[QUOTE=Apache249;50063831]Aren't TV shows all 24 FPS though?[/QUOTE]
They are but the tv uses software to artificially boost the fps, not up to 120fps but to like 48 maybe. It's noticeably smoother than my parent's old as fuck Plasma Screen TV.
[QUOTE=Apache249;50063831]Aren't TV shows all 24 FPS though?[/QUOTE]
I think there's some software that newer TVs have which smooth out between frames.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZzGm5vkRcw[/media]
Like this I believe?
[QUOTE=Apache249;50063831]Aren't TV shows all 24 FPS though?[/QUOTE]
as far as i know, most american tv shows are filmed at 24 FPS, yes. but there are tvs that can use [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_interpolation"]special tricks[/URL] that play them back at higher fps.
[QUOTE=Apache249;50063831]Aren't TV shows all 24 FPS though?[/QUOTE]
It depends. A lot of shows are filmed at 24 fps, but older shows that were shot directly to video tape were often done at 29.97 fps or 59.94 hz. Live news and sports are normally at 59.94 for a smoother picture. On interlaced signals you can put one frame on the upper field and then different one the lower.
All television programming is locked to a 59.94 signal however, to remain backwards compatible with NTSC which runs at 60 hz. So 24 fps content has to use 3:2 pulldown to be compatible which causes a bit of a stuttery look on none motion interpolated TVs.
Obviously the situation is different with PAL since they use 50 hz, although 24 fps content is usually just sped up to 25 fps.
Totally agree with 3kliks here, although I would've preferred a more scientific approach.
Turning on Vsync just makes the input lag feel awful
[QUOTE=Anti Christ;50064017]as far as i know, most american tv shows are filmed at 24 FPS, yes. but there are tvs that can use [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_interpolation"]special tricks[/URL] that play them back at higher fps.[/QUOTE]
My Grandma's TV must have some shit like this. Dunno what kind of TV it is and such.
It's really weird watching how smooth her TV is, then going home and mine looks so sluggish.
[QUOTE=Hervey;50064401]My Grandma's TV must have some shit like this. Dunno what kind of TV it is and such.
It's really weird watching how smooth her TV is, then going home and mine looks so sluggish.[/QUOTE]
I've seen a lot of TVs use this thing called Auto Motion Plus, which essentially adds frames between existing frames. I never liked it very much because it makes everything you watch look like a soap opera.
I never liked it when TVs do it, because it usually looks like garbage and has tons of artifacting and artifacting should NEVER happen on a 50" OLED 4K. Ridiculous that they try to push that by default.
[QUOTE=Gamerman12;50064498]I never liked it when TVs do it, because it usually looks like garbage and has tons of artifacting and artifacting should NEVER happen on a 50" OLED 4K. Ridiculous that they try to push that by default.[/QUOTE]
I bought a Sony Bravia a few months ago that actually completely omits that feature. Its bizarre since it wasn't a cheap TV either, just a bit over $350 for a 40" (which was [i]on-sale[/i]). But hey, work for me. I guess Sony figured that there was a market for people who want high quality TVs without the motion interpolation bullshit. It wasn't the only reason I bought it, but it certainly helped. :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
