers, it exists as a form of symbiotic life in the same way that we are being manufactured and altered by the laws of evolution and its environment. For example, you didn't apply a divine intervention by quoting another person's interpretation of life. You resorted to display a consensus of establishment rather than applying your own, probably thinking that I would be left in a state of vicissitude in conundrum of contemplation. You went from environment, to process of thought.
The process of thought is easily measurable through (but not limited to) medical devices of imaging, displaying where catecholamines and monoamines are creating electrical substance at the time of thought. This leaves me confused by your self contradicting statement that includes the definition of a current state to be considered thinking, yet not measurable.
My statement does neither contradict nor substitute this by all laws of semantic natural language, it rather displays an addition of premise to be transcending this crude and simple understanding of chimpanzees, yet I am here to see it fail at textual delivery. Nevertheless, complexity is its foundation in diversity by axiom, making its own tautology of point in the function of deliverance.[/QUOTE]
Actually the definition of life I said I had thought up while discussing with my friend while high and it just so happened that the official definetion fitted in with my definition. And I did not say it thinking you would be left in a conundrum of contemplation I said it because you kinda implied that you thought my definition of life was something different to what I actually thought it was.
The process of thought may be measurable but what I was meaning is its not measurable in the way where we can accurately say what the person is thinking.
[QUOTE=Potato-Pugilist;36254106]So my dealer says he only has hash. Whats it like smoking hash?[/QUOTE]
Hash can be a pretty awesome experience, if smoked right. My preferred way of dealing with chunks of hash is to use a razor blade to halve each piece several times before depositing it in the pipe.
Rather than torching the hash with the lighter, I find the most effective and efficient way of smoking is to hold it above and try to draw the flame down to where it is close enough that the hash starts to boil and produce vapor and smoke. I'd recommend getting something you can cover/seal the bowl with so you can put it out when it's still burning after you hit.
I wish I had some hash... never even seen it before.
...in person.
[QUOTE=zach1193;36254478]I wish I had some hash... never even seen it before.[/QUOTE]
you're not missing out on much tbh
[QUOTE=/B/rother;36254281]it doesn't matter if you already smoke cigarettes.[/QUOTE]
I smoke ciggarettes sometimes and like the taste but they ruin the taste of weed
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36254329]Actually the definition of life I said I had thought up while discussing with my friend while high and it just so happened that the official definetion fitted in with my definition. And I did not say it thinking you would be left in a conundrum of contemplation I said it because you kinda implied that you thought my definition of life was something different to what I actually thought it was.
The process of thought may be measurable but what I was meaning is its not measurable in the way where we can accurately say what the person is thinking.[/QUOTE]
Quotation marks implies an indication of, well, quotation. Therefore I could not reach any other conclusion.
Patterns of thought is merely electrical signals stimulating parts of the brain that has been established in cognition by neuroplasticity in the function of associated emotions by the act of sleeping. This establishes the data as spatial patterns of configuration that would fall within the definition of empirical parameters of measurable notations. Therefore the implication of my statement would encase within both process of thought and current flow of subjective experience, since the electrical data at hand would provide the variables to set the calculations of past, present and the future.
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36254505]I smoke ciggarettes sometimes and like the taste but they ruin the taste of weed[/QUOTE]
meh, i don't really care too much.
if i get some really good pot, it's a whole different thing though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
