• Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    559 replies, posted
I haven't been a huge fan of Harry Potter, but it isn't a terrible series. It's just not really my style. I have somehow managed to get myself to see each of the movies and I'm seeing this one later today.
[QUOTE=Killuah;16051871]I just noticed the Y in Harry Potter is missing behind Dumbledores head. It's so well known by now they don't even have to show the full logo.[/QUOTE] No, they just renamed it to Harr Potter
oh god Luna cried ;_;
what a disappointing op...
[QUOTE=Lord of Ears;16052588]oh god Luna cried ;_;[/QUOTE] Luna is hawt :)
I STILL don't see why they just don't shoot Voldemort in the face.
[QUOTE=McSanchez;16052751]I STILL don't see why they just don't shoot Voldemort in the face.[/QUOTE] He's invincible
[QUOTE=McSanchez;16052751]I STILL don't see why they just don't shoot Voldemort in the face.[/QUOTE] There's alot of things in movies you could say that about.
[QUOTE=huntskikbut;16051594]Pretty sure that the books did that first.[/QUOTE] Yeah, they went from "ADULTS AND CHILDREN LOVE IT!!!" to something serious and self-respecting (it goes both ways, though). I suppose Rowling's learnt quite a bit in the process.
[QUOTE=Echidna666;16052799]He's invincible[/QUOTE] I guess Voldemort is like Superman where you can only hurt him with kryptonite or magic.
i like the part with credits
[QUOTE=McSanchez;16052851]I guess Voldemort is like Superman where you can only hurt him with kryptonite or magic.[/QUOTE] There's a seriously fucked up reason (not in a pejorative sense) that's something to do with the death of his parents or whatnot.
[QUOTE=McSanchez;16052851]I guess Voldemort is like Superman where you can only hurt him with kryptonite or magic.[/QUOTE] It's mainly to do with the horcruxes
I don't see why everyone's so hyped about the sixth. The book is probably one of the worst in the series, so I'm guessing the movie'll be "meh" by HP standards too.
[QUOTE=archie200034;16053017]I don't see why everyone's so hyped about the sixth. The book is probably one of the worst in the series, so I'm guessing the movie'll be "meh" by HP standards too.[/QUOTE] Personally I thought it was the best book. It seems to be the best movie as well so far according to critics I've posted in this thread a lot
I'm just excited for The Deathly Hallows b/c Bill Nighy is going to play a role! :) [img]http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/m/bafta_la_021107/bill_nighy_1646213.jpg[/img]
I'm surprised this thread hasn't degenerated into musings about how hot emma watson/hermionie is yet... [QUOTE=Moby-;16052642]Luna is hawt :)[/QUOTE] What the fuck, no she's not [img]http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41286000/jpg/_41286732_luna_evanna_big.jpg[/img] If that's hot, I'd hate to see your definition of ugly.
[QUOTE=professional;16053169]I'm surprised this thread hasn't degenerated into musings about how hot emma watson/hermionie is yet...[/QUOTE] Evanna Lynch/Luna is better imo
Come on guys seriously, its the nerd version of twilight right here.
Twilight = utter shit Harry Potter = average
[QUOTE=abigserve;16053252]Come on guys seriously, its the nerd version of twilight right here.[/QUOTE] Why?
[QUOTE=Sasso;16053291]Twilight = utter shit Harry Potter = average[/QUOTE] Make Harry Potter = good just because of Emma Watson.
[QUOTE=abigserve;16053252]Come on guys seriously, its the nerd version of twilight right here.[/QUOTE] It came out LONG before Twlight you jerkoff I'm going to go see in an hour should be good.
Maybe if it wasn't a Teenage angst love movie.
[QUOTE=iamgnome;16053331]It came out LONG before Twlight you jerkoff I'm going to go see in an hour should be good.[/QUOTE] Not the movies... don't get me wrong, books are great, but the movies always felt...somehow more emo.
[QUOTE=Jack Bryce;16051941]It's not, vampires don't have much of a role in Harry Potter. Which raises a question from me to those who've seen the movie: Is Sanguini (I think that's his name) in the movie? [editline]05:43PM[/editline] who rated me dumb?[/QUOTE] i didnt <.< >.> *rated*
[QUOTE=professional;16053169]I'm surprised this thread hasn't degenerated into musings about how hot emma watson/hermionie is yet... What the fuck, no she's not [img]http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41286000/jpg/_41286732_luna_evanna_big.jpg[/img] If that's hot, I'd hate to see your definition of ugly.[/QUOTE] Hotttt [img]http://www.flixens.com/files/luna_lovegood.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Moby-;16053856]Hotttt [img]http://www.flixens.com/files/luna_lovegood.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Yuck, ugly!
Flat chested... Dude.....
See it is all about "hurr hurr ron I would dig T'AT!" "YEAH DAAAAWG!"
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.