Fuck a new Jurassic Flop, the new Star Wars trailer is out soon!
[QUOTE=Bbarnes005;46576079]I bet the hybrid is going to be some kind of Raptor-T-Rex Hybrid.[/QUOTE]
I bet it'll be a T-Rex/Chameleon kind of hybrid.
The Lost World book had a type of dinosaur in it that could do that. It was a massive shame they didn't use it in the movie.
[url]http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/Carnotaurus[/url]
[QUOTE=V12US;46593114]I bet it'll be a T-Rex/Chameleon kind of hybrid.
The Lost World book had a type of dinosaur in it that could do that. It was a massive shame they didn't use it in the movie.
[url]http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/Carnotaurus[/url][/QUOTE]
It's a T-Rex, Velociraptor, Cuttlefish mashup.
what? this looks terrible
[QUOTE=Antimuffin;46592198]What the fuck. This would be the worst. This is exactly what most people hate about trailers nowadays. They show off too much. Trailers only need to spark some interest for the movie. If the movie shows the best bits, then there is no reason to see the movie.[/QUOTE]
Literally right after the sentence you decided to put highlights on
[QUOTE=Coyoteze;46591729][B]Not necessarily all the best scenes[/B] but if a movie is very CG heavy then [B]they should show how good the CG looks.[/B][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Rocko's;46593151]It's a T-Rex, Velociraptor, Cuttlefish mashup.[/QUOTE]
Called the Diablo-Rex.
[QUOTE=Antimuffin;46591458]JW restarts the franchise as the start for a new trilogy. It makes sense to not call it Jurassic Park 4.[/QUOTE]
Oh wow, I missed the news that they'd make another trilogy out of it. I'm not complaining.
I think it's lost some of the feeling from the original by making it all modern. The original was more of a dinosaur safari, this is a themepark. The part with the boat and the other part with the truck driving alongside all the dinosaurs reminded me of the originals and felt similar, but things like the gyrosphere and the monorail make it seem too futuristic to fit in with the others. I know it takes place several years later and it's a different company but i just prefer the style of the original park.
Just based off this trailer, the new company seems to be even dumber than InGen was. The original park failed completely, so they make the same thing again but on an even bigger scale and then decide to make weaponized dinosaurs on the same island as their park. At least the original park failed because someone purposely caused that, along with a storm causing problems; it didn't fail just because they didn't think things through properly.
Neither of those are going to stop me from watching it though, it still looks good.
[QUOTE=nightlord;46599781]I think it's lost some of the feeling from the original by making it all modern. The original was more of a dinosaur safari, this is a themepark. The part with the boat and the other part with the truck driving alongside all the dinosaurs reminded me of the originals and felt similar, but things like the gyrosphere and the monorail make it seem too futuristic to fit in with the others. I know it takes place several years later and it's a different company but i just prefer the style of the original park.
Just based off this trailer, the new company seems to be even dumber than InGen was. The original park failed completely, so they make the same thing again but on an even bigger scale and then decide to make weaponized dinosaurs on the same island as their park. At least the original park failed because someone purposely caused that, along with a storm causing problems; it didn't fail just because they didn't think things through properly.
[/QUOTE]
Not exactly. The original also tried to be some sort of themepark, but it just never finished. This is not trying to be Jurassic Park 1 all over again. This park has the highest security-standards that are possible. It's all about the safety that Masrani is giving to the people. [I]Especially [/I]after the incidents of JP1 and Lost World. It just makes sense to have everything up-to-date. Stuff like the gyrosphere are continous developments of the parks original stuff. This time it's not a car, but a 360-degree sphere that runs on rails. That's exactly one of the main reasons why the original park failed. It only had like 3 persons looking over a 15 km big park and one of them was corrupt. Hammond saved at the wrong stuff: Security. This time there will be a human antagonist as well and I fail to see where the "weaponized" dinosaurs are.
The new company isn't dumber than InGen. InGen didn't want to invest into safe systems for the visitors. And they only create the new dinosaur because they have a decline in visitors numbers.
Some stuff was really, really dumb in the original:
- InGen breeds a dinosaur (dilophosaur) that is able to spit venom and the only thing that is between it and the visitors is a electricity fence.
- Only 3 people looking for the security, only one hunter, on an island full of dinosaurs
- InGen being stingy, although they have millions to use
- The way to the emergency generator leads exactly past the raptor-fence, which doesn't work anymore when the power goes off
- If the raptors are so highly dangerous, why didn't their cage have a seperate generator and why was it possible to cut it externally?
[QUOTE=Antimuffin;46591458]
JW restarts the franchise as the start for a new trilogy. It makes sense to not call it Jurassic Park 4.[/QUOTE]
This is the start of a trilogy? I wonder if we'll see an even more broken down Site B.
Maybe the park rangers should be armed with assault rifles, high caliber shot guns and machine guns to deal with the dinosaurs. Seriously, these animals are already extinct. There is no harm bringing in super powerful firearms to put down these cloned animals into extinction again anyways.
[QUOTE=Antimuffin;46605519]Not exactly. The original also tried to be some sort of themepark, but it just never finished. This is not trying to be Jurassic Park 1 all over again. This park has the highest security-standards that are possible. It's all about the safety that Masrani is giving to the people. [I]Especially [/I]after the incidents of JP1 and Lost World. It just makes sense to have everything up-to-date. Stuff like the gyrosphere are continous developments of the parks original stuff. This time it's not a car, but a 360-degree sphere that runs on rails. That's exactly one of the main reasons why the original park failed. It only had like 3 persons looking over a 15 km big park and one of them was corrupt. Hammond saved at the wrong stuff: Security. This time there will be a human antagonist as well and I fail to see where the "weaponized" dinosaurs are.
The new company isn't dumber than InGen. InGen didn't want to invest into safe systems for the visitors. And they only create the new dinosaur because they have a decline in visitors numbers.
Some stuff was really, really dumb in the original:
- InGen breeds a dinosaur (dilophosaur) that is able to spit venom and the only thing that is between it and the visitors is a electricity fence.
- Only 3 people looking for the security, only one hunter, on an island full of dinosaurs
- InGen being stingy, although they have millions to use
- The way to the emergency generator leads exactly past the raptor-fence, which doesn't work anymore when the power goes off
- If the raptors are so highly dangerous, why didn't their cage have a seperate generator and why was it possible to cut it externally?[/QUOTE]
It's been a while since i've seen the original movie but none of that sounds quite true to me. The original wasn't a themepark, it was a dinosaur safari. Hammond even calls it a "kind of wildlife preserve", and he also says he "Spared no expense". I'm not saying it doesn't make sense to have everything up to date, but it's still lost the feel of the originals; they didn't have to make everything futuristic. They have stuff like the gyrosphere but then they are using trucks as well, so it's not even consistent. The original park only had so few people there because of the storm, it wasn't fully staffed at that point because they sent everyone to safety until the storm ended. We even see a large amount of armed security guards in the original movie, at the start with Muldoon putting a new Raptor in the pen. They didn't save on security at all.
The trailer makes it clear that the new genetic hybrid is a dinosaur they have made to be as deadly and dangerous as possible; a weaponized dinosaur.
InGen had armed guards (normally), cameras, electrified security fences, concrete walls and large drops to stop the dinosaurs escaping, as well as a underground emergency bunker filled with guns. There wasn't really much else they could of had. Nedry shut down everything and made it so they couldn't get it working again, he didn't just turn the power off.
[QUOTE=Antimuffin;46605519]Not exactly. The original also tried to be some sort of themepark, but it just never finished. This is not trying to be Jurassic Park 1 all over again. This park has the highest security-standards that are possible. It's all about the safety that Masrani is giving to the people. [I]Especially [/I]after the incidents of JP1 and Lost World. It just makes sense to have everything up-to-date. Stuff like the gyrosphere are continous developments of the parks original stuff. This time it's not a car, but a 360-degree sphere that runs on rails. That's exactly one of the main reasons why the original park failed. It only had like 3 persons looking over a 15 km big park and one of them was corrupt. Hammond saved at the wrong stuff: Security. This time there will be a human antagonist as well and I fail to see where the "weaponized" dinosaurs are.
The new company isn't dumber than InGen. InGen didn't want to invest into safe systems for the visitors. And they only create the new dinosaur because they have a decline in visitors numbers.
Some stuff was really, really dumb in the original:
- InGen breeds a dinosaur (dilophosaur) that is able to spit venom and the only thing that is between it and the visitors is a electricity fence.
- Only 3 people looking for the security, only one hunter, on an island full of dinosaurs
- InGen being stingy, although they have millions to use
- The way to the emergency generator leads exactly past the raptor-fence, which doesn't work anymore when the power goes off
- If the raptors are so highly dangerous, why didn't their cage have a seperate generator and why was it possible to cut it externally?[/QUOTE]
But they spared no expense
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
