Forum Discussion v5 - Imagine if you used Ignore List. - General

[QUOTE=Reagy;53034390]I guess might work but it'd likely still screw up with shit like twitter, document ready state is still sent even if their shit is still loading due to JS fuckery.[/QUOTE] This can be done with: [code]$(window).bind("load", function() { alert("Page Fully Loaded"); });[/code] This waits for everything to finish loading before firing. I've had this happen before but I can't reproduce it so if someone wants to just replace the alert with scrolling to the correct post then it should work fine.

[QUOTE=WitheredGryphon;53034426]This can be done with: [code]$(window).bind("load", function() { alert("Page Fully Loaded"); });[/code] This waits for everything to finish loading before firing. I've had this happen before but I can't reproduce it so if someone wants to just replace the alert with scrolling to the correct post then it should work fine.[/QUOTE] The code for scrolling to the correct post should be this: [CODE]window.scrollTo(0, document.querySelector(document.location.hash.replace(/\post(.+)/, "post_$1")).getBoundingClientRect().top);[/CODE] Though it seems to have a really weird quirk that requires it to be run twice for some reason. That code alternatively provides one of two values with one being wildly different than the other and I'm not actually certain why. Edit: This version seems to work more reliably even though getBoundingClientRect() is supposed to be the more proper way of doing things: [CODE]window.scrollTo(0, document.querySelector(document.location.hash.replace(/\post(.+)/, "post_$1")).offsetTop);[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Alice3173;53034437]The code for scrolling to the correct post should be this: [CODE]window.scrollTo(0, document.querySelector(document.location.hash.replace(/\post(.+)/, "post_$1")).getBoundingClientRect().top);[/CODE] Though it seems to have a really weird quirk that requires it to be run twice for some reason. That code alternatively provides one of two values with one being wildly different than the other and I'm not actually certain why. Edit: This version seems to work more reliably even though getBoundingClientRect() is supposed to be the more proper way of doing things: [CODE]window.scrollTo(0, document.querySelector(document.location.hash.replace(/\post(.+)/, "post_$1")).offsetTop);[/CODE][/QUOTE] This is a bit cleaner and as far as I can tell it works as well: [code]$(window).bind("load", function() { var data = window.location.hash.substr(1); if(data) { location.hash = data; } });[/code] Just sets the hash value again after the page has fully loaded and scrolls to it instantly. Was able to test it a little bit by loading a page and quickly scrolling away from the desired post and waiting to see if it'd jump me back, which it did. Someone feel free to test it out though, like I said, can't exactly reproduce it.

If you don't touch the scroll wheel and just wait for the page to load you'll stay at your post

[QUOTE=Reagy;53034241]Not really possible to fix as its a browser thing, the browser takes you to the correct position but then the media content loads in shifting the page. You'll find that once you have all the bullshit on the page cached and you refresh to go to the linked post, it'll work perfectly fine (unless there is embedded media like twitter on the page, then it will always shift the page as that shit can't be cached).[/QUOTE] that should be fixable through either javascript or php by making it go to the linked post after the page is fully loaded. knowing vbulletin it probably doesn't like doing that though [editline]8th January 2018[/editline] [QUOTE=Ott;53034505]If you don't touch the scroll wheel and just wait for the page to load you'll stay at your post[/QUOTE] not in my experience

[QUOTE=garry;53030915]We definitely are going to add more positive ratings and remove some of the others. Just a case of getting a decent icon for them :)[/QUOTE] Does this mean we only have a limited time to rate people child molester? Can we have a rating scoreboard? So once child molester and snowflake are removed we can see who is the child molester, maybe give them a custom badge or something Also, liking the new forum, at first I really hated it but now I prefer it to this one.

[url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1590555&p=53034867&viewfull=1#post53034867[/url] How is this not just a zero-effort shitpost?

[QUOTE=AtomicSans;53035562][url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1590555&p=53034867&viewfull=1#post53034867[/url] How is this not just a zero-effort shitpost?[/QUOTE] Cause they're a mod.

[QUOTE=AtomicSans;53035562][url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1590555&p=53034867&viewfull=1#post53034867[/url] How is this not just a zero-effort shitpost?[/QUOTE] It's a moderator calling somebody out on their bad behaviour

I just noticed that you can sort threads in subforums alphabetically by their author's name. Why is that a feature? :v:

[QUOTE=Hezzy;53035826]It's a moderator calling somebody out on their bad behaviour[/QUOTE] Is it a mods job to call people out for shitposting, or ban them for shitposting?

[QUOTE=BANNED USER;53035932]Is it a mods job to call people out for shitposting, or ban them for shitposting?[/QUOTE] Warn them and then ban them if necessary?

who even cares, some internet randomer wrote "Edgy" and you're all out with pitchforks looking for them to get banned? people on this forum need to toughen up a little.

[QUOTE=BANNED USER;53035932]Is it a mods job to call people out for shitposting, or ban them for shitposting?[/QUOTE] I sometimes will call the person out on dumb posts rather than banning them. Just depends. Sometimes public humiliation is more effective at getting them to stop being a goof.

[QUOTE=BANNED USER;53035932]Is it a mods job to call people out for shitposting, or ban them for shitposting?[/QUOTE] I suppose all the other posts calling the person out on bad behaviour are shitposts as well? Nah. Besides, the dude was clearly banned when Kiwi got to it. I refer you all to the first post. If you want to make a complaint about a Moderator, then do it via PM. Don't post it in this thread.

[QUOTE=loopoo;53035952]who even cares, some internet randomer wrote "Edgy" and you're all out with pitchforks looking for them to get banned? people on this forum need to toughen up a little.[/QUOTE] It's because if anyone else made that post, they would have been banned for "why reply"

[QUOTE=Pascall;53035953]I sometimes will call the person out on dumb posts rather than banning them. Just depends. Sometimes public humiliation is more effective at getting them to stop being a goof.[/QUOTE] case in point: [QUOTE=Pascall;52359185]I think they are laughing at you, not the post.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=The Genie;53035969]Why do all warnings have to be in the form of a ban?[/QUOTE] Either it's easier for the moderation team to handle rule-breakers or it's just a kind of a tradition at this point.

[QUOTE=The Genie;53035969]Why do all warnings have to be in the form of a ban?[/QUOTE] Because it's in The Rules? [img]https://i.imgur.com/pOZDuWF.png[/img]

it also gives everyone else entertainment in the form of reading their salty threads posted in the refugee camp. warnings don't provide that.

I don't understand why suddenly there's an issue when Kiwi opts to call someone out rather than ban but I do that more often than literally any other moderator on the team lol. If you're gonna have an issue then at least be consistent about it. This complaint has no real merit imo.

[QUOTE=loopoo;53035987]it also gives everyone else entertainment in the form of reading their salty threads posted in the refugee camp. warnings don't provide that.[/QUOTE] the RC has mostly been on a low sodium diet lately. it seems ban compliancy is increasing.

Or just Rust players post on Newpunch now.

[QUOTE=Pascall;53035994]I don't understand why suddenly there's an issue when Kiwi opts to call someone out rather than ban but I do that more often than literally any other moderator on the team lol. If you're gonna have an issue then at least be consistent about it. This complaint has no real merit imo.[/QUOTE] It's the same reason mods don't ban every single rule breaker. Posts slip through the cracks, not everyone can be bothered to go through PM and report a mod to Hezzy (or would even think to do so in the first place). Normally with reporting shitposts I can just easily click two buttons and be on my way, it makes it more difficult if I have to defend my stance over a single complaint about a moderator via PM. It takes up way too much time for what should be just a simple "hey I think this post is shit." Not that I'm endorsing it because I think it's shitposting regardless of your standing on the forums, but it is what it is. If it's a mod it just lowers my opinion of them and I move on with my day. IOW it's not just Kiwi, but Kiwi just happened to be the one who got called out for it.

can a mod tell me when the last time I reported a post was?

When was Gold posting in RC removed?

[QUOTE=loopoo;53036065]can a mod tell me when the last time I reported a post was?[/QUOTE] We don't have logs of that. [editline]8th January 2018[/editline] [QUOTE=WitheredGryphon;53036050]It's the same reason mods don't ban every single rule breaker. Posts slip through the cracks, not everyone can be bothered to go through PM and report a mod to Hezzy (or would even think to do so in the first place). Normally with reporting shitposts I can just easily click two buttons and be on my way, it makes it more difficult if I have to defend my stance over a single complaint about a moderator via PM. It takes up way too much time for what should be just a simple "hey I think this post is shit." Not that I'm endorsing it because I think it's shitposting regardless of your standing on the forums, but it is what it is. If it's a mod it just lowers my opinion of them and I move on with my day. IOW it's not just Kiwi, but Kiwi just happened to be the one who got called out for it.[/QUOTE] Fair enough I guess. I disagree, but thanks for explaining your point at least. To be fair in return though, you can also report a moderator via the report post option (which nobody did for Kiwi, at least not that I saw in the report queue). Chances are at least one of us will see it, but you'll probably be asked to defend why you reported them. Either way, you're gonna have to explain when you have an issue with a mod so it'll be work for you no matter what route you choose whether or use the report function or PM Hezzy.

[QUOTE=Pascall;53036164] To be fair in return though, you can also report a moderator via the report post option (which nobody did for Kiwi, at least not that I saw in the report queue). Chances are at least one of us will see it, but you'll probably be asked to defend why you reported them. Either way, you're gonna have to explain when you have an issue with a mod so it'll be work for you no matter what route you choose whether or use the report function or PM Hezzy.[/QUOTE] Not that I take issues with Kiwi's post, but in the past, people have been banned for reporting moderators so I've seen, so that is something that I had believed should be avoided.

[QUOTE=Pascall;53036164]We don't have logs of that. [editline]8th January 2018[/editline] Fair enough I guess. I disagree, but thanks for explaining your point at least. To be fair in return though, you can also report a moderator via the report post option (which nobody did for Kiwi, at least not that I saw in the report queue). Chances are at least one of us will see it, but you'll probably be asked to defend why you reported them. Either way, you're gonna have to explain when you have an issue with a mod so it'll be work for you no matter what route you choose whether or use the report function or PM Hezzy.[/QUOTE] I've always been under the impression that reporting a mod was a bannable offense. I'm not sure if it's just bad memory but I seem to recall people being banned for doing so in the past. If that's not the case then that's my fault up to this point :pudge:

If the report is legitimate, it'll be discussed in the moderator chat, as are many reports that we get. If it's not legitimate, it'll either be dismissed entirely or the user will be banned. Both outcomes require a discussion either way. If you're banned because of a report, it's because of mod consensus (or at least mod majority) deciding that the report was silly or otherwise a waste of time. Trust me, we don't all get along or love each other or support each other 100%. We'll call each other out on bullshit quite frequently.