Which Pixar film should have a sequel (that doesn't have one yet)?

[Carne]

[QUOTE=DragonGenX;22728846]I wanna see them do that Newt movie first.

[editline]12:18AM[/editline]

I also always got Bug's life Ants mixed up because ants were main characters.[/QUOTE]

Well, the Newt movie was canceled though.

[Mexican]

[QUOTE=mr.crowbar;22719776][img_thumb]http://www.scottchiu.com/screenshots_files/Box_IN2_LG.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]

Cheap video games made only as merchandise aren't canon.

[DOG-GY]

[QUOTE=HellNaw;22692878]Wall E, the rest sucked.[/QUOTE]
hey shitty poster/faggot

nobody likes your meme avatar 4channer

[SKuM]

[QUOTE=BmB;22704049]Because it sucks. It's the only Pixar film I remember not liking actually. It's like for one precious, twisted ass backwards moment Pixar were making a bad generic flick while Dreamworks was doing something [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antz"]good[/url].[/QUOTE]

This! This this this this this!

"Antz" vs "A Bugs Life" is the only time in history where the Dreamworks version of a movie was better than the Pixar version. Except for maybe Shrek, but there's no Pixar adaptation for that.

[rammaster]

I'd rather see "Newt" be put back into production than putting in time for another sequel for any of those movies. But anyways, I voted Incredibles.

[commander204]

Wall-E, I wanna know how the kidz look like from 2 700 year old robots! xD

[Awegner]

Incredibles remided me of tf2. I liked the way the characters had their own shape and complex characteristics.

[POLOPOZOZO]

[QUOTE=prettyprincess;22687604]Honestly, they all ended pretty well. I'd like to see more originals than sequels tbh.[/QUOTE]

Yes this is the best answer too bad that it isn't a poll option.