[QUOTE=Jake Nukem;24661082]I don't have a problem with Zoophiles. So long as it doesn't hurt or in anyway discomfort the animal. We keep some for pets, Others to slaughter and eat. It's that people have a long standing view that it is 'wrong' and will firmly hold onto that belief because it is what they think is right. Just like some would argue that religion is right and whatnot.[/QUOTE]
I'd have to slightly agree. I'd rather we crack down on animal cruelty and poaching first. There are far more worse thing's people do to animals than sticking their naughty thing's in their unmentionables. Not that this makes it okay to do it.
[QUOTE=FreeThinker;24660606]
[img]http://05.img.v4.skyrock.net/050/bande-de-bolos/pics/500393816_small.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
[i]A cat is fine too~[/i]
It makes me sick to think the left wing youths of the future will be giving box forts to the people who are against Furries and Zoophiles, much like today and gays
[editline]05:28PM[/editline]
I cuddle my cat a lot, does that make me a zoophile?
How can we tell f that cat and pet in the OP are actually like that
[QUOTE=teeheeV2;24661307]It makes me sick to think the left wing youths of the future will be giving box forts to the people who are against Furries and Zoophiles, much like today and gays
[editline]05:28PM[/editline]
I cuddle my cat a lot, does that make me a zoophile?
How can we tell f that cat and pet in the OP are actually like that[/QUOTE]
way to compare furrys with zoophiles. furrys have a fetish with other humans. some may be annoying, others, not so much. dont hate a whole group for the actions of a subgroup.
[QUOTE=teeheeV2;24661307]It makes me sick to think the left wing youths of the future will be giving box forts to the people who are against Furries and Zoophiles, much like today and gays
[editline]05:28PM[/editline]
I cuddle my cat a lot, does that make me a zoophile?
How can we tell f that cat and pet in the OP are actually like that[/QUOTE]
DON'T COMPARE US TO ZOOPHILES
Except when we compare ourselves to zoophiles.
[QUOTE=teeheeV2;24661307]It makes me sick to think the left wing youths of the future will be giving box forts to the people who are against Furries and Zoophiles, much like today and gays
[editline]05:28PM[/editline]
I cuddle my cat a lot, does that make me a zoophile?
How can we tell f that cat and pet in the OP are actually like that[/QUOTE]
Left wing youth? Wut? I'm pretty damn liberal, and I still think it's not right.
I wasn't comparing in that way, i meant it to be that they are both groups that are prosecuted, just like gays were/are.
coincidentally both fetishes have tails and ears
[QUOTE=Xen Tricks;24661395]Left wing youth? Wut? I'm pretty damn liberal, and I still think it's not right.[/QUOTE]
Lying to yourself
[QUOTE=Xen Tricks;24661395]Left wing youth? Wut? I'm pretty damn liberal, and I still think it's not right.[/QUOTE]
The future ones.
[QUOTE=FreeThinker;24661408]Lying to yourself[/QUOTE]
Freethinker is the best troll in this thread.
[QUOTE=FreeThinker;24660606][b]Myth:[/b] This shit is disguisting, so zoophilia must stay banned
[b]Fact:[/b] Just as homosexual sex seems disguisting to some people, zoophile sex may look disguisting to some also. However, this doesn't justify gay or zoophile rights to be banned.[/QUOTE]
You fucking idiot, there's a difference between fucking someone of your species (gay or not), and fucking something that ISN'T. :effort:
[editline]09:49AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Xoniao;24660718]i got a email once from a website called "beastforum" thought it was a game or something but i ended up hospital right after.[/QUOTE]
I googled it.
Holy hell, I'm glad I used incognito-mode :tinfoil:
[editline]09:55AM[/editline]
As the brave man I am I explored the dark cave of BeastForum.
Well, thank god they have an image-filter that requires you to log in.
[editline]10:02AM[/editline]
Oh, get the fuck out.
[img]http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1909/ohgetthefuckout.png[/img]
What the fuck.
[QUOTE=Kybalt;24660976]dont start this shit. everyone deserves human rights.[/QUOTE]
This is true, but animal rights are different from human rights (I disagree with this on the terms that animals should have the right to live on this planet in the same way as we do).
Here's a question for brave minds: If animals evolved to the point where they developed a sentient mind, would/should it be illegal for consenting... Individuals from both species to have relations/sex/marriage?
It's an interesting thought, one that is toyed with in Mass Effect.
[QUOTE=Darth_GW7;24662301]This is true, but animal rights are different from human rights (I disagree with this on the terms that animals should have the right to live on this planet in the same way as we do).
[b]Here's a question for brave minds: If animals evolved to the point where they developed a sentient mind, would/should it be illegal for consenting... Individuals from both species to have relations/sex/marriage?
It's an interesting thought, one that is toyed with in Mass Effect.[/b][/QUOTE]
why the fuck not
[QUOTE=Darth_GW7;24662301]This is true, but animal rights are different from human rights (I disagree with this on the terms that animals should have the right to live on this planet in the same way as we do).
Here's a question for brave minds: If animals evolved to the point where they developed a sentient mind, would/should it be illegal for consenting... Individuals from both species to have relations/sex/marriage?
It's an interesting thought, one that is toyed with in Mass Effect.[/QUOTE]
If you want to ask that, Whales and Dolphins are already considered sentient by many scientists. They still can't really give any consent other than raping you themselves.
[QUOTE=FreeThinker;24660606]
[IMG]http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Video/060103/on_dolphin_wedding_060103.300w.jpg[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
She is married to a dolphin.
It isn't natural to love another species.
nothing born under the sun should
and no amount of hypertolerant bullshit's going to change that.
[QUOTE=Nerdrage;24662395]It isn't natural to love another species.
nothing born under the sun should
and no amount of hypertolerant bullshit's going to change that.[/QUOTE]
Computers aren't natural, and yet we use them on a daily basis.
Clothes aren't natural, but we wear them to cover up and to give us warmth.
The world isn't natural nowadays, there's no point stopping it so what needs to be done is to teach people to be more tolerant about it.
[QUOTE=Nerdrage;24662395]It isn't natural to love another species.
nothing born under the sun should
and no amount of hypertolerant bullshit's going to change that.[/QUOTE]
Actually it's natural, just like homosexuality is.
This guys obviously a troll, he has been banned for almost half the time his been here. A majority of the bans are for trolling too.
[QUOTE=Nerdrage;24662395]It isn't natural to love another species.
nothing born under the sun should
and no amount of hypertolerant bullshit's going to change that.[/QUOTE]
I think you mean It isn't natural to fuck another species.Love is perfectly natural.
[QUOTE=OvB;24662345]If you want to ask that, Whales and Dolphins are already considered sentient by many scientists. They still can't really give any consent other than raping you themselves.[/QUOTE]
I'll rephrase that, then: If they become sentient enough that cross-species communication is possible to the widest extent of the English/dolphin (or other species') language.
[editline]10:15AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=poopsicle;24662439]This guys obviously a troll, he has been banned for almost half the time his been here. A majority of the bans are for trolling too.[/QUOTE]
Maybe so, but the topic is still up for discussion.
[editline]10:17AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=wankmeo88;24662451]I think you mean It isn't natural to fuck another species.Love is perfectly natural.[/QUOTE]
If it is possible for two species to love each other (That is, a true mutual love, not just the love that comes from a pet to its owner), then why is sex wrong? Considering how sex is meant to be (at least to me) an expression of this love, then where is the problem?
[QUOTE=Darth_GW7;24662430]Computers aren't natural, and yet we use them on a daily basis.
Clothes aren't natural, but we wear them to cover up and to give us warmth.
The world isn't natural nowadays, there's no point stopping it so what needs to be done is to teach people to be more tolerant about it.[/QUOTE]
computers let us expand our thinking capabilities and organise and entertain us, they are tools, using tools is natural for mankind
clothes keep us warm, keeping warm is a need, clothes are basically tools.
now, in nature, if a snail tried to procreate with a cockroach, that isn't natural, it would not benefit the species, and completely invalidates all rules of attraction to the fittest of the species, that allows that species to evolve.
[QUOTE=Nerdrage;24662511]computers let us expand our thinking capabilities and organise and entertain us, they are tools, using tools is natural for mankind
clothes keep us warm, keeping warm is a need, clothes are basically tools.
now, in nature, if a snail tried to procreate with a cockroach, that isn't natural, it would not benefit the species, and completely invalidates all rules of attraction to the fittest of the species, that allows that species to evolve.[/QUOTE]
Love does benefit both involved parties, in terms of happiness. Apart from that, you're right, love serves no purpose apart from procreation. But does that mean it should be stopped?
If it's possible (The big word here is IF) for both species to be truly in love with each other, why should sex be wrong?
gross
[QUOTE=pyrofiliac;24662570]gross[/QUOTE]
Better than having sex with fire, [B]pyro[/B]philiac. :smug:
[QUOTE=Darth_GW7;24662547]Love does benefit both involved parties, in terms of happiness. Apart from that, you're right, love serves no purpose apart from procreation. But does that mean it should be stopped?
If it's possible (The big word here is IF) for both species to be truly in love with each other, why should sex be wrong?[/QUOTE]
with animals, it's near impossible to determine they have true attraction to the person, even then, they wont receive pleasure from sex as humans do.
perhaps this argument would be more relevant if earth had two advanced species, however, human nature would never allow that.
proof? if they killed so many Australian natives, whoa re of their own species? god knows what'll happen
What the fuck is wrong with a chick with a normal set of tits instead of a flat 6 nippled pig.
You're sick.
[QUOTE=Nerdrage;24662594]with animals, it's near impossible to determine they have true attraction to the person, even then, they wont receive pleasure from sex as humans do.
perhaps this argument would be more relevant if earth had two advanced species, however, human nature would never allow that.
proof? if they killed so many Australian natives, whoa re of their own species? god knows what'll happen[/QUOTE]
That's what I'm arguing here, about having another "Advanced" species.
We'll just have to wait and see if it happens.
[editline]10:34AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Reach Monster;24662600]What the fuck is wrong with a chick with a normal set of tits instead of a flat 6 nippled pig.
You're sick.[/QUOTE]
That's your opinion, there are lots of things that you and I might find creepy as hell, but someone will like it.
Wow, Facepunch sure is ignorant and intolerant. I agree with FreeThinker.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
