Post the ugliest cars you can think of V4 - Kill me edition - General

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;45313461]They're just getting back at Aston Martin for copying the Mustang in the 70s [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/1979_Aston_Martin_V8_Volante_Series_1_front.jpg/1024px-1979_Aston_Martin_V8_Volante_Series_1_front.jpg[/img] [img]http://images.thecarconnection.com/lrg/1977-ford-mustang-ii_100179505_l.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] It looks even more like a mustang with the extra headlights IMHO [IMG]http://trialx.com/curetalk/wp-content/blogs.dir/7/files/2013/03/cars/1979_Aston_Martin_V8-1.jpg[/IMG]

I know this is a model concept car, but the sides of the front bumper bother me because they look like massive kidney stones. [t]http://i.imgur.com/TlkHp92.jpg[/t]

In the age of unnecessary angles that one takes the cake.

The top half is good. But the bumper and....and those [I]tires[/I]....

Looks like something Adam Jensen would drive.

[QUOTE=Duck M.;45480843]Looks like something Adam Jensen would drive.[/QUOTE] Kinda, yeah. I actually want to whip up a 3D model of that thing without the retarded mess of plastic shards that they're calling a bumper there, just to see what it'd look like and maybe even use it in a game.

What...what is it?

Imagine crawling on the ground or something and then getting hit by the sides of that bumper. That thing isn't going past safety tests.

Honestly, I think Ford is the only truck maker which hasn't completely fucked up their design. [t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/roadtests/trucks/1401_2015_ford_f_150_first_look/60473441/2015-ford-f-150-front-side-view-in-snow.jpg[/t][t]http://www.ford.com/resources/ford/general/microsites/f150reveal/assets/gallery/desktop/bridge_2/_bridge2_h5-caribou.jpg[/t][t]http://buyersguide.caranddriver.com/media/assets/submodel/5673.jpg[/t] I mean really just look at the 2015 competition... [t]http://gmauthority.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/2015-chevrolet-silverado-2500-hd-high-country/2015-chevrolet-silverado-2500-hd-high-country-01.jpg[/t][t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/wot/totd-would-you-buy-a-heavy-duty-truck-without-a-diesel-engine-410547/55338941+w644/2015-gmc-sierra-denali-3500hd-front-view.jpg[/t] [t]http://newscarsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2015-Dodge-Ram-Interior.jpg[/t] These were great looking trucks. [t]http://photo.netcarshow.com/Dodge-Ram_1500_Sport_2009_photo_01.jpg[/t][t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/photo_gallery/trucks/1206_2013_chevrolet_silverado_and_silverado_hd_photo_gallery/38693857/2013-chevrolet-silverado-hd-drivers-side-front-view.jpg[/t] American car makers really don't know how to do futuristic and projector headlights, at least the truck designers.

The new Dodge [del]Charger Xl[/del] Durrango [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dvVjibM.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/i6Fr5dE.jpg[/IMG] I just don't like how bulky it got

[QUOTE=Minimole;45483782]The new Dodge [del]Charger Xl[/del] Durrango [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dvVjibM.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/i6Fr5dE.jpg[/IMG] I just don't like how bulky it got[/QUOTE] It looks like a motherfucking tank. I love it.

[QUOTE=slayer3032;45483691]Honestly, I think Ford is the only truck maker which hasn't completely fucked up their design. [t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/roadtests/trucks/1401_2015_ford_f_150_first_look/60473441/2015-ford-f-150-front-side-view-in-snow.jpg[/t][t]http://www.ford.com/resources/ford/general/microsites/f150reveal/assets/gallery/desktop/bridge_2/_bridge2_h5-caribou.jpg[/t][t]http://buyersguide.caranddriver.com/media/assets/submodel/5673.jpg[/t] I mean really just look at the 2015 competition... [t]http://gmauthority.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/2015-chevrolet-silverado-2500-hd-high-country/2015-chevrolet-silverado-2500-hd-high-country-01.jpg[/t][t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/wot/totd-would-you-buy-a-heavy-duty-truck-without-a-diesel-engine-410547/55338941+w644/2015-gmc-sierra-denali-3500hd-front-view.jpg[/t] [t]http://newscarsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2015-Dodge-Ram-Interior.jpg[/t] These were great looking trucks. [t]http://photo.netcarshow.com/Dodge-Ram_1500_Sport_2009_photo_01.jpg[/t][t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/photo_gallery/trucks/1206_2013_chevrolet_silverado_and_silverado_hd_photo_gallery/38693857/2013-chevrolet-silverado-hd-drivers-side-front-view.jpg[/t] American car makers really don't know how to do futuristic and projector headlights, at least the truck designers.[/QUOTE] I dunno. I mean, I like the Fords okay, but I think they're getting too chunky just like the GMs. The Dodge still looks pretty great to me though, since it's got the same form-factor as it has had since '09. The Headlights don't change that for me. [editline]24th July 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Minimole;45483782]The new Dodge [del]Charger Xl[/del] Durrango [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dvVjibM.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/i6Fr5dE.jpg[/IMG] I just don't like how bulky it got[/QUOTE] The Crossover Durango is something of an anomaly for me. On one hand, I love it because it captures the whole 'muscle truck' look that I like, and it looks like a beefier modern Magnum. On the other hand it looks like a modern Jeep Grand Cherokee platform's carrying around a smaller sequoia's body and it heaving under the stress. Not to mention I'm one of the few people who actually liked its predecessor.

[QUOTE=Biaxailemperor;45491341]I dunno. I mean, I like the Fords okay, but I think they're getting too chunky just like the GMs. The Dodge still looks pretty great to me though, since it's got the same form-factor as it has had since '09. The Headlights don't change that for me. [/QUOTE] The only thing I don't like about the fords are the odd headlight shape and the bloated "super-dootie" front end. Everything else about them is pretty solid. The GM's look like someone went full retard with ebay aftermarket shit and added another 1000lbs to it's face as well as squinty asian downs syndrome on the GMC side. [del]The Dodge is indeed still the same body style but the problem is they tacked so much fucking chrome all over it that it looks like someone spent their $2000 cash back on anything they could find on ebay with the word chrome.[/del] It seems more like the headlights have thrown me off on that the grill is the same as the previous ones, well now with the revised headlights and tail lights it just looks all wrong to me. While the headlights themselves are by far an upgrade the grill no longer looks at home next to the headlights and should have been revised. The LED tail lights look like ebay shit with the chrome lip around them and I would swap those out for the previous years before it left the lot.. The increase in the two tone color is also terrible since I mostly see those and it just make the truck look terrible.

I'm okay with most of the new F-150 except the headlights. I think they're atrocious.

I feel like if they followed a concept drawing a little looser on the headlights they could have looked really good. I think that the headlights will age a bit better down the road, we're gonna see some crazy headlight shapes over the next 5 years as everything finally ditches reflectors/halogen for projectors/HID and LED.

I have yet to see a vehicle where I think the projector headlights look good. I'm guessing that wild headlight shapes are going to be manufacturers' attempts to change that.

[t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/oftheyear/suv/1112_2012_suv_of_the_year_land_rover_range_rover_evoque/39092976/2012-land-rover-range-rover-evoque-5-door-rear-view.jpg[/t] That back end makes me want to puke blood. [editline]25th July 2014[/editline] It's not even terribly, overly ugly. Just very ugly, but it makes me mad to think that someone found it so good that they decided having this design is worth sacrificing any kind of visibility out the back. I mean, imagine reversing this thing into a parking space. You'll hardly notice the difference from piloting a submarine.

[QUOTE=Del91;45483349]What...what is it?[/QUOTE] It's a concept car for a "New Mad Max," I believe. Link: [url]http://blog.caranddriver.com/the-next-of-the-v8-interceptors-ford-australia-unveils-new-mad-max-concepts/[/url]

[QUOTE=Minimole;45483782]The new Dodge [del]Charger Xl[/del] Durrango [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dvVjibM.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/i6Fr5dE.jpg[/IMG] I just don't like how bulky it got[/QUOTE] at least they are still rwd layout, unlike the explorer. they are on a stretched grand Cherokee chassis, gc is a 5 passenger, durango is a 7. another note it looks better than this. [t]http://img.autobytel.com/2006/dodge/durango/2-376-oemexteriorfront-41138.jpg[/t] we always called those ogres.

[QUOTE=Don Merino;45494399][t]http://image.motortrend.com/f/oftheyear/suv/1112_2012_suv_of_the_year_land_rover_range_rover_evoque/39092976/2012-land-rover-range-rover-evoque-5-door-rear-view.jpg[/t] That back end makes me want to puke blood. [editline]25th July 2014[/editline] It's not even terribly, overly ugly. Just very ugly, but it makes me mad to think that someone found it so good that they decided having this design is worth sacrificing any kind of visibility out the back. I mean, imagine reversing this thing into a parking space. You'll hardly notice the difference from piloting a submarine.[/QUOTE] Careful now, Garry's got one :v:

[QUOTE=slayer3032;45492227]The only thing I don't like about the fords are the odd headlight shape and the bloated "super-dootie" front end. Everything else about them is pretty solid. The GM's look like someone went full retard with ebay aftermarket shit and added another 1000lbs to it's face as well as squinty asian downs syndrome on the GMC side. [del]The Dodge is indeed still the same body style but the problem is they tacked so much fucking chrome all over it that it looks like someone spent their $2000 cash back on anything they could find on ebay with the word chrome.[/del] It seems more like the headlights have thrown me off on that the grill is the same as the previous ones, well now with the revised headlights and tail lights it just looks all wrong to me. While the headlights themselves are by far an upgrade the grill no longer looks at home next to the headlights and should have been revised. The LED tail lights look like ebay shit with the chrome lip around them and I would swap those out for the previous years before it left the lot.. The increase in the two tone color is also terrible since I mostly see those and it just make the truck look terrible.[/QUOTE] I think the GMC is ugly, my landlord has one in red and I don't like its front end. The new Silverados are nice looking up front if you don't get the higher tier trims. I've never liked how blingy the King Ranch Rams look, I like the projector lights, but on the King Ranch models, they just make it look rapper blingy. What I'm trying to say is that most of the stuff that you are hating is optional equipment that only morons buy.

The problem is when there is some optional equipment you [I]really[/I] want/require and it's only available as part of a package with some shit you [I]really[/I] don't. Often the only one available on the lot with the gear you want is a Platinum/King Ranch/Whatever GM does. For example, my mom really needs the tailgate step in our F-150, and she really wanted a V8, so she got the only one on the lot with it and a 5.0, a Lariat. She didn't need the interior or navigation, but it was cheaper to get it in the high trim level than order one from the factory with just what she wanted.

[QUOTE=Slithers;45502669]I think the GMC is ugly, my landlord has one in red and I don't like its front end. The new Silverados are nice looking up front if you don't get the higher tier trims. I've never liked how blingy the King Ranch Rams look, I like the projector lights, but on the King Ranch models, they just make it look rapper blingy. What I'm trying to say is that most of the stuff that you are hating is optional equipment that only morons buy.[/QUOTE] I haven't seen a Chevy IRL which doesn't look similar to that and the GMC just looks pants on head retarded sadly. Sure it has a bunch of optional bits on it but if they just stuffed projectors in the previous model it would have looked amazing. The Dodge has had the lines in the front end changed, I like my buddy's mom's like 2010 Hemi truck but the new ones just look cheaper/aftermarket/ebay.

[QUOTE=slayer3032;45503737]The Dodge has had the lines in the front end changed, I like my buddy's mom's like 2010 Hemi truck but the new ones just look cheaper/aftermarket/ebay.[/QUOTE] I'm not disputing the GMCs retardedness The only thing changed with the Dodge is the bottom half of the grille, which was changed for 2014 2014 on the left, 2010 on the right: [t]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/30-2013-ram-1500-crew-fd.jpg[/t][t]http://pictures.dealer.com/k/kengarffwestvalleypreowned/1729/d66386a44046387201d4e49a99c5492f.jpg[/t]

[QUOTE=Bisharp;45318621]Did someone say "ugly"? [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/Hyundai_Atos_Prime_01.jpg[/IMG] It's every-beeping-where![/QUOTE] Funny that you get a picture from one in Portugal... BECAUSE THEY REALLY ARE EVERYWHERE

[QUOTE=Slithers;45505603]I'm not disputing the GMCs retardedness The only thing changed with the Dodge is the bottom half of the grille, which was changed for 2014 2014 on the left, 2010 on the right: [t]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/30-2013-ram-1500-crew-fd.jpg[/t][t]http://pictures.dealer.com/k/kengarffwestvalleypreowned/1729/d66386a44046387201d4e49a99c5492f.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] Have they discontinued both of those grills because they look vastly different than the one I've seen on every single projector equipped Ram. [t]http://newscarsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2015-Dodge-Ram-Interior.jpg[/t] This hideous chrome mess of a grill is the only one I've seen on the new trucks, both of the ones you pictured look great on the truck but they aren't the newest year with the projectors?

[QUOTE=slayer3032;45507676]Have they discontinued both of those grills because they look vastly different than the one I've seen on every single projector equipped Ram. [t]http://newscarsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2015-Dodge-Ram-Interior.jpg[/t] This hideous chrome mess of a grill is the only one I've seen on the new trucks, both of the ones you pictured look great on the truck but they aren't the newest year with the projectors?[/QUOTE] Sigh... Projectors are still optional, they have been optional since 2012. The trucks you keep posting are King Ranch 2500 models....only the King Ranch models get that over the top mesh grille

[QUOTE=Slithers;45511140]Sigh... Projectors are still optional, they have been optional since 2012. The trucks you keep posting are King Ranch 2500 models....only the King Ranch models get that over the top mesh grille[/QUOTE] I don't mind the projectors, projectors are a good thing. I just was saying that they look like shit paired with the grill. Oh, I haven't seen a new model ram which doesn't have projectors and that grill. Wasn't aware both are options.

Projectors aren't a good thing in hilly areas. Since they're brighter than normal halogens, but more focused(as far as I can tell), when someone with them crests a hill in front of you, it really blinds you.

Oh no now some people are going to be complaining about HIDs even in projectors :v: