Should we allow the weird porn threads (IE: "What turns you on" type threads with furry/vore/beastia
6,070 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Robman8908;46292270]I see your point. I don't care one way or another just because I never even glance twice at any of those threads, so I just don't see the big deal in it being some gigantic issue people are getting pissy about.
Not hard to not get offended by something, just don't care.[/QUOTE]
Basically because the threads keep borderline breaking the law despite being given 6 chances so far
snip (this isn't about fast threads)
[QUOTE=No_0ne;46243474]porn threads really don't belong on this site[/QUOTE]
Yeah, They belong on reddit.
[QUOTE=Tomo Takino;46283222]I wouldn't mind text threads popping up. There have been a few of those over the years and they were quite enjoyable because I wasn't looking at enormous pictures of pornography that makes me uncomfortable every minute.[/QUOTE]
I agree, popping a boner makes me feel weird, uncomfortable, AND gross. Ban all boner inducing threads.
[editline]21st October 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=CheeseMan;46291912]607,272 threads, 27,440,819 posts, 26,564 active members, 2593 online (1495 guests)
Most users ever online was 20,777, 4 Weeks Ago at 07:53AM.[/QUOTE]
At least 303000 of those threads are about fucked up porn
[editline]21st October 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Robman8908;46292049]Kinda odd that so many on FP are for banning something they could just ignore, but have completely opposite views on (similar-ish) issues outside the forum.[/QUOTE]
Dear mods,
Please ignore anything that you would normally ban for. Tia.
Signed: Robman8908
[editline]21st October 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Primigenes;46289212]Someones gonna make a "What Turns You Off" thread as a replacement for "What Turns You On". The cycle will repeat itself[/QUOTE]
The first post in that thread will be "child porn" and then a mod like Dai will ban the user that posted it for some bogus reason.
Mods stop protecting pedophiles.
Was going to say "harboring" but I'm not sure if the usage is tight atm 👻 💩 💩 💩
[QUOTE=CheeseMan;46292279]Basically because the threads keep borderline breaking the law despite being given 6 chances so far[/QUOTE]
It's stuff like that that just makes me want to put a huge: "NO GRAY AREA STUFF" sticker on threads like these instead of just erasing them entirely, it would actually protect people who actually legitimately post there (As far and few between they can be.) instead of just turning it into a dump of clearly underage antromorphic animals. Anyone who would try would be permabanned without a second thought.
Granted it means shoving the mods to do a job they clearly don't want to do but when you think about it, that's what they are supposed to do. This entire debacle can simply be fixed with a much stricter set of rules when it comes to lewd threads.
Please don't post about my grey area (my brain)
[QUOTE=SinjinOmega;46293848]Granted it means shoving the mods to do a job they clearly don't want to do but when you think about it, that's what they are supposed to do. This entire debacle can simply be fixed with a much stricter set of rules when it comes to lewd threads.[/QUOTE]
They're supposed to be moderating a whole subforum, not a single thread. That single thread probably takes as much effort to moderate as the whole rest of the forums combined. It's a waste of human resources.
Here's where I have to repeat why getting a thread mod is a bad thing: Get a mod that doesn't like the content, and the job will ultimately suck for them because they would have to sift through porn on a daily basis. Get a mod that likes the content, and then you've got the problem of them being too lenient because they like the thread.
Has it been answered yet why another site with established communities can't be used in place for WTYO users?
I guess I wasn't clear on what I was saying. I didn't say "Get a thread mod". I was trying to say "Be a bit stricter". Sorry if I was a bit too unclear on that.
[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;46293998]
Has it been answered yet why another site with established communities can't be used in place for WTYO users?[/QUOTE]
Because dumbfucks here will go there to shitpost as hard as possible, which will make them get back here (as has happened with that 8chan page).
And before the private steam group gets suggested for the nth time,
[QUOTE=https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=4045-USHJ-3810]Off-Limit Topics/Replies
Do not post any topics/replies containing the following:
Porn, inappropriate or offensive content, warez or leaked content or anything else not safe for work[/QUOTE]
it would take one troll to report all the things and get everyone in trouble.
[QUOTE=SinjinOmega;46294105]I guess I wasn't clear on what I was saying. I didn't say "Get a thread mod". I was trying to say "Be a bit stricter". Sorry if I was a bit too unclear on that.[/QUOTE]
You were clear, but a thread mod is what'll have to happen eventually if the thread is kept open with more rules.
Like two different people said, IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THE DAMN PORN, just DON'T CLICK ON IT
Wow! It's like it doesn't exist!
whats garrys reason for voting yes?
[QUOTE=mokkan;46294486]whats garrys reason for voting yes?[/QUOTE]
He could just be trying to be funny, knowing him.
garry's vote alone is worth 1000 votes gg yes wins end thread
[QUOTE=mokkan;46294486]whats garrys reason for voting yes?[/QUOTE]
Either he loves furry shit, or he's a libertarian. Most of the mods wanted the threads banned a while ago, and garry said to allow them.
[QUOTE=CheeseMan;46291912]607,272 threads, 27,440,819 posts, 26,564 active members, 2593 online (1495 guests)
Most users ever online was 20,777, 4 Weeks Ago at 07:53AM.[/QUOTE]
4 weeks ago, was that when the leaked pics of celebrities happened?
Why don't we just ban those who post anything besides porn or more than 2 images per thread? Instead of punish everyone else.
and I guarantee you half the people who voted no don't even go to the porn thread.
[QUOTE=Galen;46294514]garry's vote alone is worth 1000 votes gg yes wins end thread[/QUOTE]
i was wondering when you'd show up
[QUOTE=Galen;46294227]Like two different people said, IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THE DAMN PORN, just DON'T CLICK ON IT
Wow! It's like it doesn't exist![/QUOTE]
i'd like to change my vote to yes. the last 20 times that this post has been made i shrugged it off, but this time my mind has been changed. thank you Galen for giving me this revelation.
[QUOTE=ThatSprite;46294954]i was wondering when you'd show up[/QUOTE]
i've actually been here for a while ty
I personally think we should get rid of it. My reason for saying this is pretty simple, it's a gaming site with some nice other features. I've always thought the heavily NSFW stuff was incredibly out of place. Just my two cents.
[QUOTE=Galen;46294227]Like two different people said, IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THE DAMN PORN, just DON'T CLICK ON IT
Wow! It's like it doesn't exist![/QUOTE]
It's as if you've completely ignored everything that's been said in this thread
[QUOTE=Coment;46294210]Because dumbfucks here will go there to shitpost as hard as possible, which will make them get back here (as has happened with that 8chan page).
And before the private steam group gets suggested for the nth time,
it would take one troll to report all the things and get everyone in trouble.[/QUOTE]
Are you implying that the steam moderation team is competent enough
some of my friends have been part of furry porn groups since forever and they're still there. One that comes to mind is that german furry porn group someone here made; which I had to deal with because someone was crying about me or something idk
[editline]21st October 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Galen;46294227]Like two different people said, IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THE DAMN PORN, just DON'T CLICK ON IT
Wow! It's like it doesn't exist![/QUOTE]
but it does
because we can see it
[QUOTE=mokkan;46294486]whats garrys reason for voting yes?[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://puu.sh/blzpp.jpg[/IMG]
im wondering what kind of situation would arise that he would need to
Not a single Mod has said yes. Hah.
[QUOTE=Camwi_003;46295977]Not a single Mod has said yes. Hah.[/QUOTE]
garry said yes so it's invalidated
[QUOTE=Galen;46296028]garry said yes so it's invalidated[/QUOTE]
I don't care if this is just a joke, but if you keep posting this, it would be more beneficial if you could just get out.
[QUOTE=Galen;46296028]garry said yes so it's invalidated[/QUOTE]
s t o p
[editline]21st October 2014[/editline]
you are embarrassing
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.