• Close-up of 20mm Gatling Gun Shooting Down a Missile
    70 replies, posted
The phalanx shootin loads. How very appropriate
[QUOTE=yurbuttstinks;38605019]The phalanx shootin loads. How very appropriate[/QUOTE] I don't get it.
First video, at 0:25 "I think I have a boner"
[QUOTE=munchito696;38192654]The system can auto correct it's aim by tracking its own bullets too, it's called continuous aim correction, or CAC[/QUOTE] so is it theoretically possible to get two of these and tell them to shoot down eachothers bullets? :v:
[QUOTE=Olas;38167838]A better use would be to drop these in enemy territory and have they spin around in 360 degrees firing millions of bullets in every direction. Nobody would be safe.[/QUOTE] yeah because bombs are less effective and less expensive than a anti-missile gatling gun
-snip fuck everything-
[QUOTE=_Maverick_;38527003]how would a COMPUTER tell the deference between a NK troop who is attacking or a NK troop who is defecting?[/QUOTE] no prisoners no defectors no survivors no mercy
[QUOTE=Joazzz;38611058]no prisoners no defectors no survivors no mercy[/QUOTE] get your communist shit off my american freedom
[QUOTE=0FucksGiven;38610996]It doesn't take much mental power or capacity to understand what he meant. When you invite someone over to your house you probably don't call it "your parents" house, you most likely say "hey wanna come over to my house" or whatever. When you're assigned something in the military you're going to be calling it "yours" because it's easier to say "This is 'my' M4A1." than "THIS IS THE M4A1 ASSIGNED TO ME FROM THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS". It just saves time and everyone (sans you, I guess) can piece together the fact that you do not actually have ownership over the rifle, it was just the weapon you were assigned. It's like they're just plopping these CIWS out in random spots and calling it good, it's going to have maintenance and etc.[/QUOTE] if you actually read his post (or maybe you lack the mental power and/or the capacity to do so???) you would see that he already understood the point you were trying to make [QUOTE][B]I know guys in other branches that refer to stuff they operate (like a Abrams or an HMMWV) as "thiers"[/B], but the CIWS is pretty much automatic isnt it? Or does it have some sort of user control?[/QUOTE] and that he was mainly wondering whether it was completely automatic or partially manned by someone [QUOTE]I know guys in other branches that refer to stuff they operate (like a Abrams or an HMMWV) as "thiers", [B]but the CIWS is pretty much automatic isnt it? Or does it have some sort of user control?[/B][/QUOTE]
bottom half of my post wow I accidentally erased half of my fucking post, fuck it I'm too lazy to rewrite everything
[QUOTE=0FucksGiven;38611133]bottom half of my post wow I accidentally erased half of my fucking post, fuck it I'm too lazy to rewrite everything[/QUOTE] nice save
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.