• Should we allow the weird porn threads (IE: "What turns you on" type threads with furry/vore/beastia
    6,070 replies, posted
[QUOTE=bobsynergy;46254563]And the sick part is because they all group up together they think it's normal, examples: Furry shaming, relating to real life persecution, "normies" ffs guys this is embarrassing that we even have to debate why its wrong to show the world what you jerk off to.[/QUOTE] THIS There's no discussion needed, ban the threads, it's obvious what the consensus is by now.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254550]You? I replied but I didn't get a reply back, so you aren't giving yourself any reason at all by ignoring them.[/QUOTE] You're unwilling to accept an alternative viewpoint, so I'd only be wasting my time? But since you insist, anthropomorphism takes MANY forms. Some are sexual, most are not. Many furries don't even like furry porn! So saying it's all just animal fucking is so off-base I can't even properly respond without rigorously educating you on the subject.
Also, all the mods voted 'no'. That says something.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254528]Good job, I'm saying furry is about animal fucking and nobody has proved otherwise, so you can KEEP going on about complaining like little fucking dramaqueens, it won't do anything.[/QUOTE] You're just proving his point that you're being irrational.
[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;46254582]Well, I don't know how to put it in any other way than simply, well, no. Liking furry stuff doesn't mean you like bestiality. It's just, well, wrong. And I know that's absolutely unhelpful and you can totally be like "wow so just 'nope' great argument huh", and you'd be right, but I well and truly can't think of anything more to say because it's just blatantly false it's like someone saying the sky is green, it's just like, well, no maybe I would have more to say on it but honestly I've never seen anyone actually think this since like 2007[/QUOTE] Furries are "anthropomorphic" animals. Furryism shit is about animals, regardless whether it's anthropofuckingmorphic or not. YES, it's about bestiality.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254589]THIS There's no discussion needed, ban the threads, it's obvious what the consensus is by now.[/QUOTE] Consensus is when everyone consents to the decision. %45.54 don't consent. This is not a consensus, by definition??? [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making[/url]
[QUOTE=F T;46254596]Also, all the mods voted 'no'. That says something.[/QUOTE] I personally don't give a shit what the mods voted; a vote is just a vote. Doesn't matter from whom, like how garry voted yes. Doesn't mean jack shit.
fucking dogfuckers [highlight](User was banned for this post ("flaming/why reply" - Orkel))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254528]Good job, I'm saying furry is about animal fucking and nobody has proved otherwise, so you can KEEP going on about complaining like little fucking dramaqueens, it won't do anything.[/QUOTE] Furries in my opinion, stem from a want to fuck exotic things, or a want to snuggle with something fluffy, or find the idea appealing. While wanting to fuck anthropomorphic animals kind of is a want to fuck animals, it's not entirely a want to fuck animals due to the fact that anthropromorphic animals have mostly HUMAN QUALITIES. Actually, this could also mean that furries want really soft and hairy humans with animal like ears.
I don't see the harm from keeping it. Don't like it don't view it.
Alright; so the general consensus is that weird porn shit should go, but it's causing all this bullshit because the people associated with weird porn threads think porn on FP should go away completely if weird porn is going to be taken out? and also debating what is or isn't dogfucking, I guess?
Why can't you people just be normal and say "HEY, normal people don't want to see what turns me on/what animal/what anime I jack off too, so I'm going to go do it at a different website and keep it separate from somewhere where it's not wanted and not be proud of wanting to fuck a shark and have a normal avatar to represent me" Nope instead we cry furry shaming.....
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254603]Furries are "anthropomorphic" animals. Furryism shit is about animals, regardless whether it's anthropofuckingmorphic or not. YES, it's about bestiality.[/QUOTE] I [I]seriously[/I] can't think of anything to say to this, but I'll try anyway. That weird slippery slope shit you have going on there is just wrong because the real, actual fact is that most furries have no desire to fuck an actual animal. It's as plain as that.
I'm not swinging one way or the other but as long as the guidelines are set in the op enforced and those guidelines are approved by a moderator I don't really see why porn threads need to leave. If that's the case they could always add a porn section or something.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254609]fucking dogfuckers[/QUOTE] This isn't even a post, is it. Like, really. I don't particularly like furries either, mate, but you're just being crazy.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254603]Furries are "anthropomorphic" animals. Furryism shit is about animals, regardless whether it's anthropofuckingmorphic or not. YES, it's about bestiality.[/QUOTE] You'd think if they wanted to watch dogs getting fucked then they would watch dogs getting fucked right?
Y'know, I'm kind of wondering if Gwoodman isn't just Innerfire posting from some other dimension. Same terminology, same consistently blisteringly pissed off vibe from his posts, same constant insulting.
[QUOTE=Galen;46254621]I don't see the harm from keeping it. Don't like it don't view it.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=F T;46253835]Still, the whole 'don't look at it if you don't like it' is perhaps the most lamest, most cheapest, most pointless reason to justify keeping it up[/QUOTE] Must I do this everytime someone says this?
I think it's better to just allow the weird porn shit, but just have a secret subforum for the threads for registered 18+ members only, if it should come to that.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;46254650]Y'know, I'm kind of wondering if Gwoodman isn't just Innerfire posting from some other dimension. Same terminology, same consistently blisteringly pissed off vibe from his posts, same constant insulting.[/QUOTE] The key difference is that Innerfire constantly shouts and accuses people of being pedophiles, and Gwoodman constantly shouts and accuses people of being zoophiliacs
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;46254650]Y'know, I'm kind of wondering if Gwoodman isn't just Innerfire posting from some other dimension. Same terminology, same consistently blisteringly pissed off vibe from his posts, same constant insulting.[/QUOTE] He wasnt this bad a few pages ago. I think innerfire hacked his account when he got banned.
there were these times where no one expected pedos and zoophiles to roam the forum and them JWJ happened and then kids started masturbating with adults on webcams don't tell me that shit
[QUOTE=F T;46254596]Also, all the mods voted 'no'. That says something.[/QUOTE] Dai didn't want to vote no, he only did it because he didn't want to lose the little respect he had among the moderators, now he lost his respect among the dogfuckers because he voted No. [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("alt" - Orkel))[/highlight]
Imagine defending a thread that houses zoophiles and pedophiles into the forum
[QUOTE=F T;46254596]Also, all the mods voted 'no'. That says something.[/QUOTE] 11:46 PM - postal: yeah it means we don't want to be the furry porn police on a fucking video game forum
[QUOTE=Anita;46254667]snop[/QUOTE] wheres this info coming from
[QUOTE=Anita;46254667]snip[/QUOTE] Gee, I wonder who this is.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254671]Imagine defending a thread that houses zoophiles and pedophiles into the forum[/QUOTE] Imagine actually thinking you're constantly surrounded by a horde of zoophiles and pedophiles
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46254664] and then kids started masturbating with adults on webcams [/QUOTE] What the christ, that actually happened?
Well here we are. 100 pages in less than 24 hours. I feel like this should enter the Guinness World Records. If it weren't about fucking fetish porn perhaps.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.