• Should we allow the weird porn threads (IE: "What turns you on" type threads with furry/vore/beastia
    6,070 replies, posted
[QUOTE=JPlus;46287543]Uh, we could argue about... um... hmmm, something that facepunch has never argued over, uhhhh...[/QUOTE] Peanut Butter and Jelly vs Peanut Butter and Banana. Which truly is the better quick sandwich??? [only not here]
Or you can just stop posting if you got nothing else to say so if anyone else wants to give any feedback, it won't be lost in a sea of wonderful "I CAN'T THINK OF ANYTHING TO POST LOL" posts??????????????? fucking fast threaders can never stop posting
[QUOTE=For No Reason;46287555]Peanut Butter and Jelly vs Peanut Butter and Banana. Which truly is the better quick sandwich??? [only not here][/QUOTE] Well I think PB & J because blah blah blah no PB & B is clearly better because blah blah blah lol dude you can't assume that just cus you're blah blah blah wow why are you getting so angry about sandwiches blah blah blah [meme or some shit idfk] blah blah blah [one of the users gets banned for flaming/getting real angry/insulting/harassing] There now there's no point in arguing here anymore because I just finished everyone's arguments goodnight everyone EDIT: oops i didn't see your thingy postal yeah the polls look like they're clearly going in favour of no so w/e I'm outta here thanks for having me round guys good luck with the next porn debate in a few weeks if i'm not there
I cant start my day without jerking it to some hot pokemon porn so yes
There are millions of websites dedicated to every god damn sexual niche ever devised. They can go there if they really need to jack it to five slugs having an orgy.
[QUOTE=SexualShark;46289028]There are millions of websites dedicated to every god damn sexual niche ever devised. They can go there if they really need to jack it to five slugs having an orgy they can go there.[/QUOTE] link?
[QUOTE=Midas22;46289072]link?[/QUOTE] [url]www.google.com[/url] have fun let me save you some time and cut a few thousand down for you [url]www.reddit.com[/url]
[url]http://redditlist.com/nsfw[/url] get your pronos here! come and get'em!
[QUOTE=Primigenes;46289212]Someones gonna make a "What Turns You Off" thread as a replacement for "What Turns You On". The cycle will repeat itself[/QUOTE] then i ban everyone in fast threads problem solved world peace declared
[QUOTE=Primigenes;46289212]Someones gonna make a "What Turns You Off" thread as a replacement for "What Turns You On". The cycle will repeat itself[/QUOTE] and they'll be banned it's really that simple
[QUOTE=Primigenes;46289240]Thank you Postal for being the hero we need in times of crisis[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Primigenes;46289240]Thank you Postal[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Primigenes;46289240]Postal[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Primigenes;46289240]P[/QUOTE]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/dXFEs95.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Craptasket;46289278][img]http://i.imgur.com/dXFEs95.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] :v: weed porn?
[QUOTE=Craptasket;46289278][img]http://i.imgur.com/dXFEs95.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] 29 is the best
delete fast threads kill the cancer
Meant to say no, woops I think its an awful idea for a thread and doesn't belong on the site.
[QUOTE=Suttles;46290658]Meant to say no, woops I think its an awful idea for a thread and doesn't belong on the site.[/QUOTE] message craptasket or postal
why ban it? if you dont want to see evil hairy tentacles massacrating someone's genitalia maybe you shouldn't click on that one thread?
[QUOTE=jp_rsardeto;46291455]why ban it? if you dont want to see evil hairy tentacles massacrating someone's genitalia maybe you shouldn't click on that one thread?[/QUOTE] Fucking oath really.
[QUOTE=jp_rsardeto;46291455]why ban it? if you dont want to see evil hairy tentacles massacrating someone's genitalia maybe you shouldn't click on that one thread?[/QUOTE] Because Fast Threads is for questions and dumb shit. Not porn.
[QUOTE=Hezzy;46290164]delete fast threads kill the cancer[/QUOTE] What will this solve?
[QUOTE=Katatonic717;46291607]What will this solve?[/QUOTE] Everything.
I'm impressed that we have 2k active users
[QUOTE=CubeManv2;46291893]I'm impressed that we have 2k active users[/QUOTE] Well not everybody on the forum's voted on the issue for either side, also many of these are sockpuppets/invalidated votes. You can see as such in the thread OP where they have a count of changed and canceled votes.
[QUOTE=CubeManv2;46291893]I'm impressed that we have 2k active users[/QUOTE] 607,272 threads, 27,440,819 posts, 26,564 active members, 2593 online (1495 guests) Most users ever online was 20,777, 4 Weeks Ago at 07:53AM.
[QUOTE=CheeseMan;46291912]607,272 threads, 27,440,819 posts, 26,564 active members, 2593 online (1495 guests) Most users ever online was 20,777, 4 Weeks Ago at 07:53AM.[/QUOTE] yeah its just weird, i see so many of the same people posting every day. But then again if i counted them it'd probably be a large number.
I'm not into the weird porn threads, but I'm not for banning them. Let them have their one little thread or two, not like it's hurting anyone. If you don't want to see it, don't click on it. Simple as that. Kinda odd that so many on FP are for banning something they could just ignore, but have completely opposite views on (similar-ish) issues outside the forum.
[QUOTE=Robman8908;46292049]I'm not into the weird porn threads, but I'm not for banning them. Let them have their one little thread or two, not like it's hurting anyone. If you don't want to see it, don't click on it. Simple as that. Kinda odd that so many on FP are for banning something they could just ignore, but have completely opposite views on (similar-ish) issues outside the forum.[/QUOTE] It's because of the loaded way the question in the headline is phrased. For or against the sort of thread for whatever reason, it's being put in such a way that you'd have to either be an extremist to vote in favor of it (it being "furry/vore/bestiality") or have a solid rational stance that's coherent for why you vote in favor without committing yourself to tacitly approving of Furry, Vore and Bestiality. One of those is considered "okay" by a lot of people, another "weird but harmless? isn't it fantasy?" and a third is explicitly illegal in a lot of countries. In fact if it had been phrased "loli/vore/beastiality" I'm willing to stake all of my hats that the vote would be clear as crystals in favor of banning the porn threads. That and a lot of people are reading it as a bare minimum "kill these particular creepy threads" vote, and I do not think consider the implications. There's no evidence that it would, but there's a plausible case that this should logically extend to all "porny" threads. After all, if we're getting rid of the sick-o's who sit around beating their priests to wild geese, why not also ban the pervs who spend their time "appreciating" catgirls, or the misogynists who spend their time discussing "sexy" women, or the gays who are ogling sexy man meat, or so on and so forth. If this vote included all of those threads, I'm fairly certain there would be a hard vote brigade against deleting anything.
[QUOTE=Primigenes;46289212]Someones gonna make a "What Turns You Off" thread as a replacement for "What Turns You On". The cycle will repeat itself[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=postal;46289222]then i ban everyone in fast threads problem solved world peace declared[/QUOTE] Fuck :v: I was about to do that
[QUOTE=Crazy Ivan;46292101]It's because of the loaded way the question in the headline is phrased. For or against the sort of thread for whatever reason, it's being put in such a way that you'd have to either be an extremist to vote in favor of it (it being "furry/vore/bestiality") or have a solid rational stance that's coherent for why you vote in favor without committing yourself to tacitly approving of Furry, Vore and Bestiality. One of those is considered "okay" by a lot of people, another "weird but harmless? isn't it fantasy?" and a third is explicitly illegal in a lot of countries. In fact if it had been phrased "loli/vore/beastiality" I'm willing to stake all of my hats that the vote would be clear as crystals in favor of banning the porn threads. That and a lot of people are reading it as a bare minimum "kill these particular creepy threads" vote, and I do not think consider the implications. There's no evidence that it would, but there's a plausible case that this should logically extend to all "porny" threads. After all, if we're getting rid of the sick-o's who sit around beating their priests to wild geese, why not also ban the pervs who spend their time "appreciating" catgirls, or the misogynists who spend their time discussing "sexy" women, or the gays who are ogling sexy man meat, or so on and so forth. If this vote included all of those threads, I'm fairly certain there would be a hard vote brigade against deleting anything.[/QUOTE] I see your point. I don't care one way or another just because I never even glance twice at any of those threads, so I just don't see the big deal in it being some gigantic issue people are getting pissy about. Not hard to not get offended by something, just don't care.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.