• Should we allow the weird porn threads (IE: "What turns you on" type threads with furry/vore/beastia
    6,070 replies, posted
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46244841]not safe for work do you want your boss or coworkers to see it if you answered no then it's not safe work[/QUOTE] that implies the people in FP porn threads aren't 16 years old and have ever held a job
[QUOTE=Paramud;46244840]nice one, you got me bud[/QUOTE] don't copy me dogfucker
Yeah I don't see why I thought the general populace of Facepunch would see the logic in "normal furry porn" that was silly. This is about just the What turns you on thread though isn't it? It seems most argument here is over porn as a whole, so should there be another vote over porn in general? I mean the porn on here isn't just "what turns you on" theres Hot girls, hot guys, illustrated girls, catgirl thread (sometimes), etc etc?
It's 2am and I hit Yes by accident, can I get it changed to no please postal?
[QUOTE=Spacewolf;46244858]What makes you think that[/QUOTE] idk how you've been acting in this thread? your lazy attitude towards the issue?
[QUOTE=Aredbomb;46244837]Why are people this desperate to save a stupid porn thread on one website?[/QUOTE] I guess it's because they like having a group of people to jerk off with like that's really the only reason they are so defensive it's fucked up.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46244854]Can you give us something that convinces us that child porn and bestiality isn't bad? Reasonable tip: You can't.[/QUOTE] How is everyone suddenly assuming I'm condoning child porn because I said I didn't like when people flame each other instead of a calm argument?
Ban anyone who defends child porn, report them to the authorities, and protect the children. Fetishes are okay, hurting the innocent is not. Grow up you sick fucks.
[QUOTE=Spacewolf;46244826]Lemme get out my telescope to search my post for where I said that cuz I can't see anything like that at all no i'm more referring to the posts going "fuck you" "no fuck you lol" instead of actually debating like non retards[/QUOTE] Don't try to argue with them because with their logic you are a furry because you have 'Wolf' in your nick, which means you want to fuck dogs, and you are also a pedophile posting CP all day in the WTYO thread.
Honestly, this poll shouldn't have been made in the first place. I think it was pretty clear which side has the most supporters
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;46244794]They're both covered. There's nothing NSFW about those. Targetting people when their avatars are sfw. It's hinting sure I'll give you that but there isn't a guideline on nsfw avatars so really you're just pointing something out for nothing :v:[/QUOTE] the left one has a penis and the right one a super huge bulge
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;46244842]Why would you even be on Facepunch on a work computer is beyond me[/QUOTE] Ok heres that argument again. people need to realise that other people don't want to wake up and be greeted by a sparkledog's asshole
[QUOTE=Katatonic717;46244822]I mean yeah it's censored sure, but like lets say you're on break and your boss checks whats happening at your computer and sees that. He aint gonna be happy.[/QUOTE] If anything censoring it just brings more attention to the fact that "hey he's naked lol". And the other one with the loin-cloth, fucking hell. Why are people so adamant about drawing bulges on shit that isn't meant to be pornographic?
guys, look. check this out. we actually exist on a forum where this was not an immediately unanimous decision among everyone involved. not only did there actually need to be a vote held on this, but it's also being heavily disputed. this already went too far before it even began.
The nsfw hot girls/guys threads would be alright if there's no hardcore stuff. I'm not against porn, just that this shouldn't be the website for it, in my opinion.
Can we ban porn avatars BTW? I don't give a shit about the porn threads because they're tucked away in the own place. But porn avatars can potentially be everywhere on the forum.
[QUOTE=Jimbomcb;46244798]i can't tell if you genuinely wouldn't want your kids to use the internet or if this is defending pedo images being posted on a forum primarily consisting of children because the kid could easily find really fucked up things if they tried elsewhere...[/QUOTE] i would seriously not let my kid go online until like, 14 years old. i would also ban pedo images, but nothing else. legal is legal, illegal is illegal. pedoshit is disgusting, and while i also think that most other stuff in threads this'd affect is also disgusting, im sure there's someone there who's ok with it. it's either all or nothing, all porn banned or none of it (outside illegal aka loli pedobait, which should be banbanban) in my honest opinion
[QUOTE=RichyZ;46244848]"its illegal as fuck" "doesnt look good on a business perspective" "ruins the reputation of the forum" "breeding ground for shit creep users" yeah horrible arguments not based in reality at all dog fucker.[/QUOTE] There we go again, you could have pointed out those posts, but instead you call me a dog fucker, thanks.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;46244866]At least it isn't the whole thing. Yeah it's suggestive but what would you rather see. In this example a bird's face on the crotch area or a bird dick.[/QUOTE] i would rather the people of those avatars not have them at all, have something normal like obama smoking weed.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;46244866] Yeah it's suggestive but what would you rather see. In this example a bird's face on the crotch area or a bird dick.[/QUOTE] how about neither u fuckin doofus
God damnit, I accidently voted yes. I wanted to vote no
[QUOTE=PeejsterM;46244847]Censoring something, believe it or not, doesn't make it completely safe for work. Would you show it to your kids? If not, it's most likely not SFW. The first one even purposely pans over to a view of the "censored" crotch. It's being done on purpose, and it's absolutely not safe at all.[/QUOTE] Honestly, if you have to make an avatar censored or cropped to be "sfw", its probably not appropriate for use. I would leave it at that.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;46244866]At least it isn't the whole thing. Yeah it's suggestive but what would you rather see. In this example a bird's face on the crotch area or a bird dick.[/QUOTE] I shouldn't have to see either. If I went outside with nothing but the image of a bird superimposed upon my junk, I would be arrested [i]immediately[/i]. Similar guidelines ought to be applied to avatars.
[QUOTE=Ownederd;46244869]idk how you've been acting in this thread? your lazy attitude towards the issue?[/QUOTE] What?
Thinking about it threads like that have no reason to be on a forum like this, go ahead and change my vote to a no.
[QUOTE=Spacewolf;46244871]How is everyone suddenly assuming I'm condoning child porn because I said I didn't like when people flame each other instead of a calm argument?[/QUOTE] Read the thread from the start then, I know it's hard but make an effort.
I like how half of the arguments here are just people calling eachother "dogfucker" People can't debate about shit like this without resorting to name calling.
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;46244695]Baconator 7 I think you've forgotten that Facepunch is a business and the forums reflect on that business. If potential investors go on here and see all these porn threads and fucked up shit like furries and loli, you think that's going to look good for Garry and his business? Answer: Fuck no.[/QUOTE] just going to rebump this seeing as how fast this thread is going, I hope you yes voters realise what I've said
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/JuSHJ78.gif[/IMG]
OKAY - Fetishes like bondage, fendom, uhh whatever the fuck else fetishes are like feet n shit NOT OKAY AND SHOULD BE BANNED - Faggots who remind you of SA mods AKA rapists, child porn people, sexual assult or anything without consent or breaks MERRICA law.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.