Post the ugliest cars you can think of V4 - Kill me edition - General

[QUOTE=Linnone;44571939][IMG]http://img.netcarshow.com/Dodge-Charger_2015_1600x1200_wallpaper_02.jpg[/IMG] Oh god, I just found this and it looks even worse than the 2012 Charger. No, really. [B]Edit:[/B] ..Really? You're disagreeing for no reason on this car. It's just an opinion not a fact.[/QUOTE] To understand Dodge, you must understand that Dodge is in a niche market. Dodges are for children who don't know what refinement means and that plus bonkers and unthrifty engines is why Dodge is cool, and why Dodge is the most charismatic car brand in the United States. It is a car that speaks to everyones inner child... Anyways: [t]http://www.benzblogger.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2014-Mercedes-Benz-E-Class-sedan.jpg[/t] The stock and sport pack 2014 E-Classes are very nice cars though they should have refreshed the interiors, if I could get a 2014, I would get an E350 wagon because wagons are cool.... But then there is this: [t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/roadtests/sedans/1302_2014_mercedes_benz_e63_amg_first_drive/43263499/2014-Mercedes-Benz-E63-AMG-front-three-quarter-3.jpg[/t] I like most of the car, but that front bumper looks tacky and from some angles it looks like it is meant to eat possums that fall onto the roadway as you pass under their perch in the trees. [t]http://photo.netcarshow.com/Mercedes-Benz-E63_AMG_Wagon_2012_photo_01.jpg[/t] The pre-facelift E63 is better

This thing. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubooCt_D3oE[/media]

[QUOTE=Mr. Zombie;44474655]I can't think of a single car that looks good slammed. It's not even a good sounding word to use, either. Sounds rough.[/QUOTE] what about the cima/q45 [t]http://g35driver.com/forums/attachments/other-cars/158779d1367289081-1997-vip-infiniti-q45-y33-cima-920531_10201223871828193_901544019_o.jpg[/t]

BMW X6 [t]http://betterparts.org/images/bmw-x6-01.jpg[/t] [t]http://www.picturesnew.com/media/images/bmw-x6-side-rear.jpg[/t]

Since I'm in Europe at the moment, I'll post what I've seen so far: The Citroen Jumper, along with the 8 other brands it's sold under [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Citroën_Jumper_II_front.JPG[/IMG] And the Fiat Multipla [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e0/Fiat_Multipla_silver_front.JPG[/IMG]

Could you please make those pictures a bit bigger? They're kinda hard to see when they are so tiny

Saw this in a CVS parking lot a few weeks ago. [url]http://imgur.com/a/UoXkt[/url]

[QUOTE=ToasterCat;45286582]Saw this in a CVS parking lot a few weeks ago. [url]http://imgur.com/a/UoXkt[/url][/QUOTE] A girl that goes to the same gym as me has eyelashes on her Fiat 500 It's absolutely perfect for her since she's all cutesy and cudly and stuff, but I bet her boyfriend puts a bag on his head whenever he gets out of it.

SNIPPITY SNIP SNIP

[QUOTE=Zotobom;44517262]I love concept cars,but [IMG]http://www.tuvie.com/wp-content/uploads/moville-peugeot-competition-car-concept2.jpg[/IMG] peugeot what the hell[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://www.diseno-art.com/images/peugeot-20cup_side.jpg[/IMG] so they brought back the 20CUP as the 20DROP glad to see them keeping the drink theme alive

[IMG]http://www.utepprintstore.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/2013-Ford-Super-Duty-Platinum-6.jpg[/IMG] Is it just me or does that oxidized aluminum look band on the gate make it look like someone pulled the piece out of a junkyard and never painted it? I also think all Fords, truck or car, are ugly as hell from the front. The "We'll make it look a bit like an aston martin to boost sales" really seemed to work on a lot of mindless idiots.

[QUOTE=cyclohexanol;45312950][IMG]http://www.utepprintstore.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/2013-Ford-Super-Duty-Platinum-6.jpg[/IMG] Is it just me or does that [I]anodized[/I] aluminum look band on the gate make it look like someone pulled the piece out of a junkyard and never painted it? I also think all Fords, truck or car, are ugly as hell from the front. The "We'll make it look a bit like an aston martin to boost sales" really seemed to work on a lot of mindless idiots.[/QUOTE] FIFY And the Fusion doesn't look half bad

[QUOTE=cyclohexanol;45312950][IMG]http://www.utepprintstore.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/2013-Ford-Super-Duty-Platinum-6.jpg[/IMG] Is it just me or does that oxidized aluminum look band on the gate make it look like someone pulled the piece out of a junkyard and never painted it? I also think all Fords, truck or car, are ugly as hell from the front. The "We'll make it look a bit like an aston martin to boost sales" really seemed to work on a lot of mindless idiots.[/QUOTE] Yes I think the platinum edition plate looks bad on the F-series, but I think Ford makes the best looking trucks at the moment, and the best looking cars, too. And the best looking crossovers except the escape and flex, which are pretty damn ugly. At least in the domestic market they do. In my opinion, of course.

[QUOTE=Trekintosh;45313141]Yes I think the platinum edition plate looks bad on the F-series, but I think Ford makes the best looking trucks at the moment, and the best looking cars, too. And the best looking crossovers except the escape and flex, which are pretty damn ugly. At least in the domestic market they do. In my opinion, of course.[/QUOTE] [I]I think you need to get your eyes checked...[/I]

[QUOTE=cyclohexanol;45312950]I also think all Fords, truck or car, are ugly as hell from the front. The "We'll make it look a bit like an aston martin to boost sales" really seemed to work on a lot of mindless idiots.[/QUOTE] They're just getting back at Aston Martin for copying the Mustang in the 70s [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/1979_Aston_Martin_V8_Volante_Series_1_front.jpg/1024px-1979_Aston_Martin_V8_Volante_Series_1_front.jpg[/img] [img]http://images.thecarconnection.com/lrg/1977-ford-mustang-ii_100179505_l.jpg[/img]

By that logic all cars in the 70s were copying each other. They look nothing like each other.

[QUOTE=Slithers;45313239][I]I think you need to get your eyes checked...[/I][/QUOTE] Who is making better looking cars in the domestic market, then? Chevrolet? Ha! Besides the Camaro and Vette, they are as boring looking as can be. Chrysler/Dodge is the only contender, and that's just because of the charger, which they actually ruined with the new version, so they don't even have that anymore. The 300C is nice too, actually, so they have that. The rest is pretty generic looking. The Fords are all extremely unique looking, very hard to lose in a parking lot.

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;45313461]They're just getting back at Aston Martin for copying the Mustang in the 70s [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/1979_Aston_Martin_V8_Volante_Series_1_front.jpg/1024px-1979_Aston_Martin_V8_Volante_Series_1_front.jpg[/img] [img]http://images.thecarconnection.com/lrg/1977-ford-mustang-ii_100179505_l.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Whether they copied or not, that Aston looks far, far, far better. Besides the turd brown, obviously.

[QUOTE=Trekintosh;45313553]Who is making better looking cars in the domestic market, then? Chevrolet? Ha! Besides the Camaro and Vette, they are as boring looking as can be. Chrysler/Dodge is the only contender, and that's just because of the charger, which they actually ruined with the new version, so they don't even have that anymore. The 300C is nice too, actually, so they have that. The rest is pretty generic looking. The Fords are all extremely unique looking, very hard to lose in a parking lot.[/QUOTE] He's talking about the trucks, not the cars

Did someone say "ugly"? [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/Hyundai_Atos_Prime_01.jpg[/IMG] It's every-beeping-where!

[QUOTE=Ldesu;45318177]He's talking about the trucks, not the cars[/QUOTE] He said "...Fords, trucks or cars, are ugly as hell."

[QUOTE=cyclohexanol;45312950][IMG]http://www.utepprintstore.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/2013-Ford-Super-Duty-Platinum-6.jpg[/IMG] Is it just me or does that oxidized aluminum look band on the gate make it look like someone pulled the piece out of a junkyard and never painted it? I also think all Fords, truck or car, [b]are ugly as hell from the front[/b]. The "We'll make it look a bit like an aston martin to boost sales" really seemed to work on a lot of mindless idiots.[/QUOTE] [img]http://v8magazine.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/FPV-Falcon-GT-P-fq-690x460.jpg[/img] Hmmmmmm, obviously this isn't every Ford but yes some are ugly from the front.

[QUOTE=Trekintosh;45313553]Who is making better looking cars in the domestic market, then? Chevrolet? Ha! Besides the Camaro and Vette, they are as boring looking as can be. Chrysler/Dodge is the only contender, and that's just because of the charger, which they actually ruined with the new version, so they don't even have that anymore. The 300C is nice too, actually, so they have that. The rest is pretty generic looking. The Fords are all extremely unique looking, very hard to lose in a parking lot.[/QUOTE] I think Chrysler products look better than Fords. A Durango is better looking and stands out more than an Explorer or Expedition, I don't think Dodge ruined the new Charger, the Viper looks excellent, and if you get the blacktop package on the Avenger or Journey, they both look badass, and then of course there is the Chrysler 300 and the Challenger. The Town & Country and the 200 are bland but that's about it. The only non generic looking cars Ford has are the Fusion, the Taurus( mostly because its ass is too big to miss), and V8 Mustangs. The rest is pretty barebones and people who don't know about cars would have issues separating them from a peasant model Kia or Hyundai. Therefore Chrysler makes the best looking domestic cars, and I'm not gonna bother discussing Chevy since you hit the nail on the head with that.

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;45313461]They're just getting back at Aston Martin for copying the Mustang in the 70s [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/1979_Aston_Martin_V8_Volante_Series_1_front.jpg/1024px-1979_Aston_Martin_V8_Volante_Series_1_front.jpg[/img] [img]http://images.thecarconnection.com/lrg/1977-ford-mustang-ii_100179505_l.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Why did you decide to compare the aston to a mustang 2?

[QUOTE=redsoxrock;45374236]Why did you decide to compare the aston to a mustang 2?[/QUOTE] front lights and bonnet shape i suppose but aston martins ftw.

[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/2009_Spyker_C8_Spyder_fL.jpg/800px-2009_Spyker_C8_Spyder_fL.jpg[/img] So umm where do I start in saying what's wrong with the Spyker C8?

[QUOTE=Antdawg;45392721][img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/2009_Spyker_C8_Spyder_fL.jpg/800px-2009_Spyker_C8_Spyder_fL.jpg[/img] So umm where do I start in saying what's wrong with the Spyker C8?[/QUOTE] You could start with the horrifying amount of chrome that is neither tasteful or worth its cost

Im still scarred from seeing one of these in real life. [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Buick-Skylark-coupe.jpg[/t]

I used to work with a guy who drove one. It's almost so bad its good. Not to say I would be caught dead driving one.

[QUOTE=Del91;45415710]I used to work with a guy who drove one. It's almost so bad its good. Not to say I would be caught dead driving one.[/QUOTE] They're cramped but super comfy. It's like riding on a cloud. The interior materials are surprisingly good for a 90s GM, just the fit-and-finish is atrocious. :v: