Should we allow the weird porn threads (IE: "What turns you on" type threads with furry/vore/beastia - General - Facepunch Forum

Should we allow the weird porn threads (IE: "What turns you on" type threads with furry/vore/beastia

6,070 replies, posted
In This Thread

We already don't allow "underage beastiality" porn anyway, there is certainly some weird shit in the thread but nothing illegal. Besides look at the last few days place is practically sparkling with "normal" porn. If it does go away are we allowed to have a normal furry porn thread? Because that is a lot of the posting in there that wouldn't go elsewhere anyway.

[QUOTE=Dr. Gestapo;46244642]posting thinly veiled drawn child porn and bestiality sounds like a pretty good reason to me y'know, considering it's illegal in several countries[/QUOTE] Well, I wasn't necessarily talking about that kind of stuff. That I understand.

[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;46244646]the issue isn't with furries. you can be a furry i dont give a fuck. you can have an avatar of an unsexualised anthropomorphic animal. i dont care just get the fucking porn off this site[/QUOTE] This is the most sensible way to go about it. If it's SFW, it doesn't matter.

[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;46244646]the issue isn't with furries. you can be a furry i dont give a fuck. you can have an avatar of an unsexualised anthropomorphic animal. i dont care just get the fucking porn off this site[/QUOTE] You didn't even read what I responded to did you?

[QUOTE=Manibogi;46244469]And people get pretty serious about attacking others over what they do privately in their bedrooms without harming anyone a.k.a what they jack off to, lol.[/QUOTE] We're not attacking anyone we just don't think this is an appropriate place to be posting weird stuff to fap to.

[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;46244624]i use facepunch to get my world news. sometimes i will briefly look at the world news through facepunch on, say, my lunchbreak. oh a new ebola scare, lets read up on that. hmm interesting. i wonder what the users have to say about this? [img]http://facepunch.com/image.php?u=461038&dateline=1410451183[/img] oh[/QUOTE] why is that avatar even allowed

[QUOTE=bobsynergy;46244626]But even then besides all the disgusting shit, why do you guys feel the need to share it? this isn't like walking with your friends and saying "hey that girl/guy is hot" this is like randomly pulling out your phone and showing everyone the latest porno you watched and that's still weird.[/QUOTE] Because it's avoidable, though. It's one thing to just randomly post porn in normal threads, it's another to have a thread for that porn so that you don't have to see it. If you pulled out your phone with porn on it, that's when thing; if I personally ask you to show me that porn, it's another entirely. I understand being offended by any form of porn, but that doesn't mean that the group who enjoys it HAS to suffer because of it.

[QUOTE=TrafficMan;46244630]I'd say murder is pretty bad but that may just be my personal bias talking[/QUOTE] Hey man that's fair I'm biased against murder too maybe we can go get a hotel room and bias each other

[QUOTE=Talvy;46244628]Why do people feel the need to socialize porn, anyways? It's supposed to be a personal, dirty secret thing.[/QUOTE] The majority rules, everything seems fine if everyone else around you is doing it. Does that make it right though? Hell no.

[QUOTE=Rhenae;46244653]We already don't allow "underage beastiality" porn anyway, there is certainly some weird shit in the thread but nothing illegal. Besides look at the last few days place is practically sparkling with "normal" porn. If it does go away are we allowed to have a normal furry porn thread? Because that is a lot of the posting in there that wouldn't go elsewhere anyway.[/QUOTE] what the fuck is a normal furry porn thread

[QUOTE=Baconator 7;46244627]being pleasured by [url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1256313&p=46221091&viewfull=1#post46221091]old widows who lost their children slaughtering zombies and other human beings, and then actively encouraging that behavior,[/url] is pretty fucked up, too.[/QUOTE] Did you even bother to understand the context of that episode, the people in that area trapped her own people and it was up to her to save them. That in no way relates to people wanting to fuck dogs or fuck children. You're drawing comparisons out of your ass now, you might as well say people who enjoyed Breaking Bad wanted to start cooking and using meth. Nobody is actively jerking off to that shit, you guys are.

Holy shit, democracy on Facepunch?! I thought I wouldn't ever see such a thing.

I don't think they should stay. There are plenty of places online where openly jacking it to anthro-animal cartoon children is acceptable, and I hope Facepunch never becomes one of them.

Dammit, I would've really needed the sleep for tomorrow's presentation. :/

[QUOTE=bepassley;46244660]why is that avatar even allowed[/QUOTE] This I agree with. Ban porn avatars (or in this case, suggestive avatars because that original video is actually of her riding a mechanical bull or something, not actually porn but taken out of context to look like porn).

[QUOTE]43.12%[/QUOTE] disgusting

[QUOTE=Manibogi;46244656]You didn't even read what I responded to did you?[/QUOTE] ok stop being impossible now thank you

[QUOTE=Baconator 7;46244661]Because it's avoidable, though. It's one thing to just randomly post porn in normal threads, it's another to have a thread for that porn so that you don't have to see it. If you pulled out your phone with porn on it, that's when thing; if I personally ask you to show me that porn, it's another entirely. I understand being offended by any form of porn, but that doesn't mean that the group who enjoys it HAS to suffer because of it.[/QUOTE] no one is suffering take it to reddit where you belong

[QUOTE=Baconator 7;46244661]Because it's avoidable, though. It's one thing to just randomly post porn in normal threads, it's another to have a thread for that porn so that you don't have to see it. If you pulled out your phone with porn on it, that's when thing; if I personally ask you to show me that porn, it's another entirely. I understand being offended by any form of porn, but that doesn't mean that the group who enjoys it HAS to suffer because of it.[/QUOTE] Did you just say you suffer when you can't have a thread where you share your dragon-kid double penetration images?

imagine you had a child, would you be fine with them visiting a "what turns you on" thread known to be full of people who post sexual images involving children? is there seriously anyone out there who thinks that's a perfectly ok thing?

[QUOTE=Manibogi;46244656]You didn't even read what I responded to did you?[/QUOTE] there are some people here who are being vocal about having an issue with furries yeh but that isn't what the vote is about and that isn't what the majority of users are about

[QUOTE=Handsome Matt;46244676]avatars like this should be banned, in fact I thought they were? I've seen this guys too much.[/QUOTE] dai mentioned something about a mass PMing of users with NSFW/otherwise suggestive avatars a while back then banning/reverting the avatars of those that didn't comply, but I don't think anything ever came of that. Can we get a vote on that too?

Baconator 7 I think you've forgotten that Facepunch is a business and the forums reflect on that business. If potential investors go on here and see all these porn threads and fucked up shit like furries and loli, you think that's going to look good for Garry and his business? Answer: Fuck no.

[QUOTE=Baconator 7;46244627]being pleasured by [url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1256313&p=46221091&viewfull=1#post46221091]old widows who lost their children slaughtering zombies and other human beings, and then actively encouraging that behavior,[/url] is pretty fucked up, too.[/QUOTE] you are saying that watching television is equivalent to masturbating to child porn. think about this. do it for five minutes. where did you go so wrong that this is what you do when you have internet access.

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46244664]what the fuck is a normal furry porn thread[/QUOTE] What the fuck is a normal porn thread?

[QUOTE=Jimbomcb;46244686]imagine you had a child, would you be fine with them visiting a "what turns you on" thread known to be full of people who post sexual images involving children? is there seriously anyone out there who thinks that's a perfectly ok thing?[/QUOTE] i wouldn't be ok letting a child anywhere near the internet they could visit ANYWHERE

[QUOTE=bepassley;46244660]why is that avatar even allowed[/QUOTE]i thought avatars like this [b]were[/b] banned.

Look, I'm not against banning porn from the site. I wouldn't do it, but if y'all want to then whatever. I only have an issue with it when people start asking to ban safe avatars and start lumping together furries with people who like bestiality/child porn, even if they do so unadvertedly.

[QUOTE=wickedplayer494;46244670]Holy shit, democracy on Facepunch?! I thought I wouldn't ever see such a thing.[/QUOTE] This voting thing was actually garry's idea.

IT IS ILLEGAL TO POSSESS HENTAI / MANGA DRAWINGS DEPICTING SEXUAL ACTS ON CHILDREN UNDER UK LAW [url]http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/section/62[/url] SECTION 62 CORONERS AND JUSTICE ACT 2009 [B]POSSESSION OF PROHIBITED IMAGES OF CHILDREN[/B] (1)IT IS AN OFFENCE FOR A PERSON TO BE IN POSSESSION OF A PROHIBITED IMAGE OF A CHILD. (2)A PROHIBITED IMAGE IS AN IMAGE WHICH— (A)IS PORNOGRAPHIC, (B)FALLS WITHIN SUBSECTION (6), AND (C)IS GROSSLY OFFENSIVE, DISGUSTING OR OTHERWISE OF AN OBSCENE CHARACTER. (3)AN IMAGE IS “PORNOGRAPHIC” IF IT IS OF SUCH A NATURE THAT IT MUST REASONABLY BE ASSUMED TO HAVE BEEN PRODUCED SOLELY OR PRINCIPALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF SEXUAL AROUSAL. (4)WHERE (AS FOUND IN THE PERSON'S POSSESSION) AN IMAGE FORMS PART OF A SERIES OF IMAGES, THE QUESTION WHETHER THE IMAGE IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS IS MENTIONED IN SUBSECTION (3) IS TO BE DETERMINED BY REFERENCE TO— (A)THE IMAGE ITSELF, AND (B)(IF THE SERIES OF IMAGES IS SUCH AS TO BE CAPABLE OF PROVIDING A CONTEXT FOR THE IMAGE) THE CONTEXT IN WHICH IT OCCURS IN THE SERIES OF IMAGES. (5)SO, FOR EXAMPLE, WHERE— (A)AN IMAGE FORMS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A NARRATIVE CONSTITUTED BY A SERIES OF IMAGES, AND (B)HAVING REGARD TO THOSE IMAGES AS A WHOLE, THEY ARE NOT OF SUCH A NATURE THAT THEY MUST REASONABLY BE ASSUMED TO HAVE BEEN PRODUCED SOLELY OR PRINCIPALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF SEXUAL AROUSAL, THE IMAGE MAY, BY VIRTUE OF BEING PART OF THAT NARRATIVE, BE FOUND NOT TO BE PORNOGRAPHIC, EVEN THOUGH IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE PORNOGRAPHIC IF TAKEN BY ITSELF. (6)AN IMAGE FALLS WITHIN THIS SUBSECTION IF IT— (A)IS AN IMAGE WHICH FOCUSES SOLELY OR PRINCIPALLY ON A CHILD'S GENITALS OR ANAL REGION, OR (B)PORTRAYS ANY OF THE ACTS MENTIONED IN SUBSECTION (7). (7)THOSE ACTS ARE— (A)THE PERFORMANCE BY A PERSON OF AN ACT OF INTERCOURSE OR ORAL SEX WITH OR IN THE PRESENCE OF A CHILD; (B)AN ACT OF MASTURBATION BY, OF, INVOLVING OR IN THE PRESENCE OF A CHILD; (C)AN ACT WHICH INVOLVES PENETRATION OF THE VAGINA OR ANUS OF A CHILD WITH A PART OF A PERSON'S BODY OR WITH ANYTHING ELSE; (D)AN ACT OF PENETRATION, IN THE PRESENCE OF A CHILD, OF THE VAGINA OR ANUS OF A PERSON WITH A PART OF A PERSON'S BODY OR WITH ANYTHING ELSE; (E)THE PERFORMANCE BY A CHILD OF AN ACT OF INTERCOURSE OR ORAL SEX WITH AN ANIMAL (WHETHER DEAD OR ALIVE OR IMAGINARY); (F)THE PERFORMANCE BY A PERSON OF AN ACT OF INTERCOURSE OR ORAL SEX WITH AN ANIMAL (WHETHER DEAD OR ALIVE OR IMAGINARY) IN THE PRESENCE OF A CHILD. (8)FOR THE PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION (7), PENETRATION IS A CONTINUING ACT FROM ENTRY TO WITHDRAWAL. (9)PROCEEDINGS FOR AN OFFENCE UNDER SUBSECTION (1) MAY NOT BE INSTITUTED— (A)IN ENGLAND AND WALES, EXCEPT BY OR WITH THE CONSENT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS; (B)IN NORTHERN IRELAND, EXCEPT BY OR WITH THE CONSENT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND.

Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.