Post the ugliest cars you can think of V4 - Kill me edition
880 replies, posted
[QUOTE=bradley;42641992]Agreed, that's FAR from ugly. It's much more in the "cute" category.[/QUOTE]
It's in the "incredibly weird yet strangely awesome" category for me.
Reminds me of a Hyundai Genesis. From the front it's not terrible, a little flashy though. From the back, that spoiler is awful.
[QUOTE=Van-man;42642381]It's in the "incredibly weird yet strangely awesome" category for me.[/QUOTE]
There was one for sale in mid-west-Norway a while ago and if I had the money then, I'd fucking buy it in a heartbeat.
It's a rear boxer engined 4wd mini-minibus, what's not to love?
Ssangyong Kyron. Just awful.
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/77/Ssangyong_Kyron_black_h.jpg/895px-Ssangyong_Kyron_black_h.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=twatbagg;42651075]Ssangyong Kyron. Just awful.
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/77/Ssangyong_Kyron_black_h.jpg/895px-Ssangyong_Kyron_black_h.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
I don't think ssangyong has 1 good looking car
[QUOTE=Eddie;42651288]I don't think ssangyong has 1 good looking car[/QUOTE]
The Musso looks sorta cool.
[img]http://parkers.bauercdn.com/Images/Cache/Archive/325x0/SsangYong/Musso/Musso.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=twatbagg;42651075]Ssangyong Kyron. Just awful.
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/77/Ssangyong_Kyron_black_h.jpg/895px-Ssangyong_Kyron_black_h.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Godfuckingdamnit those mismatched taillights are starting to piss me off. Probably because of a bit of OCD or some shit, but seriously? What's the use of making only 3 backup lights? judging from that design, it would cost less to have 4.
[QUOTE=Biaxailemperor;42655656]Godfuckingdamnit those mismatched taillights are starting to piss me off. Probably because of a bit of OCD or some shit, but seriously? What's the use of making only 3 backup lights? judging from that design, it would cost less to have 4.[/QUOTE]
Two of them are turn signals.
The white light on the right is the reverse light, and the red light on the left is the rear fog-light.
[IMG]http://www.grand-limo.ru/upload/resize_cache/2545big.jpg[/IMG]
What the shit?
[QUOTE=Biaxailemperor;42660876][IMG]http://www.grand-limo.ru/upload/resize_cache/2545big.jpg[/IMG]
What the shit?[/QUOTE]
They've just replaced the traditional horses with mechanical ones :v:
[QUOTE=Ldesu;42661200]They've just replaced the traditional horses with mechanical ones :v:[/QUOTE]
If that's the case, they're doing it wrong! This is how it should be done:
[IMG]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8526/8593414011_f12c8c0b13_b.jpg[/IMG]
[img]http://www.perthhummer.com.au/wp-content/gallery/perth-hammer-specification/perth-hummer-limo-specs01.jpg[/img]
[img]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Y9fUniC3Xy8/TiZ3RGrQZLI/AAAAAAAAB_o/eOQZZQuE4Oo/s1600/hummer-limousine-2.jpg[/img]
why
like seriously why
I saw one the other day and it just looked so fucking stupid
[editline]27th October 2013[/editline]
normal limos are bad enough but fucking christ
I like seeing poorly made ones where there is like the extension mark or chop mark
[IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C1fWfx5tkco/UDt48ZR8rBI/AAAAAAAABis/VOK_zfOYagI/s1600/6.jpg[/IMG]
WHY DO I KEEP ON FINDING THESE? :suicide:
[QUOTE=Biaxailemperor;42672605][IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C1fWfx5tkco/UDt48ZR8rBI/AAAAAAAABis/VOK_zfOYagI/s1600/6.jpg[/IMG]
WHY DO I KEEP ON FINDING THESE? :suicide:[/QUOTE]
Horrific memories...
[video=youtube;nUZIPimu2vk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUZIPimu2vk[/video]
No car deserves such treatment.
[sp]I'm going to try my best to stop posting Chryslers for a while[/sp]
That got me laughin pretty hard, no lie.
for those of you who know who devin hester is, this is his car. i used to see it all the time in high school
[img]http://celebritycarz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/img0051ld4.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=God of Ashes;42683119]for those of you who know who devin hester is, this is his car. i used to see it all the time in high school
[img]http://celebritycarz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/img0051ld4.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
If you replaced the wheels and tires it could actually off road better than the majority of modern so-called SUVs.
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;42683271]If you replaced the wheels and tires it could actually off road better than the majority of modern so-called SUVs.[/QUOTE]
Most "SUVs" aren't even actual SUVs anymore, man. They're just minivans with less interior space and front-hinged rear doors, and the few "true" SUVs still in production are usually too big to be any real use off-road. It sucks.
[QUOTE=Biaxailemperor;42684225]Most "SUVs" aren't even actual SUVs anymore, man. They're just minivans with less interior space and front-hinged rear doors, and the few "true" SUVs still in production are usually too big to be any real use off-road. It sucks.[/QUOTE]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/2002-2005_Ford_Explorer_--_06-16-2011.jpg[/t]
RIP SUV, 1963-~2015
[editline]29th October 2013[/editline]
But, more on topic of ugly (Above is not ugly, it is handsome, dammit!)
[img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/2013-ford-c-max-hybrid-fd.jpg[/img]
Look at this bullshit. They tried to do the aston martin grille thing from the Fusion, but completely utterly fucked up. The second grille can NOT be on top of the aston one. It completely ruins the lines of the car. It's also too tall for how long it is, and the curve of the roofline is far too sharp.
[img]http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/crop/499x340+146+25/resize/628x417!/format/jpg/quality/85/http://hss-prod.hss.aol.com/hss/storage/adam/e8f32c2425fdb9b952508eb09473f7f/2015-mercedes-benz-c-class-00-1.jpg[/img]
So this is supposedly the new C-Class. I thought BMW was being weird by making all their new cars look exactly the same, but this looks a [i]little[/i] bit too much like the S-class
Man, that just looks like a Maybach with a shorter ass-end. Now I'm no fan of Mercedes(not today anyway, their older cars look MUCH nicer) but if I were that would be a major turn-off for me. It reminds me of Ford's "blobby" era of design around the late '90s and early '00s just a little too much.
[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;42690780][img]http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/crop/499x340+146+25/resize/628x417!/format/jpg/quality/85/http://hss-prod.hss.aol.com/hss/storage/adam/e8f32c2425fdb9b952508eb09473f7f/2015-mercedes-benz-c-class-00-1.jpg[/img]
So this is supposedly the new C-Class. I thought BMW was being weird by making all their new cars look exactly the same, but this looks a [i]little[/i] bit too much like the S-class[/QUOTE]
I'd like to see some sources on the picture, literally looks like a shrunk down S-class (which is lovely, may I add).
[editline]edit[/editline]
You sure it's not just a concept? All I can find from Mercedes is that the 2014 C-class is going to look exactly the same as the 2013 model, except for some minor tweaks.
The grille looks far too big.
[QUOTE=Jackpody;42702873]I'd like to see some sources on the picture, literally looks like a shrunk down S-class (which is lovely, may I add).
[editline]edit[/editline]
You sure it's not just a concept? All I can find from Mercedes is that the 2014 C-class is going to look exactly the same as the 2013 model, except for some minor tweaks.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.autoblog.com/2013/10/29/2015-mercedes-c-class-images-leak/[/url]
I will admit it's not the [i]best[/i] source in the world, but they have several pictures which seem pretty legit.
[img]http://www2.diariomotor.com/imagenes/2013/10/posts/Clase-C-2015-Elegance-IL-1024x494.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.diariomotor.com/imagenes/2013/10/Clase-C-2015-Airmatic-1024x503.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;42684316][t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/2002-2005_Ford_Explorer_--_06-16-2011.jpg[/t]
RIP SUV, 1963-~2015
[editline]29th October 2013[/editline]
But, more on topic of ugly (Above is not ugly, it is handsome, dammit!)
[img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/2013-ford-c-max-hybrid-fd.jpg[/img]
Look at this bullshit. They tried to do the aston martin grille thing from the Fusion, but completely utterly fucked up. The second grille can NOT be on top of the aston one. It completely ruins the lines of the car. It's also too tall for how long it is, and the curve of the roofline is far too sharp.[/QUOTE]
explorer has been fwd for a few years.
and have u seen the c max in person, it looks like a van, kinda tall ugly. but it was to compete with the Prius v, the cmax also had a lawsuit cause it did not reach the advertised mpg of 47/47/47 city/highway/combined and was rerated to 45/40/43 city highway combined.
[QUOTE=thattaco;42709559]explorer has been fwd for a few years.[/QUOTE]
No it hasn't. The Edge XL has been FWD for several years. The explorer ended production in 2010. The reason I chose the explorer is because it's a good looking SUV in that generation, and the reason I said ~2015 is because I predict that the government regulations will likely kill off the rest of the midsize SUVs.
Saw one of these today, it looks so sad...
[T]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Ford_StreetKa_blue_hr.jpg[/T]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
