• Should we allow the weird porn threads (IE: "What turns you on" type threads with furry/vore/beastia
    6,070 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Vodkavia;46246907]I like how you can tell these two agree because their exaggerations and lies coincide to crisply. Is blatant shit posting allowed in this thread? Kind of unloading a crate of worms with the minors seeing dick thing though, because how are sex performers supposed to make their content readily available if they have to check every users age, unless it was intentional that's something different.[/QUOTE] what the fuck are you on about 'sex performers'? we're talking about teenage kids showing their dicks off to other teenage kids and grown men, and this is the exact sort of fucking environment that led to that
[QUOTE=Crash155;46246924]Arc Nova is just being a dickhead now[/QUOTE] Well, if you legitimately get your jollies off to images of cartoon/real dogs getting fucked (or fucking you) I don't see a problem with calling someone a dogfucker.
[QUOTE=Manibogi;46246929]Because he's insulting people, derailing the conversation and outright trolling, and nobody's doing a thing even though he was reported multiple times.[/QUOTE] DUDE there is no fucking conversation its a poll and you explain why it is you voted. Calm down I'm just teasin ya nice tiger :)
[QUOTE=Manibogi;46246929]Because he's insulting people, derailing the conversation and outright trolling, and nobody's doing a thing even though he was reported multiple times.[/QUOTE] Then don't be a weirdo. Bam problem solved.
[QUOTE=Wootman;46246913]Why are you getting mad over what people on the internet are saying? Don't be a baby.[/QUOTE] Well I guess we should get rid of the flaming rules then.
Ok, you're gonna make me do this. Searched the artist and found his tumblr. [quote]I'm a furry cub/shota/smut artist, whatever you'd like to call it. I draw rather risqué subjects, so if you don't fancy such things, simply expose yourself to it in large amounts until you're comfortable.[/quote] The tags of the image. [img]http://puu.sh/ce5hP/96c5d1167b.png[/img] [url=https://static1.e621.net/data/sample/0e/34/0e34cbc7cb927d2b24680acb5c2745da.jpg]The image in question, since obviously we're playing the disingenuous game.[/url] And if you're gonna try and spring some expertly set trap that 'that doesn't quantify toddlercon', then don't, because I know it doesn't. It's still fucking cub porn, which is the point.
[QUOTE=CheeseMan;46246908]So in the new FP, posting stuff that is against the rules in the OP of the thread is allowed, but arguing that someone who breaks the rules in a thread should be banned? For a 'witch hunt' no less? What the heck kinda system is this! It's literally defending people who break rules, and we have had no trifles with banning people who 'accidentally' break warez rules, so this is pretty much as close to protecting and condoning this kind of behavior as you can get.[/QUOTE] People in the thread can make a mistake, resulting in someone, in blunt, going, "Hey! Snip that shit quickly or get banned!" resulting in the poster realizing and quickly sweeping their error under the rug while everyone goes, "What happened?" before shortly continuing normal function. Literally everyone is looking out for each other.
[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;46246946]Well, if you legitimately get your jollies off to images of cartoon/real dogs getting fucked (or fucking you) I don't see a problem with calling someone a dogfucker.[/QUOTE] Because he's no longer trying to be constructive, and had instead decided to stick his fingers into his ears and scream until people go away.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46246877]Yeah I have "personal" issues. Are they related to this? No. You were claiming it's related to this. If you truly have personal issues you would understand that you think of the other person less if they pretend to know more about you than you know about yourself. It's an insult in itself. I never meant to imply you have an army. I just thought "friends" would seem less agitating and simpler then "some facepunch furries".[/QUOTE] I ask for you to accept an apology on my behalf but the personal issues i brought up here in regards to you were only brought up because they were painfully relevant to the discussion at hand. Exactly what is taking place here you have brought to other threads including the gay thread, so i'm using what you said in the past in the present. I never brought up any personal issues that were not relevant to a discussion of porn or disparagement of other members in regards of porn. So i do extend to you an apology however from past encounters with you i'm not so sure you'll be ready to accept it.
[QUOTE=Wootman;46246913]Why are you getting mad over what people on the internet are saying? Don't be a baby.[/QUOTE] As much as I like to say "suck it up because it's the internet", he's just namecalling at this point
[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;46246946]Well, if you legitimately get your jollies off to images of cartoon/real dogs getting fucked (or fucking you) I don't see a problem with calling someone a dogfucker.[/QUOTE] Woah, that's a really slippery slope you're on right now, you're getting into the same logic as people that use racial and homophobic slurs. I know it's not against a race or a sexual orientation, but it's still running in that same line of thought
[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;46246955]Well I guess we should get rid of the flaming rules then.[/QUOTE] *advocates to keep a porn thread* "man it's like this place doesn't even have rules"
[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;46246955]Well I guess we should get rid of the flaming rules then.[/QUOTE] Some people deserve to be flamed to be honest, anything to make them fuck off from the site. [editline]16th October 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Crash155;46246963]As much as I like to say "suck it up because it's the internet", he's just namecalling at this point[/QUOTE] suck it up dogfucker
[QUOTE=Crash155;46246963]As much as I like to say "suck it up because it's the internet", he's just namecalling at this point[/QUOTE] I've said I'm just messing with you, you honestly shouldnt take it to heart. Paramud is being cool we both like sandwiches. nice pony(?) :)
[QUOTE=Fhenexx;46246965]Woah, that's a really slippery slope you're on right now, you're getting into the same logic as people that use racial and homophobic slurs[/QUOTE] except wanting to fuck a dog/cartoon doesnt have anything to do with your inherited genes or love between humans and is actually just fucked up
[QUOTE=innerfire34;46246966]*advocates to keep a porn thread* "man it's like this place doesn't even have rules"[/QUOTE] porn threads != shitposting and calling others "dogfucker"
[QUOTE=Fhenexx;46246965]Woah, that's a really slippery slope you're on right now, you're getting into the same logic as people that use racial and homophobic slurs[/QUOTE] yeah it's plain mean but it's also rude to compare this to gender, sexual, or racial minorities. u aren't born with an interest whack off to cub porn or whatever
[QUOTE=Wootman;46246972]Some people deserve to be flamed to be honest, anything to make them fuck off from the site. [editline]16th October 2014[/editline] suck it up dogfucker[/QUOTE] right as I reply, amazing
[QUOTE=CheeseMan;46246957]Ok, you're gonna make me do this. Searched the artist and found his tumblr. The tags of the image. [img]http://puu.sh/ce5hP/96c5d1167b.png[/img] [url=https://static1.e621.net/data/sample/0e/34/0e34cbc7cb927d2b24680acb5c2745da.jpg]The image in question, since obviously we're playing the disingenuous game.[/url] And if you're gonna try and spring some expertly set trap that 'that doesn't quantify toddlercon', then don't, because I know it doesn't. It's still fucking cub porn, which is the point.[/QUOTE] this isnt toddlercon this is shota toddercon is around babys at age of 0-3 I think
[QUOTE=WhiteHusky;46246958]People in the thread can make a mistake, resulting in someone, in blunt, going, "Hey! Snip that shit quickly or get banned!" resulting in the poster realizing and quickly sweeping their error under the rug while everyone goes, "What happened?" before shortly continuing normal function. Literally everyone is looking out for each other.[/QUOTE] Ok, I find that pretty weird, considering the mods have often discouraged people from the exact same thing in regard to warez. Telling people to 'snip that or you'll get banned' has never been condoned, so why should it be in what is arguably far more disagreeable?
[QUOTE=Manibogi;46246929]Because he's insulting people, derailing the conversation and outright trolling, and nobody's doing a thing even though he was reported multiple times.[/QUOTE] I think mods are waiting for things to die down a bit before doing anything. I think it was dai who said mods try not to ban anyone in threads they've participated in. And a lot of mods are passively participating (being biased one way or another), so no one wants to ban. I could be making this up.
[QUOTE=Wootman;46246972]Some people deserve to be flamed to be honest, anything to make them fuck off from the site. [editline]16th October 2014[/editline] suck it up dogfucker[/QUOTE] Yeah outstanding, dude. "There's people I disagree with on this forum, better treat them like literal shit until they leave. I'm such an upstanding citizen"
[QUOTE=Arc Nova;46246938]smut is different than hobbies masturbating isnt a hobby im sorry[/QUOTE] You miss the point: If someone wants to go to a thread to discuss some shit, whatever it may be(as long as it isn't universally immoral), they should be able to, and if they don't want to, then they don't, and they don't need to click on the thread. and correct, smut is not a hobby, but that doesn't justify your argument very well
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;46246961]so it's not okay to call someone a cunt but its okay to call someone a dog fucker i can't get my head around this concept when literally both terms could be considered flaming[/QUOTE] Is dogfucker too harsh of a word for you? Okay how about canine-doer, does that soften the blow a bit?
[QUOTE=Crash155;46246981]porn threads != shitposting and calling others "dogfucker"[/QUOTE] porn threads that focus specifically on peoples weirdest fetishes in a forum full of minors are worse than hurting a dog-fuckers feelings
[QUOTE=Crash155;46246981]porn threads != shitposting and calling others "dogfucker"[/QUOTE] this is a poll if we had it your fucking way we'd be discussing the fine points of cheetah-kin on leopard-kin porn so
[QUOTE=Seth2492;46246993]Yeah outstanding, dude. "There's people I disagree with on this forum, better treat them like literal shit until they leave. I'm such an upstanding citizen"[/QUOTE] Don't see the big deal not like I really act like this in person.
[QUOTE=WhiteHusky;46246958]People in the thread can make a mistake, resulting in someone, in blunt, going, "Hey! Snip that shit quickly or get banned!" resulting in the poster realizing and quickly sweeping their error under the rug while everyone goes, "What happened?" before shortly continuing normal function. Literally everyone is looking out for each other.[/QUOTE] you realize what the error is he made though... he literally posted anthropomorphic child pornography in a "what turns you on" thread. as much as you might want to moderate that creepy shit away, you can't. it's what turns him on, by definition. his tastes haven't changed at all, he still wants to post that shit. you can't rely on self moderation for these kinds of things, we've seen that fail literally everytime it's been tried.
[QUOTE=SenhorCreeper;46246988]this isnt toddlercon this is shota toddercon is around babys at age of 0-3 I think[/QUOTE] Man, if more people read the entirety of posts in this thread, we'd have less than 40 pages. Look at my last sentence. If you're gonna take my use of terminology in underage furry porn, something I never wish to be well versed in, as a talking point for this then really it just proves that you guys are trying to get as far away from the core of the issue as possible.
there shouldn't even be a debate about this. that's how sad this is
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.