• Firefox - NO MORE THREADS ABOUT FIREFOX POST IN THIS JESUS CHRIST IT'S JUST A BROWSER
    2,402 replies, posted
Awesome. :) [QUOTE=killer89]at least that "memory usage reduction" - thing is more than welcome. My newest FULL version takes almost 300mb of memory, when like.. 4 pages are open.[/QUOTE] [img]http://xs224.xs.to/xs224/08073/firefoxmemory986.png[/img]
It has to have improved from this. [img]http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/5/54/FirefoxStatz.png[/img]
Nice.
[QUOTE=Sheepmang]It has to have improved from this. [img]http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/5/54/FirefoxStatz.png[/img][/QUOTE] What the fuck?
[QUOTE=Xera]Awesome. :) [img]http://xs224.xs.to/xs224/08073/firefoxmemory986.png[/img][/QUOTE] I'm not bullshitting, Firefox acts differently in different hardwares. :argh:
I got it in irish [img]http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/184/irishlv0.jpg[/img] At the moment it's using 8 CPU cycles and 70k of my memory
[B]EDIT:[/B] Works pretty well, the only speed-limiting factor seems to be site traffic usage and my network.
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom]Does this overwrite the normal Firefox version or can I have both? I'm hoping it's just a case of installing it to a different folder.[/QUOTE] Read the beta page.
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom][B]EDIT:[/B] Works pretty well, the only speed-limiting factor seems to be site traffic usage and my network.[/QUOTE] It installs to another folder. It doesn't seem to be much faster, got lots of nifty things though.
Idling at 45mb memory usage with 4 tabs open :4chan:
[QUOTE=Sheepmang]It has to have improved from this. [img]http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/5/54/FirefoxStatz.png[/img][/QUOTE] LOL, uh... That's... strange. Is it photoshopped? Yep, Encyclopedia Dramatica.
I like the neat picture drag effect.
[QUOTE=†-Slash-†]93MB of ram isn't that much, unless you have like, 128MB ram.[/QUOTE] 93 Megabytes, agreeably, is nothing, I have 2 gigabytes.
Looks to be an improvement. I'm glad it'll be eating less Ram, too.
[IMG]http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t315/novemberdobby/dd-1.png[/IMG] Good start. Also, we've had the picture drag effect for a very, very long time ;)
Neat-o [img]http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/9356/betalolum5.jpg[/img]
It does seem to go faster. Edit - A lot faster.
Although I'm no nerd, I've noticed nothing special. I can't compare the two, because the FireFox beta has taken over my PC. No matter what I click, I get the new version. Perhaps I shouldn't have installed it to Mozilla Firefox\Mozilla Firefox 3.0 Beta 3 ..? It'll do for me until it comes out of beta, anyway.
Opera is still faster for me.
It goes a lot faster, no need for Fasterfox now.
What I don't like in FF2 is the freezing when starting a download. [b]Edit:[/b] Lol the distrib exe is 6.66Mb. [b]Edit:[/b] So I installed Firefox 3 Beta 3. It's slower than Firefox 2. At least, for me.
Thanks for the information, seems pretty good so far.
Firefox's memory usage has never been an issue for me. I leave the same instance running for months at a time.
Oshi, i'm on it right now and it's mighty fast!
[QUOTE=Xera]Awesome. :) [img]http://xs224.xs.to/xs224/08073/firefoxmemory986.png[/img][/QUOTE] HAHAHA!!! YOUR NAME IS JAME!!! :excited:
Mhh smart bookmarks. [b]Edit:[/b] [QUOTE=magicman]HAHAHA!!! YOUR NAME IS JAME!!! :excited:[/QUOTE] Jamie :eng101: And now guess my name!
Great, None of my extensions are working again. I miss Stumble Upon :(
[QUOTE=Yo Daddy]Great, None of my extensions are working again. I miss Stumble Upon :([/QUOTE] Works for me.
Adblock plus isn't supported :uhoh:
[QUOTE=i_speel_good]Adblock plus isn't supported :uhoh:[/QUOTE] It works for me, try updating it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.