Post the ugliest cars you can think of V4 - Kill me edition

[opaali]

Looked at nettiauto.com, used 2014 dodge rams seem to be from 52k€ to 83k€ ($62k to $104k)

[Adam1172]

I am happy that somewhere out there some other countries feel my pain when it comes to car prices.

We dont have dodge rams to compare but a baseline Fiesta Hatch costs $15k in the US, while in Malaysia we'd have to fork out around Rm80k or US$25k.

And it gets more expensive with higher displacement.

Hell the US price for a 2015 Camaro SS ($25k) is chump change, considering a 2011 Used Camaro SS here costs ($110k).

Its much more fucked up considering we have a much lower income rate when compared to scandanavian countries.

[highlight] Anyway back on topic [/highlight]

[b][i][u]You thought those priuses were ugly?[/b][/i][/u]

[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2016_Toyota_Fuel_Cell_Vehicle_031-e1416282630824-850x441.jpg[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2016_Toyota_Fuel_Cell_Vehicle_033-e1416282852181-850x413.jpg[/img]

Its called the Mirai and it runs on hydrogen. Honda is expected to follow up with a probably cheaper and equally ugly car.

[editline]19th November 2014[/editline]

Also,

Toyota Camry 2015 : Mid-life crisis edition

[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2015_Toyota_Camry_012-850x504.jpg[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2015_Toyota_Camry_008-850x447.jpg[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2015_Toyota_Camry_003-e1397709598737-850x424.jpg[/img]

What the fuck Toyota, ever since they decided its a fucking good idea to make all their their future cars flowy ans shit like on the FT-1, half the design team wants something subtle with class and the other half wants RAWRRRRR ANGRY BUMPER ANGRIER HEADLIGHTS RAWR.

[Rocâ„¢]

RAWR ANGRY BUMPER TOYOTA SMASH

and then it has tiny little feet.

Why do they make aggressive looking cars and then give them shitty engines and make them crappy sedans?

[thattaco]

[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;46522180]RAWR ANGRY BUMPER TOYOTA SMASH

and then it has tiny little feet.

Why do they make aggressive looking cars and then give them shitty engines and make them crappy sedans?[/QUOTE]
so a 2gr 3.5l at 268 hp on 87octance is crappy?

[Slithers]

[QUOTE=thattaco;46526191]so a 2gr 3.5l at 268 hp on 87octance is crappy?[/QUOTE]

In a Camry, yes. They've had that V6 for years and it doesn't make more power than it previously did. I wouldn't be caught dead in a Camry, and the same can be said about a lot of my friends.

[Saber15]

[QUOTE=adam1172;46520486]

[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2016_Toyota_Fuel_Cell_Vehicle_031-e1416282630824-850x441.jpg[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2016_Toyota_Fuel_Cell_Vehicle_033-e1416282852181-850x413.jpg[/img]
[/QUOTE]

It's like the LFA's obese cousin.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Lexus_LFA_001.JPG[/t]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e0/Lexus_LFA_009a.JPG[/t]

[Drury]

[QUOTE=JesseR92;46437671]Read through the entire thread and I am dissapointed it hasnt been posted yet but pleased i can post it,

[img]http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jQfbc2dA6YI/hqdefault.jpg[/img]

To get an idea about how rediculous the thing actually was this video is better

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00pxJAH9iUQ&feature=player_detailpage[/media]

The thing is ridiculous.[/QUOTE]

I bet it runs on lemonade and the pistons are plastic cups.

[Im Not A Geek]

[QUOTE=adam1172;46520486]I am happy that somewhere out there some other countries feel my pain when it comes to car prices.

We dont have dodge rams to compare but a baseline Fiesta Hatch costs $15k in the US, while in Malaysia we'd have to fork out around Rm80k or US$25k.

And it gets more expensive with higher displacement.

Hell the US price for a 2015 Camaro SS ($25k) is chump change, considering a 2011 Used Camaro SS here costs ($110k).

Its much more fucked up considering we have a much lower income rate when compared to scandanavian countries.

[highlight] Anyway back on topic [/highlight]

[b][i][u]You thought those priuses were ugly?[/b][/i][/u]

[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2016_Toyota_Fuel_Cell_Vehicle_031-e1416282630824-850x441.jpg[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2016_Toyota_Fuel_Cell_Vehicle_033-e1416282852181-850x413.jpg[/img]

Its called the Mirai and it runs on hydrogen. Honda is expected to follow up with a probably cheaper and equally ugly car.

[editline]19th November 2014[/editline]

Also,

Toyota Camry 2015 : Mid-life crisis edition

[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2015_Toyota_Camry_012-850x504.jpg[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2015_Toyota_Camry_008-850x447.jpg[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32814946/2015_Toyota_Camry_003-e1397709598737-850x424.jpg[/img]

What the fuck Toyota, ever since they decided its a fucking good idea to make all their their future cars flowy ans shit like on the FT-1, half the design team wants something subtle with class and the other half wants RAWRRRRR ANGRY BUMPER ANGRIER HEADLIGHTS RAWR.[/QUOTE]

Ewwwwwww...........................

[Rocâ„¢]

[QUOTE=thattaco;46526191]so a 2gr 3.5l at 268 hp on 87octance is crappy?[/QUOTE]

That thing makes 268hp? Why?

[Zotobom]

[t]https://edinburgheafs.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/imgcitroen20c61.jpg[/t]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Citro%C3%ABn_C6_front_20100327.jpg/1920px-Citro%C3%ABn_C6_front_20100327.jpg[/t]
the Citroën C6 is gross

[turke]

The back window is cool as Fuck. Too bad they sold like 3 cars. They offered just the same as their competitors for less, but nobody wants to spend that much money on a Citroen either way

[Zotobom]

[QUOTE=rampageturke 2;46569516]The back window is cool as Fuck. Too bad they sold like 3 cars. They offered just the same as their competitors for less, but nobody wants to spend that much money on a Citroen either way[/QUOTE]

Well yeah,nothing wrong with those windows and the car itself is probably fine but those disgusting taillights though

[thattaco]

[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;46558808]That thing makes 268hp? Why?[/QUOTE]

why not?
15 camry v6 se 14.2 seconds quarter-mile at 100.6 mph while rated at 31 mpg highway.

every drove a se? stiffer suspension better valved shocks/struts, thicker sway bars.
i had an 07 se trd suspension/ trd wheels/ trd rear sway bar. turn off t/c and it was tail happy quick sedan.

i dont understand why someone would bash a car and they have never drove it.

[Rocâ„¢]

[QUOTE=thattaco;46571535]why not?
15 camry v6 se 14.2 seconds quarter-mile at 100.6 mph while rated at 31 mpg highway.

every drove a se? stiffer suspension better valved shocks/struts, thicker sway bars.
i had an 07 se trd suspension/ trd wheels/ trd rear sway bar. turn off t/c and it was tail happy quick sedan.

i dont understand why someone would bash a car and they have never drove it.[/QUOTE]

Because it sounds like a car trying to be one thing and not being able to reach its dreams.

[clutch2]

I can appreciate what Toyota, heck all the car companies that are doing it, is trying to do.. but goddamn all these 'futuristic' stylings are getting awful. I'm all about that Toyota life.. but holy fuck keep me away from anything like 2006 or newer unless it's a Lexus, or maaaaybe a Camry up to 2011. Everything's gotten more 'dull' feeling for the extension of 'luxury'.

Let me tell you something about crappy feeling click wheels;
[img]http://pictures.dealer.com/t/toyotakeene/1019/1619b34940463872015ad36d4efcd663.jpg[/img]
Those two just below the screen embody the name.

[Slithers]

[QUOTE=clutch2;46576834]I can appreciate what Toyota, heck all the car companies that are doing it, is trying to do.. but goddamn all these 'futuristic' stylings are getting awful. I'm all about that Toyota life.. but holy fuck keep me away from anything like 2006 or newer unless it's a Lexus, or maaaaybe a Camry up to 2011. Everything's gotten more 'dull' feeling for the extension of 'luxury'.

Let me tell you something about crappy feeling click wheels;
[img]http://pictures.dealer.com/t/toyotakeene/1019/1619b34940463872015ad36d4efcd663.jpg[/img]
Those two just below the screen embody the name.[/QUOTE]

I couldn't stand to drive a Camry, I feel like I'm gonna break the click dials every time I use em in my moms Tundra. I don't think I could drive anything consistently that isn't a real luxury car tbh.

[ToasterCat]

[url]http://s.taobao.com/search?q=%B5%E7%B6%AF+%BD%CE%B3%B5&tab=all&bcoffset=2&s=0[/url]
just anything on that site
/shudders

[Rocâ„¢]

[img]http://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/vehicles-sale-lsx-powered-only/144597d1219384432-2000-camaro-z28-ss-28k-miles-01.jpg[/img]
how is this a camaro?

[Saber15]

[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;46678899][img]http://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/vehicles-sale-lsx-powered-only/144597d1219384432-2000-camaro-z28-ss-28k-miles-01.jpg[/img]
how is this a camaro?[/QUOTE]

[t]http://i.imgur.com/Ij5mWsG.jpg[/t][t]http://i.imgur.com/3J01Vgb.jpg[/t][t]http://i.imgur.com/o7TCj4e.jpg[/t]

[TheAdmiester]

The new CTS-V has been revealed and god it looks terrible.

[img]http://www.topgear.com/uk/imageresize/image.jpg?OriginalImageUrl=%2fuk%2fassets%2fcms%2f9e6fb72e-f54e-4029-88c5-83972f2ec69e%2fLarge+Image+5.jpg%3fp%3d141222_09%3a56&Width=615&Height=347[/img]

I think in a few years time the headlights will actually be separate from the car, hanging off the sides while the entire front end is just a grille.

[Rævskjegg]

I think it looks pretty good.

There are far far worse cars in the world

[Spectre1406]

-snip-

[Zotobom]

I like how the newer CTS-V's look but the first one looks horrible IMO. Just bland.
[IMG]http://www.hot.ee/m/megacars/cadillac_cts_2001_01_m.jpg[/IMG]
No idea why,it just looks...off.

[Jackpody]

I honestly always thought those CTS Cadillacs looked a bit like a modern interpretation of the W114 / W115 Mercedes. The tall headlights and the space between headlight and grille just looks somewhat alike.
[t]http://www.w114-115.org.pl/j/images/stories/strona_glowna/start03.jpg[/t]

[Slithers]

[QUOTE=TheAdmiester;46771482]The new CTS-V has been revealed and god it looks terrible.

[img]http://www.topgear.com/uk/imageresize/image.jpg?OriginalImageUrl=%2fuk%2fassets%2fcms%2f9e6fb72e-f54e-4029-88c5-83972f2ec69e%2fLarge+Image+5.jpg%3fp%3d141222_09%3a56&Width=615&Height=347[/img]

I think in a few years time the headlights will actually be separate from the car, hanging off the sides while the entire front end is just a grille.[/QUOTE]

Hardly ugly, you wanna see ugly? Go look at a Mercedes E350 please

[Spectre1406]

[Img]http://www.dreamcarsite.com/photos/cars01/2015-felino-cb7-canada/felino-cb7-grey-h.JPG[/img]

canadians have yet to apologize for this car

[TheAdmiester]

[QUOTE=Slithers;46804380]Hardly ugly, you wanna see ugly? Go look at a Mercedes E350 please[/QUOTE]

Looks perfectly fine to me. Far better than the Cadillac at least.
[img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/2010e350coupereview_lead1.jpg[/img]

[Dr. Darkly]

is it bad that i like how most of the cars in this thread look

[IMG]http://assets.carbuzz.co.uk/blog/Ssangyong%2Bkorrando.jpg[/IMG]

[Rocâ„¢]

[QUOTE=Zotobom;46798695]I like how the newer CTS-V's look but the first one looks horrible IMO. Just bland.
[IMG]http://www.hot.ee/m/megacars/cadillac_cts_2001_01_m.jpg[/IMG]
No idea why,it just looks...off.[/QUOTE]

I'd say its the shutters grill and everything around it being dull as fuck.

[ToastedBread]

[QUOTE=DarklytheGreat;46814123]is it bad that i like how most of the cars in this thread look

[IMG]http://assets.carbuzz.co.uk/blog/Ssangyong%2Bkorrando.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

I actually like that...