The Gay Chat Thread - dildo bong edition - General

[QUOTE=Fingers!!!;39429245]Oh God [t]http://i.imgur.com/bvHXFxJ.jpg[/t] What have I dooone[/QUOTE] Wow. And it's not even the new one. The third one just came out last month and I'd totally buy it, if it was digital. I kinda don't want to be seen reading obvious gay furry smut. The books are pretty good though.

[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;39430236]What's so bad about Marxism?[/QUOTE] ~100 million corpses [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] also lax academic standards

It's just more or less not a fucking forum, since it's a goddamn university course. [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] Stalinism was pretty unmarxist. It was an oligarchical society.

[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;39430323] Stalinism was pretty unmarxist. It was an oligarchical society.[/QUOTE] I dont even know what half these words means god damn newfangled newage words. or maybe there is a reason why I didn't go to college and instead digging holes in roads with people whose vocabulary consists of 99% nigger and fuck.

[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;39430323]It's just more or less not a fucking forum, since it's a goddamn university course. [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] Stalinism was pretty unmarxist. It was an oligarchical society.[/QUOTE] even if you discount stalinism you've still got dozens of others

[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;39430507]even if you discount stalinism you've still got dozens of others[/QUOTE] the problem with marxism is that it doesn't account for human greed and power lust

[QUOTE=Chaplin;39430524]the problem with marxism is that it doesn't account for human greed and power lust[/QUOTE] which is why i'm particularly concerned about its prevalence in academia as marxists and their allies have historically suppressed research into innate human traits for ideological reasons

marxism is probably the most fucking boring thing ive ever witnessed and it comes up too much its stupid as well. Marx must have had fucking super aspergers to think you can work out, understand etc like... everything in humanity and human nature (I don't even say this as a slur or to make fun of aspergers I just feel he can't have had a great grasp on how the mind works. its not all as formulaic as that.) plus fucking ayn rand Jesus Christ [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] I'll say this now in case I get called out for being dumb I dont know that much about marxism [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] but enough to form an opinion, id say [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] and it ties in with communism a lot which is dumb imo. capitalism kinda sucks as well but maybe its my greedy self but id rather live in a capitalist world than a communist one (not that worldwide communism would ever work or happen)

[QUOTE=Fingers!!!;39429245]Oh God [t]http://i.imgur.com/bvHXFxJ.jpg[/t] What have I dooone[/QUOTE] I actually tried reading that, and it was just so bleugh Overall it ranks sixty-seven on my list of awful published erotica

Lol. You're fucking stupid. Marxism doesn't tie in with Communism. Communism ties in with Marxism. Yeah, a Capitalistic world is better than a communist one. No shit. The problem is that ideal communism isn't exactly possible. Something like the Federation in Star Trek would be a proper communist state. But yeah. The overall problem with it all is that it just isn't possible, and as a result, it's been mostly communism in name only and more of an authoritative regime. Until we reach a post scarcity society (Never). Communism will never be an actually decent government type. [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Ray-The-Sun;39430738]I actually tried reading that, and it was just so bleugh Overall it ranks sixty-seven on my list of awful published erotica[/QUOTE] As Erotica, it's pretty mediocre. I used to read a lot of sports novels so I digg the series. I just see it as a sports novel within the gay romance genre.

I like mark's ism. He leads a very honourable lifestyle.

[QUOTE=mikeyt493;39430648]its stupid as well. Marx must have had [b]fucking super aspergers[/b] to think you can work out, understand etc like... everything in humanity and human nature ([b]I don't even say this as a slur or to make fun of aspergers[/b] I just feel he can't have had a great grasp on how the mind works. its not all as formulaic as that.)[/QUOTE] Sounds like slurring to me bruv

[QUOTE=Teto;39430806]I like mark's ism. He leads a very honourable lifestyle.[/QUOTE] I respect your contribution to Marxism. [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Josip_Broz_Tito_official_portrait.jpg[/img]

But really, as I said to my brother a couple weeks ago when he was talking politics and I had to ask what "right wing" and "left wing" meant, I should really start paying attention.

marxism is basically pseudoscience

[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;39430813]I respect your contribution to Marxism. [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Josip_Broz_Tito_official_portrait.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] To add to this. I gotta give props to Tito. He was perhaps the only marxist leader who really stuck to it and created a society that did pretty good for the people.

hi welcome to the gay chat and marxism discussion thread

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;39430852]marxism is basically pseudoscience[/QUOTE] It's like a world war 1 tank. It's awesome and cool and can do a lot. But they didn't take into effect that it can fall into ditches. [img]http://puu.sh/1Vz6M[/img]

[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;39430774]Lol. You're fucking stupid. Marxism doesn't tie in with Communism. Communism ties in with Marxism. Yeah, a Capitalistic world is better than a communist one. No shit. The problem is that ideal communism isn't exactly possible. Something like the Federation in Star Trek would be a proper communist state. But yeah. The overall problem with it all is that it just isn't possible, and as a result, it's been mostly communism in name only and more of an authoritative regime. Until we reach a post scarcity society (Never). Communism will never be an actually decent government type. [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] As Erotica, it's pretty mediocre. I used to read a lot of sports novels so I digg the series. I just see it as a sports novel within the gay romance genre.[/QUOTE] lol ok I got the order mixed up but whatever the point still stands yes exactly its impossible because Marx doesn't seem to understand the concept of selfishness or greed if he honestly believed we could live in a world like yeah as you said, star trek where I'm pretty sure currency doesn't exist? I also feel that a perfect communistic world is technically a utopia but utopia is impossible ( and if you ask me living in a utopia is synonymous with a dystopia. there's definitely such a thing as too perfect. what'd be the point In anything If you lived in a utopia? there wouldnt really be any)

[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;39430869]To add to this. I gotta give props to Tito. He was perhaps the only marxist leader who really stuck to it and created a society that did pretty good for the people.[/QUOTE] People call me Tito a lot so I was really confused for a second. I'm learning new things all the time it seems. [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Slowbro;39430810]Sounds like slurring to me bruv[/QUOTE] Yeah mikey, "unreasonable view of the world" doesn't always boil down to Asperger's. So WOW

So Marxism isn't good, got it. But then what's a good alternative against American Right Wing? Because unless I'm wrong (probably am) the American Democratic Party promises alot, but usually it doesn't really happen.

[QUOTE=latin_geek;39429191]what fetish and what character this is important[/QUOTE] Muk and vore.

Pretty much every fetish I can sorta go "I guess I can see what they find appealing".. but vore is possibly the only one I see as flat weird

The only fetish that I just don't see appealing in the slightest is diapers. [sp]Body possession and weight gain fetishist here.[/sp]

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;39425854]After spending several months in college, the compulsory part of my HNC (Sociology), I now have reason to suspect is a pseudoscience filled with crackpots speculating about how the world works. My sociology teacher mistook inverse sin for sin minus 1 and spends much of his time going on about how great Marxism is.[/QUOTE] Sociology is valid but it's like psychology (also valid) in the sense that you can convince people you know what you're talking about when you really don't [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=cheetahben;39431534]The only fetish that I just don't see appealing in the slightest is diapers. [sp]Body possession and weight gain fetishist here.[/sp][/QUOTE] What's a body possession fetish You found one I don't know of

[QUOTE=Zeke129;39431535] What's a body possession fetish You found one I don't know of[/QUOTE] Getting a Boner from watching Exorcist maybe?

For some reasons I'm not aware of, someone's body having a mind of their own is just really nice. Especially chest or stomach-wise. HELP ME I'M NOT SURE WHY I'M INTO IT

[QUOTE=Rents;39431501]Muk and vore.[/QUOTE] oh god why

[QUOTE=mikeyt493;39430892]lol ok I got the order mixed up but whatever the point still stands yes exactly its impossible because Marx doesn't seem to understand the concept of selfishness or greed if he honestly believed we could live in a world like yeah as you said, star trek where I'm pretty sure currency doesn't exist? I also feel that a perfect communistic world is technically a utopia but utopia is impossible ( and if you ask me living in a utopia is synonymous with a dystopia. there's definitely such a thing as too perfect. what'd be the point In anything If you lived in a utopia? there wouldnt really be any)[/QUOTE] Star Trek is kinda iffy about the economics side of it. Within the Federation, They're a currencyless society, but outside of it, there's a lot to do with it. I'm sure that the currency is mostly a government thing for it. They don't really get in depth beyond Ferengi economics. [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;39431136]So Marxism isn't good, got it. But then what's a good alternative against American Right Wing? Because unless I'm wrong (probably am) the American Democratic Party promises alot, but usually it doesn't really happen.[/QUOTE] Don't know where you're hearing the doesn't happen side of it. I trust them more than the Republican party, mainly because they have a pretty good track record on it. [editline]31st January 2013[/editline] Is body possession like hypnotism fetish? Or are they different things but similar?

[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;39431665] Is body possession like hypnotism fetish? Or are they different things but similar?[/QUOTE] Different things. Hypnotism wouldn't turn me on very much, I think.