Denmark. We got the money and the power. Also we got about 2000 men to fight. Good luck when we fire our broken tanks and APCS. We just need to pull our soldiers back from afghan.. Then we can take over the world! Muhahhaha.
It was our plan all along. Anders fogh is supported to ban NATO so we can take over everything.
[QUOTE=Rad666;18637580]Which one would you think, Because WWIII is going happen soon, non less.
So vote and have a free meal.[/QUOTE]
I take it you are an american? only american's are stupid enough to think that europe is one country.
[editline]03:47PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=BaconNightmare;18674908]China is pretty much being :byodood: right now with their people and stuff as of now.
USA would probably crumble upon itself before it could really start a massive war. There would be about 10-20 different parties that are sparked, all which claim to solve the war the right way. I think we would find ourselves separated and having war among ourselves before we would be able to fight.
I think this may go well with any large country with diverse populations.
WWIII will probably be extremely controversial, to the point of no one not wanting to fight. News and may contribute to the fire even more.
Rate me whatever, Im writing this as a stream of thought.[/QUOTE]
WWIII would be over in a matter of hours, as all country's capable of launching a nuclear attack will, starting with the united states, followed by china and south korea.
Maybe the british folks will take over and rape us with their accent and tea. Bloody bastards
I'm split between The US of A or Mother Russia......
A total of 102,000 soldiers are currently on active service in the German Army. Of these, approximately 17,000 are draftees. Additionally, a further 35,000 personnel of reservists of the German Army reserve force are available.
Yeah, they won't be starting any WW3
Royal Netherlands Army
Flag of the Netherlands.svg
Active 9 January 1814–present
Country the Netherlands
Type Army
Size 27,000 active
Equipment
Armour
Tracked
* 88 Leopard 2A6 main battle tanks + 28 Reserve(to be sold in 2010) + 200 Leopard 1V (V = improved A5) in storage
* 184 CV9035NL infantry fighting vehicles (deliveries until end of 2011)
* More than 1600 AIFV (YPR-765) infantry fighting vehicles. Several versions: Armoured personnel carrier (APC), Anti-Tank, Command Post Vehicle, Reconnaissance, Engineering, Battle Damage Repair, Recovery (YPR806), Cargo, Battlefield Ambulance. The YPR-765 is internationally known under the name AIFV, which was developed based on the M113. The majority of these vehicles will be replaced by the CV9035NL, Fennek and Boxer.
Wheeled
* 438 Fennek armoured vehicles. Several versions: reconnaissance, general purpose, medium range anti tank, air defence vehicle, forward observer and tactical air control party (28 on order, 410 delivered)
* 200 Boxer armoured fighting vehicles (deliveries between 2010-2016)
* 90 Patria XA-188 armoured personnel carriers or ambulances
* 92 Bushmaster infantry mobility vehicles (14 bought in July + another 14 bought in August)
Other armoured vehicles
Leopard 2A6 Main battle tank of the Royal Netherlands Army.
* M577 command vehicle (replaced by the Boxer)
* 25 Büffel (Leopard 2) recovery tanks
* 14 Biber Leopard 1 bridgelayers (will be replaced by the PSB2)
* 14 Leopard 1 armoured engineer vehicles (to be replaced by 10 AEV-3 KODIAK).
* 22 Leopard 1 recovery tanks
* 17 Fuchs 1 Electronic Warfare vehicles
* 6 Fuchs 1 NBC reconnaissance vehicles
Other vehicles
There are thousands of vehicles in several versions:
* DAF Trucks, various versions with Broshuis trailers
* Scania PLS Trucks, various versions
* MB 290GD Wolf 4WD car, various versions
* Mercedes-Benz 280 CDI, various versions
* Land Rover Wolf 4WD car, various versions
[edit] Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
* EMT Aladin
Artillery
PzH 2000 155 mm Self-propelled howitzer of the Royal Netherlands Army.
* 36 PzH 2000 self-propelled howitzers
* 39 M-109's artillery systems (phased out).
Nope, we won't be it either.
[QUOTE=mobrockers;18680324]Royal Netherlands Army
Type Army
[/QUOTE]
Awesome :fuckyou:
[QUOTE=Bean-O;18658716]I don't know who will start it but the US will definitely be part of it.[/QUOTE]
Most civilized nations would be a part of it because we all have treaties with each other that we would help each other in case of war.
[QUOTE=Sasupoika;18637877]The WWI wasn't started by Germany, actually the first war-declaration came from Austria-Hungary. After that more followed. Germany just lost the war.
The reason why WWII started was because Germany lost the WWI. Germany had to pay huge amounts of money as punishment, had to give away regions of the county, couldn't have army larger than x etc.
Germans wanted to elevate Germany into a great power once again. That is how Hitler got into power.
And Soviet Russia doesn't exist anymore, it collapsed 1993. Unless...[/QUOTE]
WW2 was not directly started by the Versailles Treaty. E.g the Locarno spring made Germany much much more prosperous and brought it back on its feet thanks to Stressemann, unfortunately the Great Depression hit and Hitler could make his final moves to take power.
Also the USSR collapsed in 1991, thankfully, what a pointless country
[editline]10:34PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Virtanen;18638131]A ridiculous poll, huge wars are so confusing no one knows who started them, WW2 was an exception.
But tell me, who really started WW1? Or the 7 Years' war?[/QUOTE]
Indirectly WWI was started by most of the European countries:
-the alliance system
-arms race
-naval race
-tangiers crisis
-july crisis
-etc...
[editline]10:36PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=brainmaster;18639601]That student that shot the duke, he was a member of Black hand (Or something).
Austria started it, Germany followed, then everyone else followed.[/QUOTE]
That student was only a trigger to the short events that essentially started the "fighting"
-war by timetable
-july crisis
[editline]10:38PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ThePuska;18641254]57.5% of the swiss just voted yes to banning the building of new minarets
Source: [url]http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE5AS12D20091129[/url][/QUOTE]
thing is the minarets would have been banned eventually, trust me I live there
People would complain about the noise and height of the minarets = ban
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
